Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression

被引:160
|
作者
Wilkinson, GS [1 ]
Presgraves, DC
Crymes, L
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Zool, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Rochester, Dept Biol, Rochester, NY 14627 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/34640
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In some species, females choose mates possessing ornaments that predict offspring survival(1-5). However, sexual selection by female preference for male genetic quality(6-8) remains controversial because conventional genetic mechanisms maintain insufficient variation in male quality to account for costly preference and ornament evolution(9,10). Here we show that females prefer ornaments that indicate genetic quality generated by transmission conflict between the sex chromosomes, By comparing sex-ratio distributions in stalk-eyed fly (Cyrtodiopsis) progeny we found that female-biased sex ratios occur in species exhibiting eye-stalk sexual dimorphism(11,12) and female preferences for long eye span(13,14). Female-biased sex ratios result from meiotic drive(15), the preferential transmission of a 'selfish' X-chromosome. Artificial selection for 22 generations on male eye-stalk length in sexually dimorphic C. dalmanni produced longer eye-stalks and male-biased progeny sex ratios in replicate lines. Because male-biased progeny sex ratios occur when a drive-resistant Y chromosome pairs with a driving X chromosome(15), long eye span is genetically linked to meiotic drive: suppression. Male eye span therefore signals genetic quality by influencing the reproductive value of offspring(16).
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 279
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluctuating asymmetry of sexual and nonsexual traits in stalk-eyed flies: a poor indicator of developmental stress and genetic quality
    Bjorksten, T
    David, P
    Pomiankowski, A
    Fowler, K
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2000, 13 (01) : 89 - 97
  • [42] Heightened condition dependence is not a general feature of male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies (Diptera: Diopsidae)
    Cotton, S
    Fowler, K
    Pomiankowski, A
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2004, 17 (06) : 1310 - 1316
  • [43] New integrated evidences reveal male polymorphism and species delimitation in stalk-eyed fruit flies
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Ning, Huangfu
    Wang, Yong
    Zeng, Yu
    Chua, Tock H.
    Zhu, Chaodong
    ZOOLOGICA SCRIPTA, 2023, 52 (06) : 629 - 644
  • [44] The costs and benefits of high early mating rates in male stalk-eyed flies, Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni
    Pomiankowski, A
    Denniff, M
    Fowler, K
    Chapman, T
    JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 51 (10) : 1165 - 1171
  • [45] Genetic divergence does not predict change in ornament expression among populations of stalk-eyed flies
    Swallow, JG
    Wallace, LE
    Christianson, SJ
    Johns, PM
    Wilkinson, GS
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2005, 14 (12) : 3787 - 3800
  • [46] Wing size, wing shape and sexual dimorphism in eye-span in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae) (vol 98, pg 860, 2009)
    Ribak, Gal
    Pitts, Marie L.
    Wilkinson, Gerald S.
    Swallow, John G.
    BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2011, 102 (01) : 236 - 236
  • [47] Conservation of the expression of DII, en, and wg in the eye-antennal imaginal disc of stalk-eyed flies
    Hurley, I
    Fowler, K
    Pomiankowski, A
    Smith, H
    EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 3 (06) : 408 - 414
  • [48] Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?
    Gal Ribak
    John G. Swallow
    Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 2007, 193 : 1065 - 1079
  • [49] Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?
    Ribak, Gal
    Swallow, John G.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 193 (10): : 1065 - 1079
  • [50] No detectable genetic correlation between male and female mating frequency in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni
    Grant, CA
    Chapman, T
    Pomiankowski, A
    Fowler, K
    HEREDITY, 2005, 95 (06) : 444 - 448