Nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes in southern Alberta

被引:12
|
作者
Akter, Z. [1 ]
Lupwayi, N. Z. [1 ]
Balasubramanian, P. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Lethbridge Res & Dev Ctr, 5403 1st Ave South,POB 3000, Lethbridge, AB T1J 4B1, Canada
关键词
nitrogen uptake efficiency; nitrogen utilization efficiency; nitrogen use efficiency; root surface area; WINTER-WHEAT; ROOT-GROWTH; CEREAL PRODUCTION; MAIZE HYBRIDS; OILSEED RAPE; CULTIVARS; YIELD; VARIABILITY; FERTILIZER; FIXATION;
D O I
10.1139/cjps-2016-0254
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Although dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a legume capable of fixing nitrogen, fertilizer N is usually recommended for its production in Canada because it is believed to be an inefficient N fixer. Using genotypes with high N use efficiency (NUE) would reduce the amount of applied N, which usually has deleterious environmental effects. We evaluated 22 bean genotypes for N uptake efficiency (NUpE) in a greenhouse trial and 16 genotypes for N use efficiency (NUE) and its components: NUpE and N utilization efficiency (NUtE) in two seasons (2012 and 2013) of a field trial at 30 kg N ha(-1) (30N) and 100 kg N ha(-1) (100N) soil levels. Root biomass and surface area were highly correlated with NUpE in the greenhouse, where NUpE at 100N was 48% lower than that at 30N. In the field trial, grain yield was highly correlated with NUpE and NUtE at both 30N and 100N. The NUpE at 100N was 65% lower than that at 30N, and NUE at 100N was 68% lower than that at 30N. The low NUE at 100N in the field trial was mainly due to the difference in NUpE. This study also identified nine genotypes, including five germplasm lines (PI 136692, GH-196, UNS-117, UI-239, and LEF2RB) and four cultivars (Othello, Viva, AC Redbond, and Island), that were both N-efficient (at 30N) and N-responsive (to 100N).
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 619
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance Evaluation of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes for Yield and Related Traits at Areka, Southern Ethiopia
    Yohannes, Simon
    Loha, Gobeze
    Gessese, Mesfin Kebede
    ADVANCES IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 2020
  • [32] RESPONSE OF FRENCH BEAN (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS) GENOTYPES TO NITROGEN
    NEGI, SC
    SHEKHAR, J
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1993, 38 (02) : 321 - 322
  • [33] Multivariate analysis of biological nitrogen fixation and seed yield in Iranian common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Golparvar, Ahmad Reza
    RESEARCH ON CROPS, 2012, 13 (03) : 916 - 919
  • [34] Physical and functional characteristics of selected dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flours
    Siddiq, M.
    Ravi, R.
    Harte, J. B.
    Dolan, K. D.
    LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 43 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [35] Relationships Between Protein Content and Chemical Compositions of Local Dry Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes Grown in Turkey
    Harmankaya, Mustafa
    Karadas, Serdar
    Palta, Cetin
    Ceyhan, Ercan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2009, 21 (02) : 1535 - 1540
  • [36] The Paleobiolinguistics of the Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Brown, Cecil H.
    Clement, Charles R.
    Epps, Patience
    Luedeling, Eike
    Wichmann, Soren
    ETHNOBIOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 5 : 104 - 115
  • [37] INORGANIC NUTRITIONAL COMPOSITION OF COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) GENOTYPES RACE CHILE
    Paredes C, Mario
    Becerra V, Viviana
    Tay U, Juan
    CHILEAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2009, 69 (04): : 486 - 495
  • [38] Path analysis of yield and yield components in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Mayra Contreras-Rojas
    Dilmer Gabriel Guerra Guzmán
    Seir Antonio Salazar Mercado
    Fredy Antonio Salazar-Villareal
    Euphytica, 2024, 220
  • [39] Biochemical Responses of Some Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes to Drought Stress
    Mombeni, M.
    Abbasi, A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 21 (02): : 407 - 421
  • [40] EVALUATION OF THE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO Sclerotinia sclerotiorum IN FOUR MICORRYZED BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) GENOTYPES
    Arlene Mora-Romero, Guadalupe
    Lopez-Meyer, Melina
    Maria Ramirez-Douriet, Claudia
    del Carmen Martinez-Valenzuela, Maria
    de los Angeles Romero-Urias, Cecilia
    Herrera-Rodriguez, Gabriel
    Felix-Gastelum, Ruben
    INTERCIENCIA, 2016, 41 (02) : 127 - 132