Inferring network properties from time series using transfer entropy and mutual information: Validation of multivariate versus bivariate approaches

被引:22
|
作者
Novelli, Leonardo [1 ]
Lizier, Joseph T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Engn, Ctr Complex Syst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Directed connectivity; Functional connectivity; Network inference; Multivariate transfer entropy; Information theory; Complex networks; SMALL-WORLD; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; ANATOMICAL NETWORKS; INFERENCE; ORGANIZATION; DYNAMICS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1162/netn_a_00178
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Functional and effective networks inferred from time series are at the core of network neuroscience. Interpreting properties of these networks requires inferred network models to reflect key underlying structural features. However, even a few spurious links can severely distort network measures, posing a challenge for functional connectomes. We study the extent to which micro- and macroscopic properties of underlying networks can be inferred by algorithms based on mutual information and bivariate/multivariate transfer entropy. The validation is performed on two macaque connectomes and on synthetic networks with various topologies (regular lattice, small-world, random, scale-free, modular). Simulations are based on a neural mass model and on autoregressive dynamics (employing Gaussian estimators for direct comparison to functional connectivity and Granger causality). We find that multivariate transfer entropy captures key properties of all network structures for longer time series. Bivariate methods can achieve higher recall (sensitivity) for shorter time series but are unable to control false positives (lower specificity) as available data increases. This leads to overestimated clustering, small-world, and rich-club coefficients, underestimated shortest path lengths and hub centrality, and fattened degree distribution tails. Caution should therefore be used when interpreting network properties of functional connectomes obtained via correlation or pairwise statistical dependence measures, rather than more holistic (yet data-hungry) multivariate models. AUTHOR SUMMARY We compare bivariate and multivariate methods for inferring networks from time series, which are generated using a neural mass model and autoregressive dynamics. We assess their ability to reproduce key properties of the underlying structural network. Validation is performed on two macaque connectomes and on synthetic networks with various topologies (regular lattice, small-world, random, scale-free, modular). Even a few spurious links can severely bias key network properties. Multivariate transfer entropy performs best on all topologies for longer time series.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 404
页数:32
相关论文
共 23 条