Diversified crop-livestock farms are risk-efficient in the face of price and production variability

被引:25
|
作者
Bell, L. W. [1 ]
Moore, A. D. [2 ]
Thomas, D. T. [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Agr & Food, POB 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] CSIRO Agr & Food, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2061, Australia
[3] CSIRO Agr & Food, Private Bag 5, Wembley, WA 6913, Australia
关键词
Whole farm; Systems modelling; APSIM; GRAZPLAN; Economics; AUSTRALIAN GRAZING ENTERPRISES; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS; PROFIT; DAIRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103050
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Context: Mixed crop-livestock farms are important production systems worldwide and dominate Australia's broadacre agricultural regions. While integration of crops and livestock can offer many benefits, these are often intertwined and are hard to quantify explicitly. Objective: This paper set out to examine specifically the financial risk and return implications from operating a farm portfolio involving segregated crop and livestock enterprises considering both production variability and commodity price variability. Methods: Crop and livestock production from representative systems were simulated over 40 years at six locations spanning Australia's crop-livestock zone using coupled biophysical production simulation models, APSIM for cropping enterprises and GRAZPLAN for livestock enterprises. Time series of varying prices and costs for the same period were derived using historical data. Annual gross margins for each enterprise and different proportional land allocations to the farm were calculated either allowing both production and price to vary or keeping either constant at average values. Results and conclusions: At all locations the livestock enterprise had less downside risk than the cropping enterprises (as measured by conditional value at risk). Across both enterprises, the impact of production variability was greater than price variability at 5 of the 6 locations. Annual gross margins from the modelled crop and livestock enterprises were not well correlated with each other. Hence, even in the absence of biophysical interactions, the risk-efficient frontier included mixtures of crops and livestock enterprises at most sites. At two sites, a mix of 20-40% crop resulted in the lowest downside risk, while at other sites there was a clear trade-off between maximising farm returns and minimising risk across a range of crop-livestock mixtures. Significance: This is the first study to explicitly quantify and show across a diversity of environments in Australia's mixed farming systems that operating a mixture of even segregated crop and livestock enterprises in a farming business can help farmers optimise their risk-return trade-off. Similar risk mitigation benefits may be achieved through crop-livestock systems in other agricultural regions exposed to high climate and price variability.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Maize crop residue uses and trade-offs on smallholder crop-livestock farms in Zimbabwe: Economic implications of intensification
    Rusinamhodzi, Leonard
    van Wijk, Mark T.
    Corbeels, Marc
    Rufino, Mariana C.
    Giller, Ken E.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 214 : 31 - 45
  • [32] Does mixed crop-livestock farming lead to less diversified diets among smallholders? Evidence from Laos
    Parvathi, Priyanka
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 49 (04) : 497 - 509
  • [33] Integrated crop-livestock system in tropical Brazil: Toward a sustainable production system
    Salton, Julio C.
    Mercante, Fabio M.
    Tomazi, Michely
    Zanatta, Josileia A.
    Concenco, Germani
    Silva, Wiliam M.
    Retore, Marciana
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 190 : 70 - 79
  • [34] Crop-livestock production system for fattening lambs under desert farming.
    Eweedah, N.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 56 - 56
  • [35] The role of manure in the management of phosphorus resources at an Italian crop-livestock production farm
    Zaccheo, P
    Genevini, P
    Ambrosini, D
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1997, 66 (03) : 231 - 239
  • [36] Potential of Lablab purpureus accessions for crop-livestock production in the West African savanna
    Ewansiha, S. U.
    Chiezey, U. F.
    Tarawali, S. A.
    Iwuafor, E. N. O.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2007, 145 : 229 - 238
  • [37] ANIMAL PRODUCTION, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND DIGESTIBILITY OF TROPICAL FORAGES IN CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEM
    Krutzmann, Alexandre
    Cecato, Ulysses
    dos Santos, Geraldo Tadeu
    Lino, Daniela Andressa
    Horst, Jose Augusto
    Ribeiro, Ossival Lolato
    BIOSCIENCE JOURNAL, 2014, 30 (02): : 491 - 501
  • [38] Production and quality of corn silage with forage and pigeon peas in a crop-livestock system
    Gomes, Vinicius Carreteiro
    de Lima Meirelles, Paulo Roberto
    Costa, Ciniro
    Barrosl, Juliana da Silva
    de Castilhos, Andre Michel
    de Souzal, Daniel Martins
    Tardivol, Renata
    Pariz, Cristiano Magalhaes
    SEMINA-CIENCIAS AGRARIAS, 2021, 42 (02): : 861 - 875
  • [39] Crop and cattle production responses to tillage and cover crop management in an integrated crop-livestock system in the southeastern USA
    Franzluebbers, Alan J.
    Stuedernann, John A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2014, 57 : 62 - 70
  • [40] Agricultural resource and risk management with multiperiod stochastics: A case of the mixed crop-livestock production system in the drylands of Jordan
    Boussios, David
    Preckel, Paul V.
    Yigezu, Yigezu A.
    Dixit, Prakash
    Rekik, Mourad
    Hilali, Muhi El Dine
    Wamatu, Jane
    Haile, Aynalem
    Shakhatreh, Yahya
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10