Word recognition by children listening to speech processed into a small number of channels: Data from normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants

被引:39
|
作者
Dorman, MF [1 ]
Loizou, PC
Kemp, LL
Kirk, KI
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Hlth Sci Ctr, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Texas Dallas, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[4] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Indianapolis, IN USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2000年 / 21卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00003446-200012000-00006
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: The aims of this study were 1) to determine the number of channels of stimulation needed by normal-hearing adults and children to achieve a high level of word recognition and 2) to compare the performance of normal-hearing children and adults listening to speech processed into 6 to 20 channels of stimulation with the performance of children who use the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Design: In Experiment 1, the words from the Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test (MLNT) mere processed into 6 to 20 channels and output as the sum of sine waves at the center frequency of the analysis bands. The signals were presented to normal-hearing adults and children for identification In Experiment 2, the wideband recordings of the MLNT words were presented to early-implanted and late-implanted children who used the Nucleus 22 cochlear implant. Results: Experiment 1: Normal-hearing children needed more channels of stimulation than adults to recognize words. Ten channels allowed 99% correct word recognition for adults; 12 channels allowed 92% correct word recognition for children. Experiment 2: The average level of intelligibility for both early-and late-implanted children was equivalent to that found for normal-hearing adults listening to four to six channels of stimulation. The best intelligibility for implanted children was equivalent to that found for normal-hearing adults listening to six channels of stimulation. The distribution of scores for early- and late-implanted children differed. Nineteen percent of the fate-implanted children achieved scores below that allowed by a 6-channel processor, None of the early-implanted children fell into this category. Conclusions: The average implanted child must deal with a signal that is significantly degraded. This is likely to prolong the period of language acquisition. The period could be significantly shortened if implants were able to deliver at least eight functional channels of stimulation. Twelve functional channels of stimulation would provide signals near the intelligibility of wideband signals in quiet.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 596
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Self-Monitoring of Listening Abilities in Normal-Hearing Children, Normal-Hearing Adults, and Children with Cochlear Implants
    Rothpletz, Ann M.
    Wightman, Frederic L.
    Kistler, Doris J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) : 206 - 221
  • [2] Mandarin Consonant Contrast Recognition Among Children With Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids and Normal-Hearing Children
    Liu, Qiaoyun
    Zhou, Ning
    Berger, Rebecca
    Huang, Daniel
    Xu, Li
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 471 - 476
  • [3] Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants
    Mao, Yitao
    Xu, Li
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 : S23 - S30
  • [4] Some aspects of language development in normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants
    Szagun, G
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1997, 18 (06): : S131 - S134
  • [5] Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing
    Chin, SB
    Tsai, PL
    Gao, SJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2003, 12 (04) : 440 - 451
  • [6] Speech Intonation and Melodic Contour Recognition in Children With Cochlear Implants and With Normal Hearing
    See, Rachel L.
    Driscoll, Virginia D.
    Gfeller, Kate
    Kliethermes, Stephanie
    Oleson, Jacob
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (03) : 490 - 498
  • [7] Assessing Multimodal Spoken Word-in-Sentence Recognition in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Cochlear Implants
    Holt, Rachael Frush
    Kirk, Karen Iler
    Hay-McCutcheon, Marcia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2011, 54 (02): : 632 - 657
  • [8] Segregation of competing speech in adults and children with normal hearing and in children with cochlear implants
    Liu, Ji-Sheng
    Liu, Yang-Wenyi
    Yu, Ya-Feng
    Galvin, John J., III
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Tao, Duo-Duo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 150 (01): : 339 - 352
  • [9] Speech Intelligibility in Children with Cochlear Implants Compared to Normal-Hearing Peers Matched for Chronological Age and Hearing Age
    Tavakoli, Mahdiye
    Jalilevand, Nahid
    Kamali, Mohammad
    Modarresi, Yahya
    Zarandy, Masoud Motasaddi
    [J]. AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03): : 232 - 237
  • [10] Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants
    Mitani, Chisato
    Nakata, Takayuki
    Trehub, Sandra E.
    Kanda, Yukihiko
    Kumagami, Hidetaka
    Takasaki, Kenji
    Miyamoto, Ikue
    Takahashi, Haruo
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2007, 28 (02): : 29S - 33S