Effects of camera viewing angles on tracking kinematic gait patterns using Azure Kinect, Kinect v2 and Orbbec Astra Pro v2

被引:80
|
作者
Yeung, Ling-Fung [1 ]
Yang, Zhenqun [1 ]
Cheng, Kenneth Chik-Chi [1 ]
Du, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Raymond Kai-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Biomed Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Motion capture; Depth sensor; Accuracy; Treadmill walking; Kinematics; MICROSOFT KINECT; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; POSE TRACKING; RELIABILITY; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Depth sensors could be a portable, affordable, marker-less alternative to three-dimension motion capture systems for gait analysis, but the effects of camera viewing angles on their joint angle tracking performance have not been fully investigated. Research questions: This study evaluated the accuracies of three depth sensors [Azure Kinect (AK); Kinect v2 (K2); Orbbec Astra (OA)] for tracking kinematic gait patterns during treadmill walking at five camera viewing angles (0 degrees /22.5 degrees/45 degrees/67.5 degrees /90 degrees). Methods: Ten healthy subjects performed fifteen treadmill walking trials (3 speeds x 5 viewing angles) using the three depth sensors to measure joint angles in sagittal hip, frontal hip, sagittal knee, and sagittal ankle. Ten walking steps were recorded and averaged for each walking trial. Range of motion in terms of maximum and minimum joint angles measured by the depth sensors were compared with the Vicon motion capture system as the gold standard. Depth sensors tracking accuracies were compared against the Vicon reference using rootmean-square error (RMSE) on the joint angle time series. Effects of different walking speeds, viewing angles, and depth sensors on the tracking accuracy were observed using three-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: ANOVA results on RMSE showed significant interaction effects between viewing angles and depth sensors for sagittal hip [F(8,72) = 4.404, p = 0.005] and for sagittal knee [F(8,72)=13.211, p < 0.001] joint angles. AK had better tracking performance when subjects walked at non-frontal camera viewing angles (22.5 degrees/45 degrees/67.5 degrees/90 degrees); while K2 performed better at frontal viewing angle (0 degrees). The superior tracking performance of AK compared with K2/OA might be attributed to the improved depth sensor resolution and body tracking algorithm. Significance: Researchers should be cautious about camera viewing angle when using depth sensors for kinematic gait measurements. Our results demonstrated Azure Kinect had good tracking performance of sagittal hip and sagittal knee joint angles during treadmill walking tests at non-frontal camera viewing angles.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Translation of Sign Language Into Text Using Kinect for Windows v2
    Amatya, Preeti
    Sergieieva, Kateryna
    Meixner, Gerrit
    ACHI 2018: THE ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTIONS, 2018, : 19 - 26
  • [42] Facial Recognition and Recall Using Kinect V2 for Patient Verification
    Silverstein, E.
    Snyder, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3718 - 3718
  • [43] VIRTUAL SPORTS TRAINING SYSTEM USING KINECT V2 SENSOR
    Alabbasi, Hesham
    Gradinaru, Alex
    Moldoveanu, Florica
    Moldoveanu, Alin
    UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 78 (04): : 17 - 30
  • [44] Kinect v2 tracked Body Joint Smoothing for Kinematic Analysis in Musculoskeletal Disorders
    Mangal, Naveen Kumar
    Tiwari, Anil Kumar
    42ND ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY: ENABLING INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR GLOBAL HEALTHCARE EMBC'20, 2020, : 5769 - 5772
  • [45] A Reliable Robot Workspace Monitoring System Using Kinect v2
    Mohan, Jithin
    Ashok, S.
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT INNOVATIONS IN ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICRIEECE 2018), 2018, : 686 - 689
  • [46] Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Windows v2 for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters
    Dolatabadi, Elham
    Taati, Babak
    Mihailidis, Alex
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2016, 38 (09) : 952 - 958
  • [47] Kinect v2 for Mobile Robot Navigation: Evaluation and Modeling
    Fankhauser, Peter
    Bloesch, Michael
    Rodriguez, Diego
    Kaestner, Ralf
    Hutter, Marco
    Siegwart, Roland
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED ROBOTICS (ICAR), 2015, : 388 - 394
  • [48] Kinect v2 Accuracy as a Body Segment Measuring Tool
    Bernal, V. Espinoza
    Satterthwaite, N. A.
    Napoli, A.
    Glass, S. M.
    Tucker, C. A.
    Obeid, I.
    2017 IEEE SIGNAL PROCESSING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM (SPMB), 2017,
  • [49] A depth image acquisition platform based on Kinect V2
    Zhai, Yu
    Qu, Yanlin
    Xu, Peng
    Li, Mengyao
    Han, Shaokun
    AOPC 2021: OPTICAL SENSING AND IMAGING TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 12065
  • [50] Evaluating and Improving the Depth Accuracy of Kinect for Windows v2
    Yang, Lin
    Zhang, Longyu
    Dong, Haiwei
    Alelaiwi, Abdulhameed
    El Saddik, Abdulmotaleb
    IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (08) : 4275 - 4285