A weighted rough set based fuzzy axiomatic design approach for the selection of AM processes

被引:38
|
作者
Zheng, Pai [1 ]
Wang, Yuanbin [1 ]
Xu, Xun [1 ]
Xie, Sheng Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Mech Engn, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Rough set; Fuzzy axiomatic design; Preference graph; Multi-attribute decision making; Relative importance rating; Additive manufacturing; PROTOTYPING PROCESS SELECTION; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; CRITERIA; PROPOSAL; RANKING; MODEL; QFD;
D O I
10.1007/s00170-016-9890-8
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing, as an enabling technology for mass customization or personalization, has been developed rapidly in recent years. Various design tools, materials, machines and service bureaus can be found in the market. Clearly, the choices are abundant, but users can be easily confused as to which AM process they should use. This paper first reviews the existing multi-attribute decision-making methods for AM process selection and assesses their suitability with regard to two aspects, preference rating flexibility and performance evaluation objectivity. We propose that an approach that is capable of handling incomplete attribute information and objective assessment within inherent data has advantages over other approaches. Based on this proposition, this paper proposes a weighted preference graph method for personalized preference evaluation and a rough set based fuzzy axiomatic design approach for performance evaluation and the selection of appropriate AM processes. An example based on the previous research work of AM machine selection is given to validate its robustness for the priori articulation of AM process selection decision support.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1990
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fuzzy Rough Set Prototype Selection for Regression
    Vluymans, Sarah
    Saeys, Yvan
    Cornelis, Chris
    Teredesai, Ankur
    De Cock, Martine
    [J]. 2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [42] A fuzzy rough set based fitting approach for fuzzy set-valued information system
    Ahmed W.
    Beg M.M.S.
    Ahmad T.
    [J]. International Journal of Information Technology, 2020, 12 (4) : 1355 - 1364
  • [43] FuzzySTAR: Fuzzy set theory of axiomatic design review
    Huang, GQ
    Jiang, ZH
    [J]. AI EDAM-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN ANALYSIS AND MANUFACTURING, 2002, 16 (04): : 291 - 302
  • [44] Selection of representative embankments based on rough set - fuzzy clustering method
    Ou Bin
    Lin Zhi-xiang
    Fu Shu-yan
    Gao Sheng-song
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING, 2018, 113
  • [45] Fuzzy extensions of the dominance-based rough set approach
    Palangetic, Marko
    Cornelis, Chris
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2021, 129 : 1 - 19
  • [46] Research on the Novel Weighted Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm based on Fuzzy Sets and Rough Set Theory
    Chen, Liwei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 CONFERENCE ON INFORMATIZATION IN EDUCATION, MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS, 2015, 20 : 7 - 11
  • [47] A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making
    Zhang, Zhiming
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2012, 36 (10) : 4605 - 4633
  • [48] Fraud detection in telecommunication: A rough fuzzy set based approach
    Xu, Wei
    Pang, Ye
    Ma, Jian
    Wang, Shou-Yang
    Hao, Gang
    Zeng, Shuo
    Qian, Yu-Hua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2008 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2008, : 1249 - +
  • [49] An incremental approach to hierarchical feature selection by applying fuzzy rough set technique
    She, Yanhong
    Wu, Jinlan
    He, Xiaoli
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (SUPPL 2) : 2571 - 2598
  • [50] An incremental approach to hierarchical feature selection by applying fuzzy rough set technique
    Yanhong She
    Jinlan Wu
    Xiaoli He
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2023, 56 : 2571 - 2598