Possible predisposing factors for the second hip fracture

被引:93
|
作者
Dretakis, KE [1 ]
Dretakis, EK [1 ]
Papakitsou, EF [1 ]
Psarakis, S [1 ]
Steriopoulos, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Ctr Study Osteoporot Fractures, Heraklion 71110, Crete, Greece
关键词
hip fracture; bilateral; type; second; risk;
D O I
10.1007/s002239900446
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Among 1685 patients who sustained a hip fracture at the island of Crete (Greece) in a 4-year period we found 106 patients with bilateral noncontemporary hip fractures. Pathologic hip fractures and fractures that emerged from high energy trauma were excluded. To investigate the possible factors predisposing to the later fracture in the sound hip, we studied these 106 patients and compared them with the 1579 patients who sustained a single hip fracture (control group). There was no significant difference between the mean age of the bilateral group at the One of the first hip fracture (78.3 +/- 7.4 years, range 52-94 years) and the mean age of the control,group (77.3 +/- 11.9 years, range 50-101 years). We found no significant difference in the bone status between the two groups, using both lumbar spine dual photon absorptiometry (DXA) and calcaneus broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA). Falls, which were the main cause of all the hip fractures, were much more common in the bilateral group. The second hip fracture was of the same location (trochanteric or cervical) in 92% of the trochanteric and 68% of cervical fractures and a tendency to greater displacement or instability was observed. Of the second hip fractures 75% happened in the first 48 months after the first one. The mean interval time was much longer (160 months) when a neck fracture was followed by a trochanteric one.
引用
收藏
页码:366 / 369
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Incidence and risk factors for second hip fracture: The framingham osteoporosis study.
    Berry, S. D.
    Lu, M.
    Hannan, M. T.
    Samelson, E. J.
    McLean, R. R.
    Cupples, A. L.
    Kiel, D. P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2006, 21 : S106 - S106
  • [22] RISK FACTORS FOR POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS DO NOT CHARACTERIZE PREDICTORS FOR SECOND HIP FRACTURE
    Fernandez Tormos, E.
    Limousin Aranzabal, B.
    Arraiz Diaz, C.
    Marn Pena, O.
    Larrainzar Garijo, R.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : S196 - S196
  • [23] Radiological predisposing factors or hip osteoarthritis progression.
    Nguyen, M
    Berdah, L
    Lequesne, M
    Mazieres, B
    Vignon, E
    Dougados, M
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1996, 39 (09): : 863 - 863
  • [24] Contralateral hip fractures - can predisposing factors be determined?
    Saxena, P
    Shankar, J
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2000, 31 (06): : 421 - 424
  • [25] Hip Fracture Incidence in a Teaching Hospital: Intervention for the Prevention of Second Hip Fracture
    Gonzalez-Gimenez, Xavier
    Gomez-Vaquero, Carmen
    Valencia-Muntala, Lidia
    Zacarias, Andrea
    Martin, Irene
    Tramunt, Carles
    Redondo, Ana-Belen
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 71
  • [26] A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE SECOND HIP FRACTURE
    Crilly, R. G.
    Gutmanis, I.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : S483 - S483
  • [27] Outcome following a second hip fracture
    Pearse, EO
    Redfern, D
    Sinha, M
    Edge, A
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2003, 34 (07): : 518 - 521
  • [28] Second hip fracture in elderly hip fracture patients: Cost and effectiveness of fracture prevention treatment
    Segal, E
    Gurevich, B
    Zinnman, C
    Zibtziner, M
    Ish-Shalom, S
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 : S69 - S69
  • [29] Second hip fracture in elderly patients
    Atik, O. Sahap
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 25 (03): : 125 - 125
  • [30] Second hip fracture in elderly hip fracture patients: cost and effectiveness of fracture prevention treatment
    Segal, E
    Zinnman, C
    Raz, B
    Tamir, A
    Gurevich, B
    Siebzehner, MI
    Ish-Shalom, S
    AGE AND AGEING, 2005, 34 (05) : 507 - 510