Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided implantation of fiducial markers in the liver for stereotactic body radiation therapy

被引:28
|
作者
Park, So Hyun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Won, Hyung Jin [1 ,2 ]
Kim, So Yeon [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Moon [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Pyo Nyun [1 ,2 ]
Yoon, Sang Min [4 ]
Park, Jin-hong [4 ]
Kim, Jong Hoon [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Div Abdominal Radiol, Asan Med Ctr,Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Gachon Univ, Gil Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Incheon, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 06期
关键词
FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; RADIOTHERAPY; DISEASE; RADIOSURGERY; SONOGRAPHY; CYBERKNIFE; ABLATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0179676
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of a malignancy in the liver requires the perilesional implantation of fiducial markers for lesion detection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided marker implantation for SBRT. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 299, US-guided, intrahepatic fiducial markers implanted in 101 patients between November 2013 and September 2014. SBRT-planning CT images were analyzed to determine the technical success of the implantation, the mean distance between the tumor margin and the marker, with the ideal location of fiducials defined as the distance between a marker and a tumor less than 3 cm and the distance between markers greater than 2 cm according to the tumor conspicuity seen on gray-scale US and the artifact obscuring tumor margins. We also evaluated procedure-related major and minor complications. Results Technical success was achieved in 291 (97.3%) fiducial marker implantations. The mean distance between the tumor and the marker was 3.1 cm (S. D., 2.1 cm; range, 0-9.5 cm). Of 101 patients, 72 lesions (71.3%, 2.2 +/- 1.0 cm; range, 0-3.0 cm) had fiducial markers located in an ideal location. The ideal location of fiducials was more common in visible lesions than in poorly conspicuous lesions (90.2% vs. 52.0%, P < 0.001). Seventeen markers (5.8%) developed beam-hardening artifacts obscuring the tumor margins. There were no major complications, although 12 patients (11.9%) developed minor complications. Conclusions US-guided implantation of fiducial markers in the liver is an effective and safe procedure with only rare complications.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] POTENTIALS AND LIMITATIONS OF GUIDING LIVER STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY SET-UP ON LIVER-IMPLANTED FIDUCIAL MARKERS
    Wunderink, Wouter
    Romero, Alejandra Mendez
    Seppenwoolde, Yvette
    de Boer, Hans
    Levendag, Peter
    Heijmen, Ben
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (05): : 1573 - 1583
  • [22] Implant geometry and detection rates of prostate fiducial markers after transrectal ultrasound-guided perineal implantation for image-guided 6D-tracking in robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy
    Gruen, Arne
    Heil, Katharina
    Zips, Daniel
    Kalinauskaite, Goda
    Boehmer, Dirk
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2025,
  • [23] The feasibility, safety, and technique of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fiducial marker placement for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer
    Vignesh, S.
    Hoffe, S. E.
    Shridhar, R.
    Klapman, J.
    Barthel, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [24] Can an ultrasound replace fiducial markers for prostate image-guided radiation therapy?
    Johnston, H.
    Hilts, M.
    Beckham, W.
    Berthelet, E.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S26 - S26
  • [25] EUS-GUIDED PLACEMENT OF NEW GOLDEN FIDUCIAL MARKERS IN STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY IN LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF FEASIBILITY AND SAFETY
    Auriemma, F.
    Di Leo, M.
    Comito, T.
    Lamonaca, L.
    Fugazza, A.
    Anderloni, A.
    Bossi, P.
    Maselli, R.
    Ferrara, E. C.
    Galtieri, P. A.
    Scorsetti, M.
    Repici, A.
    Carrara, S.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2019, 51 : E82 - E83
  • [26] Safety and LC of Repeat Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
    Evans, J. R.
    Balter, J. M.
    Lawrence, T. S.
    Feng, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S325 - S325
  • [27] Safety and Efficacy of Liver Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Elderly Patients
    Lewy, J. R.
    Schipper, M.
    Evans, J. R., Jr.
    Patil, P.
    Lawrence, T. S.
    Cuneo, K. C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E176 - E177
  • [28] A Prospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Patients With Prior Liver-Directed Therapy
    Moon, D. H.
    Wang, A. Z.
    Tepper, J. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E172 - E172
  • [29] EUS-guided placement of fiducial markers for stereotactic body radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer: feasibility, security and a new quality score
    Figueiredo, Mariana
    Bouchart, Christelle
    Moretti, Luigi
    Mans, Laura
    Engelholm, Jean-Luc
    Bali, Maria-Antonietta
    Van Laethem, Jean-Luc
    Eisendrath, Pierre
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2021, 09 (02) : E253 - E257
  • [30] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Efficacy and Safety
    Roquette, Isaure
    Bogart, Emilie
    Lacornerie, Thomas
    Ningarhari, Massih
    Bibault, Jean-Emmanuel
    Le Deley, Marie-Cecile
    Lartigau, Eric F.
    Pasquier, David
    Mirabel, Xavier
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (16)