Epicutaneous immunotherapy for treatment of peanut allergy: Follow-up from the Consortium for Food Allergy Research

被引:32
|
作者
Scurlock, Amy M. [1 ,2 ]
Burks, A. Wesley [3 ]
Sicherer, Scott H. [4 ]
Leung, Donald Y. M. [5 ]
Kim, Edwin H. [3 ]
Henning, Alice K. [6 ]
Dawson, Peter [6 ]
Lindblad, Robert W. [6 ]
Berin, M. Cecilia [4 ]
Cho, Christine B. [5 ]
Davidson, Wendy F. [7 ]
Plaut, Marshall [7 ]
Sampson, Hugh A. [4 ]
Wood, Robert A. [8 ]
Jones, Stacie M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Pediat, 13 Childrens Way,Slot 512-13, Little Rock, AR 72202 USA
[2] Arkansas Childrens Hosp, 800 Marshall St, Little Rock, AR 72202 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, UNC Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Natl Jewish Hlth, Dept Pediat, Denver, CO USA
[6] Emmes, Rockville, MD USA
[7] NIAID, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[8] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Peanut allergy; food allergy; epicutaneous immunotherapy; desensitization; &nbsp; IgE; IgG < sub > 4 <; sub >??????; follow-up; CHILDHOOD; CHILDREN; SAFETY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaci.2020.11.027
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Consortium for Food Allergy Research investigators previously reported 52-week outcomes from a randomized controlled trial of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy, observing modest and statistically significant induction of desensitization, highest in children ages 4 to 11 years. Objective: We sought to evaluate changes in efficacy, safety, and mechanistic parameters following extended open-label peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy. Methods: Peanut-allergic participants (4-25 years) received 52 weeks of placebo (PLB), Viaskin Peanut 100 mg (VP100) or 250 mg (VP250), and then crossed over to VP250 for PLB (PLBVP250) and VP100 (VP100-VP250) participants and continued treatment for VP250 participants (total 5 130 weeks of active epicutaneous immunotherapy). Efficacy was assessed by double blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (5044 mg peanut protein), and adherence, safety, and mechanistic parameters were evaluated. Results: At week 130, desensitization success was achieved in 1 of 20 (5%) PLB-VP250, 5 of 24 (20.8%) VP100-VP250, and 9 of 25 (36%) VP250 participants, with median successfully consumed dose change from baseline of 11.5 mg, 141.5 mg, and 400 mg, respectively. Median age (years) for week 130 desensitization success was 6.2 years (interquartile range, 5.29.1) versus 9.4 years (interquartile range, 7.6-12.8) for failures (P < .001). Adherence was 96%. Adverse reactions were predominantly local patch-site reactions. Significant increases in peanut-and Ara h2-specific IgG4 observed at week 52 persisted to week 130. By a post hoc analysis, there were no statistically significant increases from week 52 toweek 130 in either desensitization success or successfully consumed dose. Conclusions: Extended treatment with VP250 was well tolerated, and desensitization observed at week 52 persisted between weeks 52 and 130. Treatment success was observed predominantly in younger participants, with younger age at initiation of active therapy an important predictor of success. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;147:992-1003.) <comment>Superscript/Subscript Available</comment
引用
收藏
页码:992 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Role of Regulatory T Cells in Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Food Allergy
    Liu, Guirong
    Liu, Manman
    Wang, Junjuan
    Mou, Yao
    Che, Huilian
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [42] Safety of epicutaneous immunotherapy for the treatment of peanut allergy: A phase 1 study using the Viaskin patch
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Agbotounou, Wence K.
    Fleischer, David M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Pesek, Robert D.
    Harris, Michael W.
    Martin, Laurent
    Thebault, Claude
    Ruban, Charles
    Benhamou, Pierre-Henri
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 137 (04) : 1258 - +
  • [43] Long-Lasting Egg Consumption in Egg Allergic Children Treated with Oral Immunotherapy (OIT): Follow-up from the Consortium of Food Allergy Research (CoFAR) Study
    Jones, Stacie M.
    Burks, A. Wesley
    Wood, Robert A.
    Fleischer, David Mark
    Sicherer, Scott H.
    Henning, Alice
    Lindblad, Robert
    Dawson, Peter
    Vickery, Brian P.
    Keet, Corinne
    Liu, Andrew H.
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2014, 133 (02) : AB403 - AB403
  • [44] Recent advances in epicutaneous immunotherapy and potential applications in food allergy
    Herve, Pierre-Louis
    Dioszeghy, Vincent
    Matthews, Katie
    Bee, Katharine J.
    Campbell, Dianne E.
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY, 2023, 4
  • [45] The Current State of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Food Allergy: a Comprehensive Review
    Bruce J. Lanser
    Donald Y. M. Leung
    Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 2018, 55 : 153 - 161
  • [46] The Current State of Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Food Allergy: a Comprehensive Review
    Lanser, Bruce J.
    Leung, Donald Y. M.
    CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 55 (02) : 153 - 161
  • [47] Peanut Oral Immunotherapy and Omalizumab Treatment for Peanut Allergy
    Henson, M.
    Edie, A.
    Steele, P.
    Kamilaris, J.
    Kulis, M.
    Thyagarajan, A.
    Vickery, B. P.
    Burks, A. W.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 129 (02) : AB28 - AB28
  • [48] What are the Optimal Intervals for Food Allergy Follow-Up?
    Schuval, Susan
    Sabbatini, Carla
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2025, 155 (02) : AB250 - AB250
  • [49] Gut homing receptors designate epicutaneous immunotherapy as the most appropriate route for the treatment of food allergy in a model of peanut sensitized mice
    Dioszeghy, V
    Mondoulet, L.
    Pelletier, B.
    Wavrin, S.
    Puteaux, E.
    Ligouis, M.
    Dhelft, V
    Plaquet, C.
    Dupont, C.
    Benhamou, P. H.
    Sampson, H.
    ALLERGY, 2016, 71 : 173 - 174
  • [50] An evaluation of factors influencing response to epicutaneous immunotherapy for peanut allergy in the PEPITES trial
    Fleischer, David M.
    Chinthrajah, Sharon
    Scurlock, Amy M.
    Campbell, Dianne E.
    Green, Todd D.
    Bee, Katharine J.
    Peillon, Aurelie
    Ocheltree, Terrance
    Sampson, Hugh A.
    ALLERGY AND ASTHMA PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 41 (05) : 326 - 335