Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: Data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants

被引:39
|
作者
Dorman, MF [1 ]
Loizou, PC
Kemp, LL
Kirk, KI
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2000年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-200012000-00006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The aims of this study were 1) to determine the number of channels of stimulation needed by normal-hearing adults and children to achieve a high level of word recognition and 2) to compare the performance of normal-hearing children and adults listening to speech processed into 6 to 20 channels of stimulation with the performance of children who use the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Design: In Experiment 1, the words from the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) mere processed into 6 to 20 channels and output as the sum of sine waves at the center frequency of the analysis bands. The signals were presented to normal-hearing adults and children for identification In Experiment 2, the wideband recordings of the MLNT words were presented to early-implanted and late-implanted children who used the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Results: Experiment 1: Normal-hearing children needed more channels of stimulation than adults to recognize words. Ten channels allowed 99% correct word recognition for adults; 12 channels allowed 92% correct word recognition for children. Experiment 2: The average level of intelligibility for both early-and late-implanted children was equivalent to that found for normal-hearing adults listening to four to six channels of stimulation. The best intelligibility for implanted children was equivalent to that found for normal-hearing adults listening to six channels of stimulation. The distribution of scores for early- and late-implanted children differed. Nineteen percent of the fate-implanted children achieved scores below that allowed by a 6-channel processor, None of the early-implanted children fell into this category. Conclusions: The average implanted child must deal with a signal that is significantly degraded. This is likely to prolong the period of language acquisition. The period could be significantly shortened if implants were able to deliver at least eight functional channels of stimulation. Twelve functional channels of stimulation would provide signals near the intelligibility of wideband signals in quiet.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 596
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Overimitation of Children With Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids in Comparison With Children With Normal Hearing
    Wang, Zhidan
    Zhu, Xiaoyu
    Fong, Frankie T. K.
    Meng, Jing
    Wang, Haijing
    [J]. INFANTS & YOUNG CHILDREN, 2020, 33 (01): : 84 - 92
  • [22] Consonant Production Skills in Children with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Children Aged 3-5 Years
    Sohrabi, Mitra
    Jalilevand, Nahid
    [J]. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (02): : 98 - 103
  • [23] Home Auditory Environments of Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Normal Hearing
    Wang, Yuanyuan
    Cooke, Molly
    Reed, Jessa
    Dilley, Laura
    Houston, Derek M.
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2022, 43 (02): : 592 - 604
  • [24] Spatial Speech Perception Benefits in Young Children With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants
    Van Deun, Lieselot
    van Wieringen, Astrid
    Wouters, Jan
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2010, 31 (05): : 702 - 713
  • [25] Speech Recognition in Noise 5-Year-Old Normal-Hearing Children
    Hagerman, Bjorn
    Hermansson, Emma
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY AND AUDIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (01): : 52 - 60
  • [26] A Comparison of Vowel Productions in Prelingually Deaf Children Using Cochlear Implants, Severe Hearing-Impaired Children Using Conventional Hearing Aids and Normal-Hearing Children
    Baudonck, N.
    Van Lierde, K.
    Dhooge, I.
    Corthals, P.
    [J]. FOLIA PHONIATRICA ET LOGOPAEDICA, 2011, 63 (03) : 154 - 160
  • [27] Perception of suprasegmental features of speech by children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids
    Most, Tova
    Peled, Miriam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEAF STUDIES AND DEAF EDUCATION, 2007, 12 (03): : 350 - 361
  • [28] The Developmental Trajectory of Spatial Listening Skills in Normal-Hearing Children
    Lovett, Rosemary Elizabeth Susan
    Kitterick, Padraig Thomas
    Huang, Shan
    Summerfield, Arthur Quentin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2012, 55 (03): : 865 - 878
  • [29] Speech recognition in children with hearing aids versus results in children with implants
    Lohle, E
    Falley, U
    Laszig, R
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1997, 18 (06): : S155 - S156
  • [30] Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children
    Lee, KYS
    van Hasselt, CA
    Chiu, SN
    Cheung, DMC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 63 (02) : 137 - 147