Writing a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Ng, K. H. [2 ]
Peh, W. C. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Med Journal, Singapore 169850, Singapore
[2] Univ Malaya, Biomed Imaging & Intervent Journal, Dept Biomed Imaging, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
关键词
evidence-based medicine; medical writing; systematic review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) aims to combine the best available scientific evidence with clinical experience and individual judgment of patient needs. In the hierarchy of scientific evidence, systematic reviews (along with meta-analyses) occupy the highest levels in terms of the quality of evidence. A systematic review is the process of searching, selecting, appraising, synthesising and reporting clinical evidence on a particular question or topic. It is currently considered the best, least biased and most rational way to organise, gather, evaluate and integrate scientific evidence from the rapidly-changing medical and healthcare literature. Systematic reviews could be used to present current concepts or serve as review articles and replace the traditional expert opinion or narrative review. This article explains the structure and content of a systematic review.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 366
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The relationship between executive functions and writing in children: a systematic review
    Ruffini, Costanza
    Osmani, Fatbardha
    Martini, Chiara
    Giera, Winnie-Karen
    Pecini, Chiara
    CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 30 (01) : 105 - 163
  • [42] Students' sociodemographic characteristics and writing performance: a systematic literature review
    Castillo, Carolina
    Reyes, Natalia Avila
    READING AND WRITING, 2025,
  • [43] A systematic review of artificial intelligence technologies used for story writing
    Fang, Xiaoxuan
    Ng, Davy Tsz Kit
    Leung, Jac Ka Lok
    Chu, Samuel Kai Wah
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2023, 28 (11) : 14361 - 14397
  • [44] Who benefits from what: A systematic review of writing interventions
    Lu, Q
    Stanton, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 39 (5-6) : 563 - 563
  • [45] Efficacy of expressive writing versus positive writing in different populations: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lai, Jiawei
    Song, Huijuan
    Wang, Ying
    Ren, Ying
    Li, Shuang
    Xiao, Feng
    Liao, Shaona
    Xie, Tingping
    Zhuang, Weihuan
    NURSING OPEN, 2023, 10 (09): : 5961 - 5974
  • [46] Item-Writing Guidelines on Response Option Placement: A Systematic Review
    Lions, Severin
    Blanco, Maria Paz
    Dartnell, Pablo
    Monsalve, Carlos
    Ortega, Gabriel
    Lemarie, Julie
    APPLIED MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, 2024,
  • [47] Stem cells for heart failure: the experience of writing a Cochrane systematic review
    Fisher, Sheila
    Brunskill, Susan J.
    Taggart, David P.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (14) : 834 - 836
  • [48] Model texts as a feedback instrument in second language writing: A systematic review
    Nguyen, Long Quoc
    Dao, Phung
    Nguyen, Bao Trang Thi
    LANGUAGE TEACHING RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [49] Reflective writing and its impact on empathy in medical education: systematic review
    Chen, Isabel
    Forbes, Connor
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION FOR HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2014, 11
  • [50] Expressive writing as a therapeutic intervention for people with advanced disease: a systematic review
    N. Kupeli
    G. Chatzitheodorou
    N. A. Troop
    D. McInnerney
    P. Stone
    B. Candy
    BMC Palliative Care, 18