Integrated evaluation of payments for ecosystem services programs in China: a systematic review

被引:23
|
作者
Yang, Wu [1 ]
Lu, Qiaoling [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Environm & Resource Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
PROTECTED AREAS; REGIONAL PAYMENT; EFFICIENCY; DEFORESTATION; BIODIVERSITY; RESTORATION; INVESTMENTS; POVERTY; BASIN;
D O I
10.1080/20964129.2018.1459867
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Introduction: During the past two decades, payments for ecosystem services (PES) program has become a popular conservation paradigm for realigning socioeconomic costs and benefits among different stakeholders. As billions of investment flows into the natural capital pool, there is growing interest to understand the ecological, economic, and social outcomes of PES programs. China is one of the countries that extensively implements PES programs. Although there is a growing interest to perform impact evaluation of China's massive PES programs, it is unclear that what existing literature has done, has not done, and should do in the future. Therefore, to guide further research and practices, we conduct a systematic review of studies on China's PES programs. Results: Our review shows that there are growing impact evaluation studies of PES programs in China. However, the spatial and ecosystem distributions of existing studies are quite uneven. Most case studies were poorly designed, rarely quantified, and evaluated without sophisticated methods. Among the three dimensions of ecological effectiveness, economic efficiency, and social equity, economic efficiency is the least studied. Discussion and Conclusion: We further discuss the challenges and opportunities and provide insights for future research. To improve the understanding and management of natural capital, we call for mainstreaming impact evaluation of ecosystem service policies in China and beyond following the state-of-art procedures.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:73 / 84
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Integrated assessments of payments for ecosystem services programs
    Liu, Jianguo
    Yang, Wu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2013, 110 (41) : 16297 - 16298
  • [2] Participation in payments for ecosystem services programs in the Global South: A systematic review
    Jones, Kelly W.
    Powlen, Kathryn
    Roberts, Ryan
    Shinbrot, Xoco
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2020, 45
  • [3] Assessment of ecosystem services in restoration programs in China: A systematic review
    Wen, Xin
    Theau, Jerome
    AMBIO, 2020, 49 (02) : 584 - 592
  • [4] Assessment of ecosystem services in restoration programs in China: A systematic review
    Xin Wen
    Jérôme Théau
    Ambio, 2020, 49 : 584 - 592
  • [5] Payments and penalties in ecosystem services programs
    Kim, Youngho
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Newburn, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 126
  • [6] Performance and prospects of payments for ecosystem services programs: Evidence from China
    Yang, Wu
    Liu, Wei
    Vina, Andres
    Luo, Junyan
    He, Guangming
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    Zhang, Hemin
    Liu, Jianguo
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 127 : 86 - 95
  • [7] Payments for ecosystem services programs: A global review of contributions towards sustainability
    Le, Tuyet-Anh T.
    Vodden, Kelly
    Wu, Jianghua
    Bullock, Ryan
    Sabau, Gabriela
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (01)
  • [8] Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs
    Sorice, Michael G.
    Josh Donlan, C.
    Boyle, Kevin J.
    Xu, Weibin
    Gelcich, Stefan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03):
  • [9] Ecological restoration programs and payments for ecosystem services as integrated biophysical and socioeconomic processes-China's experience as an example
    Yin, Runsheng
    Zhao, Minjuan
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 73 : 56 - 65
  • [10] Self-selection into payments for ecosystem services programs
    Jack, B. Kelsey
    Jayachandran, Seema
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (12) : 5326 - 5333