Randomised Phase 1 clinical trials in oncology

被引:24
|
作者
Iasonos, Alexia [1 ]
O'Quigley, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] UCL, Dept Stat Sci, London, England
关键词
DOSE-EXPANSION COHORTS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DESIGNS; ESCALATION;
D O I
10.1038/s41416-021-01412-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aims of Phase 1 trials in oncology have broadened considerably from simply demonstrating that the agent/regimen of interest is well tolerated in a relatively heterogeneous patient population to addressing multiple objectives under the heading of early-phase trials and, if possible, obtaining reliable evidence regarding clinical activity to lead to drug approvals via the Accelerated Approval approach or Breakthrough Therapy designation in cases where the tumours are rare, prognosis is poor or where there might be an unmet therapeutic need. Constructing a Phase 1 design that can address multiple objectives within the context of a single trial is not simple. Randomisation can play an important role, but carrying out such randomisation according to the principles of equipoise is a significant challenge in the Phase 1 setting. If the emerging data are not sufficient to definitively address the aims early on, then a proper design can reduce biases, enhance interpretability, and maximise information so that the Phase 1 data can be more compelling. This article outlines objectives and design considerations that need to be adhered to in order to respect ethical and scientific principles required for research in human subjects in early phase clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 926
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of pharmacodynamic biomarkers in immuno-oncology phase 1 clinical trials
    Salawu, Abdulazeez
    Hernando-Calvo, Alberto
    Chen, Rachel Y.
    Araujo, Daniel, V
    Oliva, Marc
    Liu, Zhihui A.
    Siu, Lillian L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 173 : 167 - 177
  • [22] Phase 1 Oncology Clinical Trials for Related Subpopulations: The Power Walk Design
    Georgene Schroeder
    Jeff A. Sloan
    Stephen Cha
    Pamela Atherton
    Cristine Allmer
    Charles Erlichman
    Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association, 2002, 36 (3): : 581 - 593
  • [23] Attitudes towards and participation in randomised clinical trials in oncology: A review of the literature
    Ellis, PM
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2000, 11 (08) : 939 - 945
  • [24] Increasing complexity in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Malik, Laeeq
    Lu, David
    INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2019, 37 (03) : 519 - 523
  • [25] Evaluation of Enrollment in Oncology Phase I Clinical Trials
    van der Biessen, A. J.
    Cranendonk, M. A.
    van der Holt, B.
    Verweij, J.
    de Jonge, M. J. A.
    Mathijssen, R. H. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 47 : S161 - S161
  • [26] Participation of women in phase I oncology clinical trials
    Vidal, L.
    Berg, R.
    Yang, Z.
    Moss, K. R.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [27] Early Phase Clinical Trials in Pediatric Hematology and Oncology
    Corbacioglu, S.
    KLINISCHE PADIATRIE, 2012, 224 (03): : 197 - 200
  • [28] Phase I clinical trials in oncology: Ethical issues
    Goldwasser, F
    THERAPIE, 2004, 59 (04): : 431 - 433
  • [29] Increasing complexity in oncology phase I clinical trials
    Laeeq Malik
    David Lu
    Investigational New Drugs, 2019, 37 : 519 - 523
  • [30] Publication Outcomes of Phase II Oncology Clinical Trials
    Hoeg, Rasmus T.
    Lee, Jennifer A.
    Mathiason, Michelle A.
    Rokkones, Kristina
    Serck, Stephanie L.
    Crampton, Kaye L.
    Emmel, Ann E.
    Severson, Eileen A.
    Go, Ronald S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2009, 32 (03): : 253 - 257