Quantitative T2*-Weighted Imaging and Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Rectal Cancer: Correlation of R2*and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histopathological Prognostic Factors

被引:12
|
作者
Peng, Yang [1 ]
Luo, Yan [1 ]
Hu, Xuemei [1 ]
Shen, Yaqi [1 ]
Hu, Daoyu [1 ]
Li, Zhen [2 ]
Kamel, Ihab [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Dept Radiol, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rectal neoplasms; diffusion weighted imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; prognosis; biomerkers; EXTRAMURAL DEPTH; TUMOR INVASION; MRI; AGGRESSIVENESS; ASSOCIATION; OXYGENATION; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; HYPOXIA;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.670156
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI) and reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted Imaging (rDWI) derived parameters and their relationships with histopathological factors in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: Fifty-four patients with pathologically-proven rectal cancer underwent preoperative T2*-weighted imaging and rDWI in this retrospective study. R2* values from T2*-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from rDWI were compared in terms of different histopathological prognostic factors using student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The correlations of R2* and ADC with prognostic factors were assessed by Spearman correlation analysis. The diagnostic performances of R2* and ADC were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) separately and jointly. Results: Significant positive correlation was found between R2*( )values and T stage, lymph node involvement, histological grades, CEA level, the presence of EMVI and tumor deposit (r = 0.374 similar to 0.673, p = 0.000-0.006), with the exception of CA19-9 level, CRM status and tumor involvement in the circumference lumen (TIL). Meanwhile, ADC values negatively correlated with almost all the prognostic factors (r = -0.588 to -0.299, p = 0.000-0.030), except CA19-9 level. The AUC range was 0.724-0.907 for R2* and 0.6740.887 for ADC in discrimination of different prognostic factors. While showing the highest AUC of 0.913 (0.803-1.000) in differentiation of T stage, combination of R2* and ADC with reference to different prognostic factors did not significantly improve the diagnostic performance in comparison with individual R2*/ADC parameter. Conclusions: R2* and ADC were associated with important histopathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer. R2* might act as additional quantitative imaging marker for tumor characterization of rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reduced field-of-view versus full field-of-view diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Jang, Siwon
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    Bae, Jae Seok
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (04) : 1468 - 1477
  • [32] Association between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values on Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer
    Ng, W. K.
    Wong, C. K. K.
    Fung, E. P. Y.
    Wong, C. W.
    Mak, W. S.
    Kwok, K. M.
    Lam, H. S.
    Cho, H. Y.
    HONG KONG JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 22 (02): : 98 - 106
  • [33] Repeatability Investigation of Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Thyroid Glands
    Lu, Yonggang
    Hatzoglou, Vaios
    Banerjee, Suchandrima
    Stambuk, Hilda E.
    Gonen, Mithat
    Shankaranarayanan, Ajit
    Mazaheri, Yousef
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Shaha, Ashok R.
    Tuttle, R. Michael
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2015, 39 (03) : 334 - 339
  • [34] Modified Reduced Field-of-View Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Comparison With Reduced Field-of-View Imaging and Single Shot Echo-Planar Imaging
    Lee, Eun Ji
    Hwang, Jiyoung
    Chang, Yun-Woo
    Hong, Seong Sook
    Oh, Eunsun
    Nam, Bo Da
    Sung, Jae Kon
    Thomas, Benkert
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [35] Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient value on diffusion-weighted MR imaging and Gleason score in prostate cancer
    Wu, X.
    Reinikainen, P.
    Vanhanen, A.
    Kapanen, M.
    Vierikko, T.
    Ryymin, P.
    Hyodynmaa, S.
    Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P. -L.
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2017, 98 (01) : 63 - 71
  • [36] Pathological prognostic factors of rectal cancer based on diffusion-weighted imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion, and diffusion kurtosis imaging
    Zhou, Mi
    Chen, Mengyuan
    Luo, Mingfang
    Chen, Meining
    Huang, Hongyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (02) : 979 - 988
  • [37] High-resolution reduced field-of-view diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cervical cancer
    Mao, Lijuan
    Zhang, Xiaoling
    Chen, Tingting
    Li, Zhoulei
    Yang, Jianyong
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 13 (06) : 3464 - 3476
  • [38] Simultaneous measurement of T2 and apparent diffusion coefficient (T2+ADC) in the heart with motion-compensated spin echo diffusion-weighted imaging
    Aliotta, Eric
    Moulin, Kevin
    Zhang, Zhaohuan
    Ennis, Daniel B.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2018, 79 (02) : 654 - 662
  • [39] T staging of rectal cancer: Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging compared with T2-weighted imaging on 3.0 tesla MRI
    Feng, Qi
    Yan, Yun Qi
    Zhu, Jiong
    Xu, Jian Rong
    JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2014, 15 (04) : 188 - 194
  • [40] Use of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Gastric Cancer Staging
    Soydan, Levent
    Demir, Ali Aslan
    Torun, Mehmet
    Cikrikcioglu, Makbule Arar
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (10) : 1278 - 1289