Pressure and Argumentation in Public Controversies: A Dialogical Perspective

被引：1
|
作者：
van Laar, Jan Albert [1 ]
Krabbe, Erik C. W. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Groningen, Fac Philosophy, Oude Boteringestr 52, NL-9712 GL Groningen, Netherlands
来源：
INFORMAL LOGIC | 2019年 / 39卷 / 03期
关键词：
argumentation; fallacies; negotiation dialogue; persuasion dialogue; pressure; public controversy; NEGOTIATION;
D O I：
10.22329/il.v39i3.5739
中图分类号：
B81 [逻辑学（论理学）];
学科分类号：
010104 ; 010105 ;
摘要：
When can exerting pressure in a public controversy promote reasonable outcomes, and when is it rather a hindrance? We show how negotiation and persuasion dialogue can be intertwined. Then, we examine in what ways one can in a public controversy exert pressure on others through sanctions or rewards. Finally, we discuss from the viewpoints of persuasion and negotiation whether and, if so, how pressure hinders the achievement of a reasonable outcome.
引用
收藏
页码：205 / 227
页数：23
相关论文
共 50 条
12345