Characteristics, reactivity and source apportionment of ambient volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in a typical tourist city

被引:48
|
作者
Zhang, Xufeng [1 ]
Yin, Yuanyuan [2 ]
Wen, Jianhui [2 ]
Huang, Shilei [2 ]
Han, Deming [1 ]
Chen, Xiaojia [1 ]
Cheng, Jinping [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Guilin Municipal Environm Monitoring Ctr, Guilin 541002, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, China Inst Urban Governance, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Volatile organic compounds; Tourist city; VOCs reactivity; Source apportionment; PMF model; PEARL RIVER-DELTA; PHOTOCHEMICAL OZONE FORMATION; NONMETHANE HYDROCARBONS; PETROLEUM REFINERY; SEASONAL-VARIATION; INDUSTRIAL-AREA; CHEMICAL LOSS; URBAN AREA; HAZE DAYS; SHANGHAI;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116898
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Currently, studies on the characteristics, reactivity and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are mainly focused on large cities, however, information about the source characteristics of VOCs in less developed regions is insufficient. In this study, ambient air samples (n = 352) were collected from 11 sampling sites (including urban areas, suburban areas, outer suburb areas, and background areas) in Guilin, a typical tourist city located in southwest China, during the period 1st May to 30th November 2018 to determine the concentrations, temporal and spatial distribution, and activity of VOCs and to identify their sources. The results showed that the concentration of VOCs was 23.67 +/- 9.77 ppbv, and aromatics were the most abundant VOCs, accounting for 65.75% of the total VOCs concentrations. The propylene-equivalent concentration and the ozone formation potential (OFP) of VOCs were 10.08 ppbv and 158.02 ppbv, respectively, and aromatics contributed the largest, accounting for 88.87% and 93.00%, respectively. Moreover, the ratios of T/B and X/E were 1.44 +/- 0.92 and 0.74 +/- 1.10, respectively. The temporal and spatial distribution of VOCs showed that there were significant differences of the VOCs concentrations between seasons (higher in autumn and lower in summer) and the VOCs concentrations were both high in urban areas and outer suburb areas. Based on the positive matrix factorization (PMF) method, 5 sources were identified as fuel evaporation, vehicle exhaust, industrial productions, solvent use, and biogenic emissions, contributing 35.32%, 28.29%, 15.65%, 11.20%, and 9.54%, respectively. Results indicated that a high proportion of aromatics in ambient VOCs and a large contribution of aromatics to O-3 generation are the main characteristics that differentiate Guilin as a typical tourist city from other types of cities. We concluded that the VOCs in Guilin mainly come from the emissions of fuel evaporation and vehicle exhaust, and the impact of industrial emissions is relatively small, which is consistent with the characteristics of a tourist city. Moreover, our results revealed that the aging degree of air mass in Guilin is relatively higher than other cities, which inferred that the VOCs in Guilin may be affected by transmission from external sources.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristics of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in urban area of Beijing: Variations, photochemical reactivity and source apportionment
    Lihui Zhang
    Hong Li
    Zhenhai Wu
    Weiqi Zhang
    Kankan Liu
    Xi Cheng
    Yujie Zhang
    Bin Li
    Yizhen Chen
    [J]. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2020, 95 (09) : 190 - 200
  • [42] Characteristics of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in urban area of Beijing: Variations, photochemical reactivity and source apportionment
    Zhang, Lihui
    Li, Hong
    Wu, Zhenhai
    Zhang, Weiqi
    Liu, Kankan
    Cheng, Xi
    Zhang, Yujie
    Li, Bin
    Chen, Yizhen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2020, 95 : 190 - 200
  • [43] Characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China
    Wei, Wei
    Ren, Yunting
    Yang, Gan
    Cheng, Shuiyuan
    Han, Lihui
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2019, 191 (12)
  • [44] Characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China
    Wei Wei
    Yunting Ren
    Gan Yang
    Shuiyuan Cheng
    Lihui Han
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2019, 191
  • [45] Pollution Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Volatile Organic Compounds in Typical Solvent-using Industrial Parks in Beijing
    Liu, Rui
    Yao, Zhen
    Hua, Xiao-Hui
    Guo, Xiu-Rui
    Wang, Hai-Lin
    Qi, Feng
    [J]. Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 45 (10): : 5661 - 5670
  • [46] Characteristics and Source Apportionment of Volatile Organic Compounds for Different Functional Zones in a Coastal City of Southeast China
    Hu, Baoye
    Xu, Hui
    Deng, Junjun
    Yi, Zhigang
    Chen, Jinsheng
    Xu, Lingling
    Hong, Zhenyu
    Chen, Xiaoqiu
    Hong, Youwei
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (11) : 2840 - 2852
  • [47] Emission characteristics of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from typical plywood industry
    Lü, Da-Qi
    Lu, Si-Hua
    Shao, Min
    Wang, Ling-Feng
    Ren, Jie
    [J]. Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2020, 40 (05): : 1924 - 1931
  • [48] Levels and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in southwestern area of Mexico City
    Sosa, E. Rodolfo
    Bravo, A. Humberto
    Mugica, A. Violeta
    Sanchez, A. Pablo
    Bueno, L. Emma
    Krupa, Sagar
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2009, 157 (03) : 1038 - 1044
  • [49] Source Apportionment of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) during Ozone Polluted Days in Hangzhou, China
    Han, Lixia
    Chen, Linghong
    Li, Kangwei
    Bao, Zhier
    Zhao, Yanyun
    Zhang, Xin
    Azzi, Merched
    Cen, Kefa
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (12)
  • [50] Insight into the environmental monitoring and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in various functional areas
    Shuibing Wang
    Guijian Liu
    Hong Zhang
    Mingjian Yi
    Yuan Liu
    Xingyuan Hong
    Xiang Bao
    [J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2022, 15 : 1121 - 1131