Reliability and Validity of the Assessment for Disaster Engagement with Partners Tool (ADEPT) for Local Health Departments

被引:13
|
作者
Glik, Deborah C. [1 ]
Eisenman, David P. [1 ,2 ]
Donatello, Ian [3 ]
Afifi, Abdelmonem [3 ]
Stajura, Michael [1 ]
Prelip, Michael L. [1 ]
Sammartinova, Jitka [1 ]
Martel, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATIONS; PUBLIC-HEALTH; EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS; HURRICANE-KATRINA; COMMUNITY; COLLABORATION; NATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/00333549141296S411
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective. This study presents reliability and validity findings for the Assessment for Disaster Engagement with Partners Tool (ADEPT), an instrument that can be used to monitor the frequency and nature of collaborative activities between local health departments (LHDs) and community-based organizations (CBOs) and faith-based organizations (FBOs) for disaster preparedness, response, and recovery. Methods. We used formative research to develop the instrument by ranking LHDs according to their disaster outreach and engagement activities. We validated the scale through a 2011 national survey of disaster preparedness coordinators (n=273) working in LHDs. We reduced the original measure of 25 items to a final measure comprising 15 items with four dimensions: (1) communication outreach and coordination, (2) resource mobilization, (3) organizational capacity building, and (4) partnership development and maintenance. We used internal consistency reliability m correlation and factor analysis to validate the measure. Results. Using internal consistency reliability, we found reasonable inter-item reliability for the four hypothesized dimensions (Cronbach's alpha: 0.71-0.88). These four dimensions were confirmed through correlation and factor analysis (Varimax rotation). Conclusion. Higher scores on all four dimensions of ADEPT for organizational respondents suggest that more activities were conducted for inter-organizational preparedness in those organizations than in organizations whose respondents had lower scores. This finding implies that organizations with higher ADEPT scores have more active relationships with CBOs/FBOs in the realm of preparedness, a key element for creating community resilience for emergencies and disaster preparedness.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The oral health assessment tool - Validity and reliability
    Chalmers, JM
    King, PL
    Spencer, AJ
    Wright, FAC
    Carter, KD
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2005, 50 (03) : 191 - 199
  • [2] Testing the Validity and Reliability of the Adapted Health Communication Assessment Tool©
    Baird, Tamara
    Corey, Virginia Ruth
    Sissom, Jenna
    Weber, Jennifer
    Campbell, Suzanne Hetzel
    [J]. CLINICAL SIMULATION IN NURSING, 2021, 52 : 50 - 58
  • [3] Local Health Departments' Partners and Challenges in Electronic Exchange of Health Information
    Shah, Gulzar H.
    Vest, Joshua R.
    Lovelace, Kay
    Mac McCullough, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE, 2016, 22 : S44 - S50
  • [4] Validity and reliability of Korean version Competency Assessment Tool-Mental Health
    Hyun Mee Cho
    Jeong Won Han
    Eun Joung Choi
    Hyo Eun Jeong
    Bo Ram Hong
    Eun Yong Kim
    [J]. Frontiers of Nursing, 2020, (02) : 143 - 152
  • [5] Validity and reliability of Korean version Competency Assessment Tool-Mental Health
    Hyun Mee Cho
    Jeong Won Han
    Eun Joung Choi
    Hyo Eun Jeong
    Bo Ram Hong
    Eun Yong Kim
    [J]. Frontiers of Nursing., 2020, 7 (02) - 152
  • [6] Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Discharge Assessment Tool
    Girgin, Burcu Aykanat
    Cimete, Gueler
    [J]. JOURNAL FOR SPECIALISTS IN PEDIATRIC NURSING, 2016, 21 (02) : 74 - 83
  • [7] Evidence of validity and reliability of a phonological assessment tool
    Ceron, Marizete Ilha
    Gubiani, Marileda Barichello
    de Oliveira, Camila Rosa
    Keske-Soares, Marcia
    [J]. CODAS, 2018, 30 (03):
  • [8] Validity and Reliability of the Hippotherapy Evaluation and Assessment Tool
    Shotwell, Mary
    Weissman-Miller, Deborah
    Malone, Tara
    O'Kelley, Brooke
    Post, Elizabeth
    Alvarado, Irma
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2017, 71 (04):
  • [9] Reliability and Validity of the Italian Eating Assessment Tool
    Schindler, Antonio
    Mozzanica, Francesco
    Monzani, Anna
    Ceriani, Eleonora
    Atac, Murat
    Jukic-Peladic, Nikolina
    Venturini, Claudia
    Orlandoni, Paolo
    [J]. ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2013, 122 (11): : 717 - 724
  • [10] The validity and reliability of a signal impact assessment tool
    Rolfes, Lean
    Kolfschoten, Judith
    van Hunsel, Florence
    van Puijenbroek, Eugene
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 815 - 819