Does Student's Cognitive Flexibility Decrease During Pandemic? A New Approach to Measure Cognitive Flexibility

被引:0
|
作者
Cambaz, Huseyin Zahid [1 ]
Unal, Gulten [1 ]
机构
[1] Ankara Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Psychol Dept, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
cognitive flexibility; performance measurement; emotional word; COVID-19; vulnerability; fear; perceived risk; PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY; MENTAL-HEALTH; SELF-REPORT; RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; VALIDITY; THINKING; ANXIETY; NEED;
D O I
10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-1-13-22
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to examine the cognitive flexibility before and during the COVID-19 pandemic through a different performance measurement suitable for online application. In the study, three different data collected in 2019 (T19), 2020 (T20) and 2021 (T21) were compared with both within- and between-subject designs. One-hundred-and-twenty-three university students were included in the study for within-subjects, 239 for between-subject. According to the findings of the study, the cognitive flexibility of the students who continue formal education in T19 is higher than the students who continue distance education in T20 according to both within-subject and between-subject design. Besides, in both designs, fewer total words were produced in T19 than in T20. The sentences created by the students who continue their distance education in pandemic stay around less categories and contain more words. According to the within-subject findings obtained at T20 and T21, the cognitive flexibility and total words produced at T20 were greater. In other words, the scores of the students decreased over time during the pandemic period. In T21, cognitive flexibility is not related to vulnerability, perceived risk, and fear of COVID-19. However, according to the regression results, vulnerability at T21 was predicted by the total word and total emotional word in T20. Accordingly, producing more total words in T20 reduced vulnerability in T21; however, using more emotional words in T20 increased vulnerability in T21. In addition, the number of siblings was negatively associated with vulnerability. Lastly, cognitive flexibility test was found to be reliable.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 22
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [42] Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach
    Campitelli, Guillermo
    Gerrans, Paul
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (03) : 434 - 447
  • [43] Does the cognitive reflection test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach
    Guillermo Campitelli
    Paul Gerrans
    Memory & Cognition, 2014, 42 : 434 - 447
  • [44] Personal control and cognitive flexibility: Does uncontrollability reduce flexible shifting of attention?
    Bukowski, Marcin
    Spiewak, Slawomir
    Rozanska, Aleksandra
    Gruszka, Aleksandra
    LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 2024, 87
  • [45] Association of cognitive flexibility with neural activation during the theory of mind processing
    Sami, Hyotaro
    Tei, Shisei
    Takahashi, Hidehiko
    Fujino, Junya
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2023, 443
  • [46] Primed to be inflexible: the influence of set size on cognitive flexibility during childhood
    FitzGibbon, Lily
    Cragg, Lucy
    Carroll, Daniel J.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [49] The influence of offspring, parity, and oxytocin on cognitive flexibility during the postpartum period
    Albin-Brooks, Christopher
    Nealer, Connor
    Sabihi, Sara
    Haim, Achikam
    Leuner, Benedetta
    HORMONES AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 89 : 130 - 136
  • [50] The Impact of Proactive Personality and Cognitive Flexibility on Situational Judgment among Student Pilots in China
    Ji, Ming
    Jin, Fang
    Liu, Dan
    Yang, Can
    Chen, XingXing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 3D INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION, 2015, 11 : 64 - 67