Accuracy of the Bowen ratio-energy balance method for measuring latent heat flux in a semiarid advective environment

被引:66
|
作者
Gavilan, P. [1 ]
Berengena, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] IFAPA, Area Prod Ecol & Recursos Nat, Ctr Invest & Formac Agraria Alameda Obispo, Cordoba 14004, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00271-006-0040-1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Bowen Ratio-Energy Balance (BREB) is an accurate method often used to measure the latent heat flux (lambda E) due to its simplicity and portability. However, its performance in advective areas is less clear and its accuracy may depend on the equality of eddy transfer coefficients for heat and water vapor. In this work, hourly measured lambda E of a reference crop (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) using a BREB system was compared with lysimeter-measured lambda E under moderate to severe advective conditions. The lysimeter resolution for hourly records was 22.6 W m(-2). The analysis of the eddy transfer coefficients was made using simultaneous measurements of fluxes and vertical gradients of temperature and humidity. To avoid computational problems when beta -> -1, some hourly periods were discarded in the analysis. Rejected data amounted to 37% of the total, although the cumulative evapotranspiration (ET) during these hours did not exceed 13% of the total ET. The BREB method overestimated daily ET by an average of 5.5% and by 5.7% when only daylight hours were considered. Under stable atmospheric conditions the method was less accurate, with relative errors of 21% vs. 11% under unstable conditions. For daylight hours, accuracy was higher under unstable conditions (RMSE = 36.15 W m(-2)) than under stable conditions (RMSE = 50.20 W m(-2)), which had larger overestimations of ET (6.3 vs. 5.1%). The main source of error appears to come from insufficient fetch resulting in local advective conditions. Nevertheless, and from a purely practical perspective, under the advective conditions of these measurements the BREB technique provides accurate ET fluxes with limited errors.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 140
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An investigation of the balance method of measuring unsteady heat flux
    Yu. I. Azima
    Measurement Techniques, 2006, 49 : 1224 - 1232
  • [22] Determination of Evapotranspiration for Wheat by Using Bowen Ratio Energy Balance Method
    Koc, Deniz Levent
    Kanber, Riza
    KSU TARIM VE DOGA DERGISI-KSU JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND NATURE, 2020, 23 (02): : 544 - 553
  • [23] APPLICABILITY OF BOWEN RATIO ENERGY BALANCE METHOD IN FETCH LIMITED CONDITIONS
    Poznikova, G.
    Trnka, M.
    Fischer, M.
    Orsag, M.
    Zalud, Z.
    MENDELNET 2012, 2012, : 493 - 503
  • [24] A simple model for estimating the Bowen ratio from climatic factors for determining latent and sensible heat flux
    Perez, P. J.
    Castellvi, F.
    Martinez-Cob, A.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2008, 148 (01) : 25 - 37
  • [25] Field Evaluation of Polymer Capacitive Humidity Sensors for Bowen Ratio Energy Balance Flux Measurements
    Savage, Michael J.
    SENSORS, 2010, 10 (08) : 7748 - 7771
  • [26] Handily measuring sensible and latent heat exchanges at a bargain: A test of the variance-Bowen ratio approach
    Wang, Tianxin
    Verfaillie, Joseph
    Szutu, Daphne
    Baldocchi, Dennis
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 333
  • [27] A REVIEW OF THE BOWEN RATIO SURFACE ENERGY BALANCE METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND OTHER ENERGY FLUXES
    Irmak, S.
    Skaggs, K. E.
    Chatterjee, S.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2014, 57 (06) : 1657 - 1674
  • [28] Estimate of the latent heat flux by the energy balance in protected cultivation of sweet pepper
    da Cunha, AR
    Escobedo, JF
    Klosowski, ES
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2002, 37 (06) : 735 - 743
  • [29] Estimating evapotranspiration from a reed bed using the Bowen ratio energy balance method
    Peacock, CE
    Hess, TM
    HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2004, 18 (02) : 247 - 260
  • [30] Evaluation of the heat pulse ratio method for measuring soil water flux
    Ochsner, TE
    Horton, R
    Kluitenberg, GJ
    Wang, QJ
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2005, 69 (03) : 757 - 765