Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - a multi-institution study

被引:1
|
作者
Kashani, R.
Baiter, J.
Kessler, M.
Hub, M.
Dong, L.
Zhang, L.
Xing, L.
Xie, Y.
Hawkes, D.
Schnabel, J.
McClelland, J.
Joshi, S.
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Deutsch Krebsforschungszentrum, D-6900 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[5] UCL, London, England
[6] Univ Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
D O I
10.1118/1.2761334
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: The looming potential of deformable alignment tools to play an integral role in adaptive radiotherapy suggests a need for objective assessment of these complex algorithms. Current studies of accuracy require analytically generated deformations applied to sample image data, or use of contours or bifurcations, with inherent uncertainty as well as potential bias, as these visible features are likely to dominate the local deformation parameters. Method and Materials: A deformable phantom was embedded with 48 small radiopaque markers, placed in regions varying from high contrast to roughly uniform regional intensity, and small to large regional discontinuities in movement. CT volumes of this phantom were acquired in two different deformation states. After manual localization of marker coordinates, images were edited to remove the markers. The resulting image volumes were sent to 4 collaborating institutions, each of which has developed previously published deformable alignment tools routinely in use. Alignments were done, and applied to the list of reference coordinates. The transformed coordinates were compared to the actual marker locations. Results: 5 alignment techniques were tested from the 4 institutions. All algorithms performed generally well, as compared to previous publications. Average errors in predicted location ranged from 1.7–3.9 mm, depending on technique. No algorithm was uniformly accurate across all regions of the phantom, with maximum errors ranging from 5.5 – 15.4 mm. Larger errors were seen in regions near significant shape changes, as well as areas with uniform contrast but large local motion discontinuity. Conclusion: An objective test of deformable alignment is feasible. Reasonable accuracy was achieved, although variable errors in different regions suggest caution in globally accepting the results from deformable alignment. Valuable feedback from investigators is being applied to development of further generations of deformable phantoms for alignment experiments. Sponsored by NIH P01‐CA59827. © 2007, American Association of Physicists in Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2545 / 2545
页数:1
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dosimetric Study of the Deformable Image Registration based Lung Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Wang, Linjing
    Zhang, Shuxu
    Yuan, Kehong
    Zhou, Lu
    Wang, Ruihao
    2015 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (BMEI), 2015, : 402 - 406
  • [22] Hybrid CBCT Image Deformable Organ Registration for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy Dose Assessment: Quantitative Validation Study
    Qin, A.
    Liang, J.
    Yan, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S820 - S820
  • [23] Assessment of a multi-institution integration of cultural competency activities
    Butler, Lakesha
    Chen, Aleda M. H.
    Borja-Hart, Nancy
    Arif, Sally
    Armbruster, Anastasia L.
    Petry, Natasha
    Riley, Angela C.
    CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2020, 12 (05) : 517 - 523
  • [24] Evolutionary Machine Learning for Multi-Objective Class Solutions in Medical Deformable Image Registration
    Pirpinia, Kleopatra
    Bosman, Peter A. N.
    Sonke, Jan-Jakob
    van Herk, Marcel
    Alderliesten, Tanja
    ALGORITHMS, 2019, 12 (05):
  • [25] Detection of vessel bifurcations in CT scans for automatic objective assessment of deformable image registration accuracy
    Cazoulat, Guillaume
    Anderson, Brian M.
    McCulloch, Molly M.
    Rigaud, Bastien
    Koay, Eugene J.
    Brock, Kristy K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (10) : 5935 - 5946
  • [26] Review and recommendations on deformable image registration uncertainties for radiotherapy applications
    Nenoff, Lena
    Amstutz, Florian
    Murr, Martina
    Archibald-Heeren, Ben
    Fusella, Marco
    Hussein, Mohammad
    Lechner, Wolfgang
    Zhang, Ye
    Sharp, Greg
    Osorio, Eliana Vasquez
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (24):
  • [27] Intelligent Interactive Deformable Image Registration for Online Adaptive Radiotherapy
    Bai, T.
    Dohopolski, M.
    Lu, W.
    Lin, M. H.
    Nguyen, D.
    Jiang, S. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E457 - E458
  • [28] Accuracy of deformable organ registration in image guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Chi, Y
    Liang, J
    Yan, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02): : S139 - S139
  • [29] Validation of a deformable image registration for adaptive radiotherapy of lung cancer
    Abdoli, M.
    Van Kranen, S.
    Sonke, J. J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2015, 115 : S491 - S491
  • [30] A deformable registration algorithm for prostate image guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Rivest, R.
    Riauka, T.
    Murtha, A.
    Fallone, G.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S89 - S89