Comparative analysis of different methods for image enhancement

被引:6
|
作者
Wu Xiao-feng [1 ]
Hu Shi-gang [1 ]
Zhao Jin [1 ]
Li Zhi-ming [2 ]
Li Jin [1 ]
Tang Zhi-jun [1 ]
Xi Zai-fang [1 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Informat & Elect Engn, Xiangtan 411201, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Jinan, Sch Informat Sci & Engn, Jinan 250022, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
image enhancement; wavelet transform; histogram equalization; unsharp masking (UM); modulus maxl mum; threshold; MODULUS MAXIMA; WAVELET; EQUALIZATION; HISTOGRAM;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-014-2461-y
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Image enhancement technology plays a very important role to improve image quality in image processing. By enhancing some information and restraining other information selectively, it can improve image visual effect. The objective of this work is to implement the image enhancement to gray scale images using different techniques. After the fundamental methods of image enhancement processing are demonstrated, image enhancement algorithms based on space and frequency domains are systematically investigated and compared. The advantage and defect of the above-mentioned algorithms are analyzed. The algorithms of wavelet based image enhancement are also deduced and generalized. Wavelet transform modulus maxima (WTMM) is a method for detecting the fractal dimension of a signal, it is well used for image enhancement. The image techniques are compared by using the mean (mu), standard deviation (sigma), mean square error (MSE) and PSNR (peak signal to noise ratio). A group of experimental results demonstrate that the image enhancement algorithm based on wavelet transform is effective for image de-noising and enhancement. Wavelet transform modulus maxima method is one of the best methods for image enhancement.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4563 / 4570
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Analysis of Radar Image Compression Methods
    Lubczonek, Jacek
    Borawski, Mariusz
    2015 16TH INTERNATIONAL RADAR SYMPOSIUM (IRS), 2015, : 1117 - 1122
  • [22] Image Analysis and Enhancement: General Methods and Biomedical Applications
    Krylov, A. S.
    Nasonov, A. V.
    Sorokin, D. V.
    Khvostikov, A. V.
    Pavelyeva, E. A.
    Pchelintsev, Ya. A.
    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2023, 33 (04) : 1493 - 1514
  • [23] Image Analysis and Enhancement: General Methods and Biomedical Applications
    A. S. Krylov
    A. V. Nasonov
    D. V. Sorokin
    A. V. Khvostikov
    E. A. Pavelyeva
    Ya. A. Pchelintsev
    Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis, 2023, 33 : 1493 - 1514
  • [24] Comparative Analysis of Different Techniques for Image Fusion
    Hu, Shigang
    Cao, Huiyi
    Wu, Xiaofeng
    Wu, Qingyang
    Tang, Zhijun
    Liu, Yunxin
    RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND INTERACTIVE APPLICATIONS (IISA2016), 2017, 541 : 275 - 281
  • [25] A Comparative Study of Different Feature Mapping Methods for Image Annotation
    Wang, Yiren
    Dawood, Hassan
    Yin, Qian
    Guo, Ping
    2015 SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (ICACI), 2015, : 340 - 344
  • [26] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT DIGITAL METHODS OF IMAGE CONTOURING
    LALYKO, LB
    PORFIREVA, NN
    SOVIET JOURNAL OF OPTICAL TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 52 (04): : 201 - 203
  • [27] Comparative analysis of Contrast Enhancement Techniques on different Images
    Raj, Deepa
    Mamoria, Pushpa
    2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), 2015, : 27 - 31
  • [28] Image enhancement methods for turbulence mitigation and the influence of different colour spaces
    Huebner, Claudia S.
    OPTICS IN ATMOSPHERIC PROPAGATION AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS XVIII, 2015, 9641
  • [29] Comparative analysis of different methods of rapid tooling
    Martin, C
    Sasutil, JV
    Kouhkan, M
    Lorea, E
    Noorani, R
    PRICM 5: THE FIFTH PACIFIC RIM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED MATERIALS AND PROCESSING, PTS 1-5, 2005, 475-479 : 2873 - 2876
  • [30] A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods
    Arun, P. V.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2013, 16 (02): : 133 - 139