The current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

被引:4
|
作者
Altamar, Hernan O. [1 ]
Herrell, S. Duke [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Urol Surg, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
关键词
continence; potency; prostate cancer; robot-assisted prostatectomy; surgical margin; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; NERVE PRESERVATION; SEXUAL FUNCTION; CONTINENCE; OUTCOMES; RECONSTRUCTION; RECOVERY; CAUTERY; POTENCY;
D O I
10.1097/MOU.0b013e32833378dc
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review To review the recent urologic literature with a focus on refinements of surgical technique in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and to discuss the impact of these developments on the 'trifecta' of prostate cancer management: oncologic, continence, and potency outcomes. Recent findings Refinements in the surgical technique during the established steps of radical prostatectomy have led to improved functional outcomes following RALP. Early continence rates have increased, and potency, with evolving respect for the neurovascular bundle and neural anatomy, has further promise. 'Long-term' outcomes demonstrate favorable results in continence and potency. Oncologic outcomes, specifically low positive margin rates, have been maintained and even improved in many series during the evolution of this widely accepted procedure. Summary RALP has continued to rapidly disseminate through the urologic community, but the ultimate impact remains under scrutiny. The procedure has seen birth from open and laparoscopic prostatectomy, and its success has been measured against contemporary open prostatectomy series during its infancy. Short and long-term oncologic outcomes must be followed carefully. The assessment of functional outcomes of continence and potency requires honest and, as best possible, objective analysis. Prospective, randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up utilizing validated instruments are necessary to evaluate RALP and all associated technical modifications.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 59
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for large prostate
    Du, J.
    Ho, S. S. H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 119 : 44 - 44
  • [32] Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the CGMH experience
    Pang, See-Tong
    Wu, Chun-Te
    Tsui, Ke-Hung
    Chang, Phei-Lang
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 17 : A229 - A230
  • [33] Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Francois Rozet
    Justin Harmon
    Xavier Cathelineau
    Eric Barret
    Guy Vallancien
    World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 171 - 179
  • [34] Persisting media criticism of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Charles Lee Jackson
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (1) : 61 - 61
  • [35] Persisting media criticism of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Jackson, Charles Lee
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2010, 4 (01) : 61 - 61
  • [36] Robot-assisted laparoscopic transvesical diverticulectomy and simple prostatectomy
    Magera J.S.
    Jr.
    Adam Childs M.
    Frank I.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 2 (3) : 205 - 208
  • [37] Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Sakon, M.
    Sekino, Y.
    Okada, M.
    Seki, H.
    Munakata, Y.
    HERNIA, 2017, 21 (05) : 745 - 748
  • [38] Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    M. Sakon
    Y. Sekino
    M. Okada
    H. Seki
    Y. Munakata
    Hernia, 2017, 21 : 745 - 748
  • [39] The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy
    Tyritzis, Stavros Ioannis
    Collins, Justin W.
    Wiklund, Nils Peter
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 34 (02) : 101 - 109
  • [40] Utility of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia Following Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Funamizu, Naotake
    Mineta, Sho
    Ozaki, Takahiro
    Mishima, Kohei
    Igarashi, Kazuharu
    Omura, Kenji
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Wakabayashi, G. O.
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (03): : 1432 - 1437