Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and innovation: A systematic literature review on barriers, enablers, and innovation types

被引:75
|
作者
Stornelli, Aldo [1 ]
Ozcan, Sercan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Simms, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Fac Business & Law, Richmond Bldg,Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England
[2] Bahcesehir Univ, Dept Engn Management, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Moscow, Russia
关键词
advanced manufacturing; technological adoption; adoption process; innovation types; barriers and enablers; Industry; 4; 0; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; FLEXIBLE AUTOMATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AMT ADOPTION; IMPLEMENTATION; DIFFUSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2021.104229
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines the barriers and enablers within the adoption process of advanced manufacturing technologies (AMTs) and their relationship to different innovation types as outcomes of this process. Whilst the requirement to improve AMT adoption is widely acknowledged, the existing literature lacks a comprehensive understanding of the main barriers and enablers within the adoption process. Furthermore, it does not reveal how these barriers and enablers are related to different innovation types. We provide a systematic literature review of the barriers and enablers to AMT adoption. The findings of this review are based on a total of eightyseven peer-reviewed articles from the business and management literature from 1999-2019. Our findings provide several contributions to the literature. Firstly, by integrating evidence from empirical studies, we identify five main types of barriers and four main types of enablers to adoption. Secondly, we conceptualise three key stages of the AMT adoption process and classify the barriers and enablers on the basis of whether they apply to an individual stage, or whether their influence is pertinent across the whole process. Thirdly, we reveal the relationship between categories of barriers and enablers associated to innovation types outcomes: product, process, service or business model innovations. The results of our study provide important implications for both managers and policy makers based on the evidence of the key barriers and enablers. Further, we suggest several directions for future research, including the need to examine the post-installation stage.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Innovation capability: a systematic literature review
    Mendoza-Silva, Andrea
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2021, 24 (03) : 707 - 734
  • [22] Reverse innovation: a systematic literature review
    Hadengue, Marine
    de Marcellis-Warin, Nathalie
    Warin, Thierry
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2017, 12 (02) : 142 - 182
  • [23] Green innovation: A systematic literature review
    Takalo, Salim Karimi
    Tooranloo, Hossein Sayyadi
    Parizi, Zahra Shahabaldini
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [24] Soil carbon enhancing practices: a systematic review of barriers and enablers of adoption
    Ng'ang'a, Stanley Karanja
    Jalang'o, Dorcas Anyango
    Girvetz, Evan Hartunian
    [J]. SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (12)
  • [25] THE DEFINITION OF INNOVATION IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS (HTA): A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Hofmann, S.
    Branner, J.
    Misra, A.
    Lintener, H.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S668 - S668
  • [26] Barriers and enablers of technology adoption in the mining industry
    Ediriweera, Amali
    Wiewiora, Anna
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 73
  • [27] Industry 4.0 Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Blockchain Technology in Creating Smart and Sustainable Manufacturing Facilities
    Alazab, Moutaz
    Alhyari, Salah
    [J]. INFORMATION, 2024, 15 (02)
  • [28] Types of innovation and artificial intelligence: A systematic quantitative literature review and research agenda
    Mariani, Marcello M.
    Machado, Isa
    Nambisan, Satish
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2023, 155
  • [29] Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation
    Jugend, Daniel
    Fiorini, Paula De Camargo
    Armellini, Fabiano
    Ferrari, Aline Gabriela
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 156
  • [30] Knowledge Sharing, Innovation Strategy and Innovation Capability: A Systematic Literature Review
    Wibowo, Mufti Agung
    Widodo
    Fachrunnisa, Olivia
    Adhiatma, Ardian
    Nugroho, Marno
    Prabowo, Yulianto
    [J]. COMPLEX, INTELLIGENT AND SOFTWARE INTENSIVE SYSTEMS, CISIS-2021, 2021, 278 : 473 - 483