The effect of dental artifacts, contrast media, and experience on Interobserver contouring variations in head and neck anatomy

被引:33
|
作者
O'Daniel, Jennifer C.
Rosenthal, David I.
Garden, Adam S.
Barker, Jerry L.
Ahamad, Anesa
Ang, K. Kian
Asper, Joshua A.
Blanco, Angel I.
de Crevoisier, Renaud
Holsinger, Christopher
Patel, Chirag B.
Schwartz, David L.
Wang, He
Dong, Lei
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Houston, TX USA
关键词
head and neck cancer; interobserver variability; contour delineation; CT-based treatment planning; target volume;
D O I
10.1097/01.coc.0000256704.58956.45
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate interobserver variability in the delineation of head-and-neck (H&N) anatomic structures on CT images, including the effects of image artifacts and observer experience. Methods: Nine observers (7 radiation oncologists, 1 surgeon, and 1 physician assistant) with varying levels of H&N delineation experience independently contoured H&N gross tumor volumes and critical structures on radiation therapy treatment planning CT images alongside reference diagnostic CT images for 4 patients with oropharynx cancer. Image artifacts from dental fillings partially obstructed 3 images. Differences in the structure volumes, center-of-volume positions, and boundary positions (1 SD) were measured. In-house software created three-dimensional overlap distributions, including all observers. The effects of dental artifacts and observer experience on contouring precision were investigated, and the need for contrast media was assessed. Results: In the absence of artifacts, all 9 participants achieved reasonable precision (1 SD <= 3 mm all boundaries). The structures obscured by dental image artifacts had larger variations when measured by the 3 metrics (1 SD = 8 mm cranial/caudal boundary). Experience improved the interobserver consistency of contouring for structures obscured by artifacts (1 SD = 2 mm cranial/caudal boundary). Conclusions: Interobserver contouring variability for anatomic H&N structures, specifically oropharyngeal gross tumor volumes and parotid glands, was acceptable in the absence of artifacts. Dental artifacts increased the contouring variability, but experienced participants achieved reasonable precision even with artifacts present. With a staging contrast CT image as a reference, delineation on a noncontrast treatment planning CT image can achieve acceptable precision.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Metal artifacts from dental implants in PET/CT studies of oral/head and neck cancer
    Nahmias, C.
    Carlson, E.
    Lemmens, C.
    Nuyts, J.
    Blodgett, T.
    Hamill, J.
    Faul, D.
    Townsend, D.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, : 135 - 135
  • [22] Dosimetric Impact of Dental Amalgam CT Image Artifacts On IMRT and VMAT Head and Neck Plans
    Cao, N.
    Young, L.
    Parvathaneni, U.
    Liao, J.
    Richard, P.
    Ford, E.
    Sandison, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 308 - 308
  • [23] Effect of head rotation on vascular anatomy of the neck: An ultrasound study
    Wang, Ralph
    Snoey, Eric R.
    Clements, Robert Carter
    Hern, H. Gene
    Price, Dan
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (03): : 283 - 286
  • [24] Auto-contouring via Automatic Anatomy Recognition of Organs at Risk in Head and Neck Cancer on CT images
    Wu, Xingyu
    Udupa, Jayaram K.
    Tong, Yubing
    Odhner, Dewey
    Pednekar, Gargi V.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    McLaughlin, David
    Apinorasethkul, Chavanon
    Lukens, John
    Mihailidis, Dimitris
    Shammo, Geraldine
    James, Paul
    Camaratta, Joseph
    Torigian, Drew A.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2018, 10576
  • [25] Dosimetric evaluation of the effect of dental implants in head and neck radiotherapy
    Ozen, J
    Dirican, B
    Oysul, K
    Beyzadeoglu, M
    Ucok, O
    Beydemir, B
    ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2005, 99 (06): : 743 - 747
  • [26] Dental artifacts in the head and neck region: implications for Dixon-based attenuation correction in PET/MR
    Ladefoged C.N.
    Hansen A.E.
    Keller S.H.
    Fischer B.M.
    Rasmussen J.H.
    Law I.
    Kjær A.
    Højgaard L.
    Lauze F.
    Beyer T.
    Andersen F.L.
    EJNMMI Physics, 2 (1) : 1 - 15
  • [27] Head and Neck Cancer and Social Media: The Patient Experience and Cancer Survivorship
    Gao, Rebecca W.
    Smith, Joshua D.
    Malloy, Kelly M.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (04): : E1214 - E1219
  • [28] A 3 YEAR EXPERIENCE OF TEACHING HEAD AND NECK LIVING ANATOMY AS PART OF AN INTEGRATED COURSE
    MACKENZIE, IJ
    ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 1986, 68 (02) : 114 - 114
  • [29] Dosimetric Impact of Anatomy Variations and Benefits of Mid-Course Replanning for Head and Neck IMRT
    Lindsay, P.
    Yildirim, G.
    Garden, A.
    Zhang, L.
    Yu, Z.
    Zhang, Y.
    Zhu, X.
    Theriot, L.
    Ahamad, A.
    Dong, L.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [30] USE OF CONTRAST-MEDIA IN MAGNETIC-RESONANCE TOMOGRAPHY OF HEAD AND NECK TUMORS
    FURST, G
    ZAMBOGLOU, N
    GREVEN, C
    KAHN, T
    MODDER, U
    FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIETE DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER NUKLEARMEDIZIN, 1988, 149 (05): : 489 - 495