Effects of camera viewing angles on tracking kinematic gait patterns using Azure Kinect, Kinect v2 and Orbbec Astra Pro v2

被引:80
|
作者
Yeung, Ling-Fung [1 ]
Yang, Zhenqun [1 ]
Cheng, Kenneth Chik-Chi [1 ]
Du, Dan [1 ,2 ]
Tong, Raymond Kai-Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Biomed Engn, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Coll Comp Sci, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Motion capture; Depth sensor; Accuracy; Treadmill walking; Kinematics; MICROSOFT KINECT; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; POSE TRACKING; RELIABILITY; PARAMETERS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.04.005
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Depth sensors could be a portable, affordable, marker-less alternative to three-dimension motion capture systems for gait analysis, but the effects of camera viewing angles on their joint angle tracking performance have not been fully investigated. Research questions: This study evaluated the accuracies of three depth sensors [Azure Kinect (AK); Kinect v2 (K2); Orbbec Astra (OA)] for tracking kinematic gait patterns during treadmill walking at five camera viewing angles (0 degrees /22.5 degrees/45 degrees/67.5 degrees /90 degrees). Methods: Ten healthy subjects performed fifteen treadmill walking trials (3 speeds x 5 viewing angles) using the three depth sensors to measure joint angles in sagittal hip, frontal hip, sagittal knee, and sagittal ankle. Ten walking steps were recorded and averaged for each walking trial. Range of motion in terms of maximum and minimum joint angles measured by the depth sensors were compared with the Vicon motion capture system as the gold standard. Depth sensors tracking accuracies were compared against the Vicon reference using rootmean-square error (RMSE) on the joint angle time series. Effects of different walking speeds, viewing angles, and depth sensors on the tracking accuracy were observed using three-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results: ANOVA results on RMSE showed significant interaction effects between viewing angles and depth sensors for sagittal hip [F(8,72) = 4.404, p = 0.005] and for sagittal knee [F(8,72)=13.211, p < 0.001] joint angles. AK had better tracking performance when subjects walked at non-frontal camera viewing angles (22.5 degrees/45 degrees/67.5 degrees/90 degrees); while K2 performed better at frontal viewing angle (0 degrees). The superior tracking performance of AK compared with K2/OA might be attributed to the improved depth sensor resolution and body tracking algorithm. Significance: Researchers should be cautious about camera viewing angle when using depth sensors for kinematic gait measurements. Our results demonstrated Azure Kinect had good tracking performance of sagittal hip and sagittal knee joint angles during treadmill walking tests at non-frontal camera viewing angles.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Accuracy of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2
    Kurillo, Gregorij
    Hemingway, Evan
    Cheng, Mu-Lin
    Cheng, Louis
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (07)
  • [2] Skeleton Tracking Accuracy and Precision Evaluation of Kinect V1, Kinect V2, and the Azure Kinect
    Tolgyessy, Michal
    Dekan, Martin
    Chovanec, Lubos
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [3] Comparing the Drop Vertical Jump Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect to the Kinect V2
    Abdelnour, Patrik
    Zhao, Kevin Y.
    Babouras, Athanasios
    Corban, Jason Philip Aaron Hiro
    Karatzas, Nicolaos
    Fevens, Thomas
    Martineau, Paul Andre
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (12)
  • [4] Evaluation of the Azure Kinect and Its Comparison to Kinect V1 and Kinect V2
    Tolgyessy, Michal
    Dekan, Martin
    Chovanec, Lubos
    Hubinsky, Peter
    SENSORS, 2021, 21 (02) : 1 - 25
  • [5] Respiratory Motion Tracking Using Kinect V2
    Silverstein, E.
    Snyder, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3651 - 3651
  • [6] Evaluation of the Pose Tracking Performance of the Azure Kinect and Kinect v2 for Gait Analysis in Comparison with a Gold Standard: A Pilot Study
    Albert, Justin Amadeus
    Owolabi, Victor
    Gebel, Arnd
    Brahms, Clemens Markus
    Granacher, Urs
    Arnrich, Bert
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (18) : 1 - 22
  • [7] BEAMFORMING WITH KINECT V2
    Gombots, Stefan
    Egner, Felix
    Kaltenbacher, Manfred
    5. TAGUNG INNOVATION MESSTECHNIK, 2017, : 76 - 81
  • [8] Evaluation of lower extremity gait analysis using Kinect V2® tracking system
    Usami, Takuya
    Nishida, Kazuki
    Iguchi, Hirotaka
    Okumura, Taro
    Sakai, Hiroaki
    Ida, Ruido
    Horiba, Mitsuya
    Kashima, Shuuto
    Sahashi, Kento
    Asai, Hayato
    Nagaya, Yuko
    Murakami, Hideki
    Ueki, Yoshino
    Kuroyanagi, Gen
    SICOT-J, 2022, 8
  • [9] Comparison between the Kinect™ V1 and Kinect™ V2 for Respiratory Motion Tracking
    Samir, Mohammed
    Golkar, Ehsan
    Rahni, Ashrani Aizzuddin Abd.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING APPLICATIONS (ICSIPA), 2015, : 150 - 155
  • [10] Measurement of Sleep Data Using Kinect V2 and Thermovision Camera
    Seo, Kwi-Bin
    Kim, Sung-Yeup
    Hong, Min
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2017, 23 (12) : 12762 - 12768