Prophylactic heparin in patients with severe sepsis treated with drotrecogin alfa (activated)

被引:121
|
作者
Levi, Marcel
Levy, Mitchell
Williams, Mark D.
Douglas, Ivor
Artigas, Antonio
Antonelli, Massimo
Wyncoll, Duncan
Janes, Jonathan
Booth, Frank V.
Wang, Dazhe
Sundin, David P.
Macias, William L.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Rhode Isl Hosp, Providence, RI USA
[5] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[6] Eli Lilly & Co, Lilly Res Labs, Indianapolis, IN USA
[7] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[8] Denver Hlth, Div Pulm Sci & Crit Care Med, Denver, CO USA
[9] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Inst Parc Tauli, Sabadell Hosp, Crit Care Ctr, Sabadell, Spain
[10] Policlin Univ A Gemelli Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuor, Rome, Italy
[11] Guys & St Thomas Natl Hlth Serv Fdn Trust, London, England
关键词
critical care; recombinant human activated protein C; XPRESS; clinical trial;
D O I
10.1164/rccm.200612-1803OC
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Rationale: Patients with severe sepsis frequently receive prophylactic heparin during drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DrotAA) treatment due to risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Biological plausibility exists for heparin to reduce DrotAA efficacy and/or increase bleeding. Objectives: Primary: demonstrate in adult patients with severe sepsis receiving DrotAA treatment that 28-day mortality was equivalent for patients treated with concomitant prophylactic heparin compared with placebo; secondary: safety and VTE incidence. Methods: International, randomized, double-blind, phase 4, equivalence-design trial (n = 1994). Patients were eligible if indicated for and receiving DrotAA treatment under the country's approved label. Study drug (low molecular weight/unfractionated heparin) or placebo (saline) was administered every 12 hours during DrotAA infusion (24 ug/kg/hr for 96 hr). In patients on baseline heparin and randomized to placebo, heparin was stopped. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-eight-clay mortality was not equivalent between treatment groups. Heparin mortality was numerically lower (28.3 vs. 31.9%; p = 0.08). In the prospectively defined subgroup of patients exposed to heparin at baseline, patients receiving placebo experienced higher mortality (35.6 vs. 26.9%; p = 0.005). For safety, significant differences were observed during Days 0-6 for any bleeding event (placebo, n = 78; heparin, n = 105; p = 0.049) and ischemic stroke during Days 0-6 (placebo, In = 12; heparin, n = 3; p = 0.02) and Days 0-28 (placebo, In = 17; heparin, n = 5; p = 0.009). The VTE rate was low, with no statistical difference between groups (0-6 cl, p = 0.60; 0-28 cl, p = 0.26). Conclusions: Compared with placebo, concomitant prophylactic heparin was not equivalent, did not increase 28-day mortality, and had an acceptable safety profile in patients with severe sepsis receiving DrotAA. Heparin discontinuation should be carefully weighed in patients considered for DrotAA treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条