Efficacy and safety of transvenous lead extraction in 108 consecutive patients: a single-centre experience

被引:9
|
作者
Monsefi, Nadejda [1 ,2 ]
Waraich, Harmeet Singh [2 ]
Vamos, Mate [3 ]
Erath, Julia [3 ]
Sirat, Sami [1 ]
Moritz, Anton [2 ]
Hohnloser, Stefan H. [3 ]
机构
[1] Heart Ctr Siegburg, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Ringstr 49, D-53721 Siegburg, Germany
[2] Goethe Univ, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
[3] Goethe Univ, Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Cardiol, Div Clin Electrophysiol, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
Laser-assisted lead extraction; Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Endocarditis; Device infection; CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR LEADS; ESC GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1093/icvts/ivy351
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The number of cardiac implantable electronic devices is growing worldwide because they play a relevant role in improving the survival rate in patients with specific heart diseases. Cardiac implantable electronic devices complications including infection, dysfunction or venous stenosis increase the need for the least traumatic way to explant leads. Our goal was to report the successes and procedural complication rates of transvenous lead extraction (TLE) in a consecutive series of patients. METHODS: From 2010 to 2016, 108 patients underwent TLE of 227 leads due to endocarditis (n = 21; 19%), pocket infection (n = 58; 54%) or lead dysfunction (n = 29; 27%). In 98% (n = 106) of the patients, laser-assisted lead extraction was performed. In 2% (n = 2) of the patients, the application of a solitary locking stylet was sufficient. The patient mean age was 68 +/- 14 years; 25% of the patients had previous cardiac surgery. TLE was performed a mean of 9 +/- 6 years after the implantation of the existing device. RESULTS: Complete procedural success (removal of all lead material from the vascular space) was achieved in 98.7% (n = 224), and clinical success (achievement of all clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal and absence of major complications) was achieved in 98% (n = 106). In 2 patients the procedure failed due to a vascular tear requiring a thoracotomy. In 1 patient, complete lead extraction was not possible due to heavy calcification (coronary-sinus lead). The 30-day mortality rate was 3.7% (n = 4); the patients died of multiorgan failure (n = 1), cardiac failure (n = 1) and septicaemia (n = 2). The procedure-related major complication rate was 2% (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted TLE seems to be a safe and effective procedure with an acceptable complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 708
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sentinel node biopsy in melanoma: a single-centre experience with 216 consecutive patients
    Moser, J.
    Moshammer, R.
    Koglbauer, G.
    Kitzwoegerer, M.
    Bachner, M.
    Trautinger, F.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2016, 174 (04) : 889 - 891
  • [32] Transvenous extraction of pacing and defibrillating leads: results and complications of a ten-years single-centre experience
    Bongiorni, MG
    Arena, G
    Soldati, E
    Gherarducci, G
    Caravelli, P
    Dell'Anna, R
    Nardi, C
    Mariani, M
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 : 682 - 682
  • [33] Safety, efficacy and functional outcomes of photoselective vaporisation of the prostate: A single-centre experience
    Kumar, Sanjay
    Panaiyadiyan, Sridhar
    Singh, Prashant
    Dogra, Premnath
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2023, 16 (03) : 245 - 251
  • [34] The CyPass Glaucoma Stent Following Withdrawal: A Single-Centre Experience on Efficacy and Safety
    Hussain, M.
    Vergados, A.
    Hussain, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 86 - 86
  • [35] Prognostic value of renal failure in patients undergoing transvenous lead extraction: single centre experience and systematic review of the literature
    Massaro, Giulia
    Spadotto, Alberto
    Canovi, Luca
    Martignani, Cristian
    Ziacchi, Matteo
    Angeletti, Andrea
    Galie, Nazzareno
    Boriani, Giuseppe
    Biffi, Mauro
    Diemberger, Igor
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2022, 19 (11) : 905 - 913
  • [36] Trends Among Patients Undergoing Transvenous Lead Extraction: A Single Center Experience
    Ayub, Muhammad Talha
    Mathew, Don
    Aronis, Konstantinos
    Kancharla, Krishna
    Bhonsale, Aditya
    Thoma, Floyd W.
    Voigt, Andrew
    Jain, Sandeep
    Estes, Nathan A.
    Saba, Samir
    Shalaby, Alaa
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [37] Safety and efficacy of transvenous lead extraction of very old leads
    Pecha, Simon
    Ziegelhoeffer, Tibor
    Yildirim, Yalin
    Choi, Yeong-Hoon
    Willems, Stephan
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Burger, Heiko
    Hakmi, Samer
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 32 (03) : 402 - 407
  • [38] Initial experience with the Tightrail rotating mechanical dilator sheath for transvenous lead extraction: safety and efficacy
    Aytemir, K.
    Yorgun, H.
    Canpolat, U.
    Sahiner, M. L.
    Kaya, E. B.
    Evranos, B.
    Ozer, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2015, 36 : 821 - 822
  • [39] Safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction in elderly patients
    Kutarski, Andrzej
    Polewczyk, Anna
    Boczar, Krzysztof
    Zabek, Andrzej
    Polewczyk, Maciej
    CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (01) : 47 - 52
  • [40] Treatment strategies in femoral pseudoaneurysms. Single-centre experience in 206 consecutive patients
    Pfeil, W
    Nowak, B
    Muessig, S
    Fach, WA
    Huljic, P
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 206 - 206