Evolving trends in risk profiles and causes of death after heart transplantation: A ten-year multi-institutional study

被引:85
|
作者
Kirklin, JK
Naftel, DC
Bourge, RC
McGiffin, DC
Hill, JA
Rodeheffer, RJ
Jaski, BE
Hauptman, PJ
Weston, M
White-Williams, C
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35293 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Shands Hosp, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Sharp Mem Hosp & Rehabil Ctr, La Jolla, CA USA
[5] St Louis Univ Hosp, St Louis, MO USA
[6] Tampa Gen Hosp, Tampa, FL 33606 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mtc.2003.168
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: As therapeutic options evolve for advanced heart failure, the appropriate role for cardiac transplantation will require survival analyses that reflect changing trends in causes of death and patient and institutional risk profiles. Results from multi-institutional studies could be used to monitor progress in individual centers. Methods: Between 1990 and 1999, 7290 patients undergoing cardiac transplantation in 42 institutions entered a formal outcomes study. Changing survival, causes of death, and patient risk profiles were analyzed. Multivariable risk-factor equations were applied to a single institution (300 primary heart transplants) to examine differences in risk-adjusted expected versus observed actuarial outcomes over time. Results: Overall survival in the 42 institutions improved during the decade (P = .02). One- and 3-year cardiac transplant research database survival was as follows: era 1 (1990-1992), 84% and 76%, respectively; era 2 (1993-1995), 85% and 79%, respectively; and era 3 (1996-1999), 85% and 79%, respectively. Causes of death changed over time. Pretransplantation risk profiles increased over time (P = .0001), with increases in reoperations, devices, diabetes, severely ill recipients, pulmonary vascular resistance, sensitization, ischemic times, donor age, and donor inotropic support. Three-year actuarial survival in a single institution was 3% less than risk-adjusted predicted survival in era 1, 1% higher than predicted in era 2, and 7% higher than predicted in era 3. Conclusions: Survival after cardiac transplantation is gradually improving, despite increasing risk profiles. Further improvement requires periodic re-evaluation of risk profiles and causes of death to target areas of surveillance, therapy, and research. By using these methods, progress at individual institutions can be assessed in a time-related, risk-adjusted manner that also reflects changing institutional experience, expertise, or both.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 890
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Five-Year Survival Trends in Heart Transplantation Based on Recipient Age over Two Decades of Multi-Institutional Experience
    George, J. F.
    Pamboukian, S. V.
    Brown, R. N.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    Tallaj, J. A.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 31 (04): : S96 - S96
  • [22] A Multi-Institutional Study of Outcomes after Pediatric Heart Transplantation: Effect of ABCC2 Polymorphisms
    Burckart, G. J.
    Figg, W. D., II
    Brooks, M. M.
    Green, D.
    Girnita, D. M.
    Troutman, S.
    Chinnock, R.
    Canter, C.
    Addonizio, L.
    Bernstein, D.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    Naftel, D.
    Price, D. K.
    Zeevi, A.
    Webber, S. A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 : 270 - 270
  • [23] The Impact of Non-Compliance (NC) on Survival after Heart Transplantation (HT): A Multi-Institutional Study
    White-Williams, C.
    Collier, M.
    Flattery, M.
    Law, K.
    Laxson, C.
    Schlemm, A.
    Clair, K. St.
    Brown, R. N.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 28 (02): : S145 - S145
  • [24] Progress in heart transplantation: Riskier patients yet better outcomes: A 15-year multi-institutional study
    Taylor, D. O.
    Brown, R. N.
    Jessup, M. L.
    Starling, R. C.
    Aaronson, K. D.
    Rayburn, B. K.
    Czerr, J.
    Naftel, D. C.
    Kirklin, J. K.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 26 (02): : S61 - S61
  • [25] Infection and rejection risk after cardiac transplantation with induction vs. no induction: a multi-institutional study
    Mazimba, Sula
    Tallaj, Jose A.
    George, James F.
    Kirklin, James K.
    Brown, Robert N.
    Pamboukian, Salpy V.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 28 (09) : 946 - 952
  • [26] Ten-year prognosis of stroke and risk factors for death in a Japanese community - The Hisayama Study
    Kiyohara, Y
    Kubo, M
    Kato, I
    Tanizaki, Y
    Tanaka, K
    Okubo, K
    Nakamura, H
    Iida, M
    STROKE, 2003, 34 (10) : 2343 - 2347
  • [27] Risk Factor Analysis of Late Survival After Heart Transplantation According to Donor Profile: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study of 512 Transplants
    Fiorelli, A. I.
    Branco, J. N.
    Dinkhuysen, J. J.
    Oliveira Junior, J. L.
    Pereira, T. V.
    Dinardi, L. F. L.
    Santos, M. M.
    Dias, R. R.
    Pereira, L. A.
    Stolf, N. A. G.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (08) : 2469 - 2472
  • [28] A multi-institutional international study of risk factors for hematoma after thyroidectomy
    Campbell, Michael J.
    McCoy, Kelly L.
    Shen, Wen T.
    Carty, Sally E.
    Lubitz, Carrie C.
    Moalem, Jacob
    Nehs, Matthew
    Holm, Tammy
    Greenblatt, David Y.
    Press, Danielle
    Feng, Xiaoxi
    Siperstein, Allan E.
    Mitmaker, Elliot
    Benay, Cassandre
    Tabah, Roger
    Oltmann, Sarah C.
    Chen, Herbert
    Sippel, Rebecca S.
    Brekke, Andrew
    Vriens, Menno R.
    Lodewijk, Lutske
    Stephen, Antonia E.
    Nagar, Sapna
    Angelos, Peter
    Ghanem, Maher
    Prescott, Jason D.
    Zeiger, Martha A.
    Han, Patricia Aragon
    Sturgeon, Cord
    Elaraj, Dina M.
    Nixon, Iain J.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Bayles, Stephen W.
    Heneghan, Rachel
    Ochieng, Peter
    Guerrero, Marlon A.
    Ruan, Daniel T.
    SURGERY, 2013, 154 (06) : 1283 - 1289
  • [29] Outcomes of children bridged to heart transplantation with ventricular assist devices - A multi-institutional study
    Blume, ED
    Naftel, DC
    Bastardi, HJ
    Duncan, BW
    Kirklin, JK
    Webber, SA
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 113 (19) : 2313 - 2319
  • [30] Rejection with hemodynamic compromise in the current era of pediatric heart transplantation: A multi-institutional study
    Everitt, Melanie D.
    Pahl, Elfriede
    Schechtman, Kenneth B.
    Zheng, Jie
    Ringewald, Jeremy M.
    Ecuyer, Thomas L'
    Naftel, David C.
    Kirklin, James K.
    Blume, Elizabeth D.
    Bullock, Emily A.
    Canter, Charles E.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (03): : 282 - 288