Providers' perceptions of spinal cord injury pressure ulcer guidelines

被引:16
|
作者
Thomason, Susan S. [1 ]
Evitt, Celinda P. [1 ]
Harrow, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Love, Linda [1 ]
Moore, D. Helen [1 ]
Mullins, Maria A. [1 ]
Powell-Cope, Gail [1 ]
Nelson, Audrey L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Med, Dept Vet Affairs, Tampa, FL USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE | 2007年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
decubitus ulcer; skin ulcer; pressure ulcer; practice guidelines; evidence-based medicine; prevention; spinal cord injuries;
D O I
10.1080/10790268.2007.11753922
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Objective: Pressure ulcers are a serious complication for people with spinal cord injury (SCI). The Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine (CSCM) published clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) that provided guidance for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment after SCI. The aim of this study was to assess providers' perceptions for each of the 32 CPG recommendations regarding their agreement with CPGs, degree of CPG implementation, and CPG implementation barriers and facilitators. Methods: This descriptive mixed-methods study included both qualitative (focus groups) and quantitative (survey) data collection approaches. The sample (n = 60) included 24 physicians and 36 nurses who attended the 2004 annual national conferences of the American Paraplegia Society or American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Nurses. This sample drew from two sources: a purposive sample from a list of preregistered participants and a convenience sample of conference attendee volunteers. We analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using a coding scheme to capture barriers and facilitators. Results: The focus groups agreed unanimously on the substance of 6 of the 32 recommendations. Nurse and physician focus groups disagreed on the degree of CGP implementation at their sites, with nurses as a group perceiving less progress in implementation of the guideline recommendations. The focus groups identified only one recommendation, complications of surgery, as being fully implemented at their sites. Categories of barriers and facilitators for implementation of CPGs that emerged from the qualitative analysis included (a) characteristics of CPGs: need for research/evidence, (b) characteristics of CPGs: complexity of design and wording, (c) organizational factors, (d) lack of knowledge, and (e) lack of resources. Conclusions: Although generally SCI physicians and nurses agreed with the CPG recommendations as written, they did not feel these recommendations were fully implemented in their respective clinical settings. The focus groups identified multiple barriers to the implementation of the CPGs and suggested several facilitators/solutions to improve implementation of these guidelines in SCI. Participants identified organizational factors and the lack of knowledge as the most substantial systems/issues that created barriers to CPG implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 126
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An animal model for simulating deep tissue injury for pressure ulcer research on spinal cord injury
    Makhsous, Mohsen
    Lin, Fang
    Cichowski, Andrew
    Pandya, Atek
    Modi, Mauli
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2010, 24
  • [22] Lifestyle Changes and Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury in the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Study Lifestyle Intervention
    Ghaisas, Samruddhi
    Pyatak, Elizabeth A.
    Blanche, Erna
    Blanchard, Jeanine
    Clark, Florence
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2015, 69 (01): : 97 - 106
  • [23] Spinal cord injury providers' perceptions of barriers to implementing selected clinical practice guideline recommendations
    Guihan, M
    Simmons, B
    Nelson, A
    Bosshart, HT
    Burns, SP
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2003, 26 (01): : 48 - 58
  • [24] Predictive validity of the Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Ulcer Scale (SCIPUS) in acute care and inpatient rehabilitation in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury
    Krishnan, Shilpa
    Brick, Rachelle S.
    Karg, Patricia E.
    Tzen, Yi-Ting
    Garber, Susan L.
    Sowa, Gwendolyn A.
    Brienza, David M.
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2016, 38 (04) : 401 - 409
  • [25] Validation of home telehealth for pressure ulcer assessment: a study in patients with spinal cord injury
    Hill, Michelle L.
    Cronkite, Ruth C.
    Ota, Doug T.
    Yao, Elisa C.
    Kiratli, B. Jenny
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2009, 15 (04) : 196 - 202
  • [26] The average cost of pressure ulcer management in a community dwelling spinal cord injury population
    Chan, Brian C.
    Nanwa, Natasha
    Mittmann, Nicole
    Bryant, Dianne
    Coyte, Peter C.
    Houghton, Pamela E.
    INTERNATIONAL WOUND JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (04) : 431 - 440
  • [27] PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PRESSURE ULCER RISK IN SPINAL-CORD INJURY PATIENTS
    RODRIGUEZ, GP
    GARBER, SL
    PARAPLEGIA, 1994, 32 (03): : 150 - 158
  • [28] Difficulty in Identifying Factors Responsible for Pressure Ulcer Healing in Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury
    Guihan, Marylou
    Sohn, Min-Woong
    Bauman, William A.
    Spungen, Ann M.
    Powell-Cope, Gail M.
    Thomason, Susan S.
    Collins, Joseph F.
    Bates-Jensen, Barbara M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2016, 97 (12): : 2085 - 2094
  • [29] Pressure ulcer knowledge, beliefs and practices in a group of South Africans with spinal cord injury
    Visser, Adri Marica
    Visagie, Surona
    SPINAL CORD SERIES AND CASES, 2019, 5 (01)
  • [30] Pressure ulcer knowledge, beliefs and practices in a group of South Africans with spinal cord injury
    Adri Marica Visser
    Surona Visagie
    Spinal Cord Series and Cases, 5