Multicenter Evaluation of the Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

被引:0
|
作者
Bailey, Adam L. [1 ]
Armstrong, Tom [2 ]
Dwivedi, Hari-Prakash [2 ]
Denys, Gerald A. [3 ]
Hindler, Janet [4 ]
Campeau, Shelley [4 ,6 ]
Traczewski, Maria [5 ]
Humphries, Romney [4 ,6 ]
Burnham, Carey-Ann D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Immunol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] bioMerieux Inc, Hazelwood, MO USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Clin Microbiol Inst Inc, Wilsonville, OR USA
[6] Accelerate Diagnost, Tucson, AZ USA
关键词
antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Etest; gradient diffusion method; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Enterobacteriaceae; ceftolozane-tazobactam; IN-VITRO ACTIVITY; COMPLICATED INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM; KLEBSIELLA-PNEUMONIAE; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; LEVOFLOXACIN; HOSPITALS;
D O I
10.1128/JCM.00717-18
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) is a novel beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2014 for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (in combination with metronidazole) and complicated urinary tract infections. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the C/T Etest, a gradient diffusion method. C/T Etest was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) for 51 Enterobacteriaceae challenge isolates and 39 Pseudomonas aeruginosa challenge isolates at three clinical sites. Essential agreement (EA) between the methods ranged from 47 to 49/51 (92.2 to 96.1%) for the Enterobacteriaceae, and categorical agreement (CA) ranged from 49 to 51/51 (96.1 to 100.0%). EA and CA for P. aeruginosa were 100% at all sites. The C/T Etest was also compared to BMD for susceptibility testing on 966 clinical isolates (793 Enterobacteriaceae, including 167 Klebsiella pneumoniae and 159 Escherichia coil isolates, in addition to 173 P. aeruginosa isolates) collected at four clinical sites. EA between Etest and BMD was 96.9% for Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 98.8% for P. aeruginosa isolates. Within the Enterobacteriaceae, isolates from each species examined had >96% CA. For the clinical isolates, no very major errors were identified but two major errors were found (one for K. pneumoniae and one for Providencia rettgers). By BMD, 47.0% of Enterobacteriaceae and 46.2% of P. aeruginosa challenge strains were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria; 8.2% of clinical Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 12.1% of clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were nonsusceptible to C/T by CLSI breakpoint criteria. In conclusion, Etest is accurate and reproducible for C/T susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multicenter Evaluation of the New Etest Gradient Diffusion Method for Piperacillin-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii Complex
    Garcia-Fernandez, Sergio
    Bala, Yohann
    Armstrong, Tom
    Garcia-Castillo, Maria
    Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    Wallace, Meghan A.
    Hardy, Dwight
    Zambardi, Gilles
    Canton, Rafael
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (02)
  • [2] RETRACTION: Comparison of Etest to Broth Microdilution for Testing of Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam (Retraction of Vol 55, Pg 334, 2017)
    Flynt, Lauren K.
    Veve, Michael P.
    Samuel, Linoj P.
    Tibbetts, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (06)
  • [3] Verification of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing Methods against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Shields, Ryan K.
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Pasculle, A. William
    Press, Ellen G.
    Haidar, Ghady
    Hao, Binghua
    Chen, Liang
    Kreiswirth, Barry N.
    Nguyen, M. Hong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 56 (02)
  • [4] RETRACTED: Comparison of Etest to Broth Microdilution for Testing of Susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam (Retracted article. See vol. 56, 2018)
    Flynt, Lauren K.
    Veve, Michael P.
    Samuel, Linoj P.
    Tibbetts, Robert J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2017, 55 (01) : 334 - 335
  • [5] Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Multicenter Study
    Gallagher, Jason C.
    Satlin, Michael J.
    Elabor, Abdulrahman
    Saraiya, Nidhi
    McCreary, Erin K.
    Molnar, Esther
    El-Beyrouty, Claudine
    Jones, Bruce M.
    Dixit, Deepali
    Heil, Emily L.
    Claeys, Kimberly C.
    Hiles, Jon
    Vyas, Nikunj M.
    Bland, Christopher M.
    Suh, Jin
    Biason, Kenneth
    McCoy, Dorothy
    King, Madeline A.
    Richards, Lynette
    Harrington, Nicole
    Guo, Yi
    Chaudhry, Saira
    Lu, Xiaoning
    Yu, Daohai
    OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 5 (11):
  • [6] Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of Etest Meropenem-Vaborbactam (bioMerieux) for Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Jean, Sophonie
    Garrett, Sheri
    Anglade, Claire
    Bridon, Laurence
    Davies, Leanne
    Garner, Omai B.
    Richards, Jennifer
    Wallace, Meghan
    Wootton, Mandy
    Burnham, Carey-Ann D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (01)
  • [7] Comparative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest versus Broth Microdilution for Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Papadomanolaki, Arhodoula
    Siopi, Maria
    Karakosta, Polyxeni
    Vourli, Sophia
    Pournaras, Spyros
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (07):
  • [8] Deciphering the Evolution of Cephalosporin Resistance to Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Barnes, Melissa D.
    Taracila, Magdalena A.
    Rutter, Joseph D.
    Bethel, Christopher R.
    Galdadas, Ioannis
    Hujer, Andrea M.
    Caselli, Emilia
    Prati, Fabio
    Dekker, John P.
    Papp-Wallace, Krisztina M.
    Haider, Shozeb
    Bonomo, Robert A.
    MBIO, 2018, 9 (06):
  • [9] Performance of disc diffusion, MIC gradient tests and Vitek 2 for ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam susceptibility testing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
    Daragon, Brice
    Fournier, Damien
    Plesiat, Patrick
    Jeannot, Katy
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 76 (10) : 2586 - 2592
  • [10] Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Hungary
    O'Neall, Dustin
    Juhasz, Emese
    Toth, Akos
    Urban, Edit
    Szabo, Judit
    Melegh, Szilvia
    Katona, Katalin
    Kristof, Katalin
    ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2020, 67 (01) : 61 - 65