Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience

被引:423
|
作者
Dunn, MD
Portis, AJ
Shalhav, AL
Elbahnasy, AM
Heidorn, C
McDougall, EM
Clayman, RV
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Surg,Div Urol Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Urol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Tanta Univ, Dept Urol, Tanta, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2000年 / 164卷 / 04期
关键词
laparoscopy; neoplasms; kidney; nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The laparoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is slowly evolving. We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open radical nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: From 1990 to 1999, 32 males and 28 females underwent 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspicious renal cell carcinoma. Clinical data from a computerized database were reviewed and compared to a contemporary group of 33 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Results: Patients in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group had significantly reduced, estimated blood loss (172 versus 451 ml., p <0.001), hospital stay (3.4 versus 5.2 days, p <0.001), pain medication requirement (28.0 versus 78.3 mg., p <0.001) and quicker return to normal activity than patients in the open radical nephrectomy group (3.6 versus 8.1 weeks, p <0.001), The majority of laparoscopic specimens (65%) were morcellated. Operating time and cost were higher in the laparoscopic than the open nephrectomy group. Average followup was 25 months (range 3 to 73) for the laparoscopic and 27.5 months (range 7 to 90) for the open group. Renal cell carcinoma in 3 patients (8%) recurred in the laparoscopic group versus renal cell, carcinoma in 3 (9%) in the open group. When stratified patients with tumors larger than 4 to 10 cm. experienced similar benefits and results as patients with tumors less than or equal to 4 cm. To date there have been no instances of trocar or intraperitoneal seeding in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, although technically demanding, is a viable alternative for managing localized renal tumors up to 10 cm. It affords patients with renal tumors an improved postoperative course with less pain and a quicker recovery while providing similar efficacy at 2-year followup for patients with T1 and T2 tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: A multicenter experience
    Argun, Burak
    Yalcin, Veli
    Apaydin, Erdal
    Bayazit, Yildrim
    Oktay, Bulent
    Bilen, Cenk Yucel
    Demirkesen, Oktay
    Turna, Burak
    Akpinar, Haluk
    Yavascaoglu, Ismet
    Kural, Ali Riza
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A188 - A188
  • [22] A health economic analysis of laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy in the management of solid renal tumours - the UK experience
    Kommu, Sashi S.
    Patel, Suril P.
    Wright, Mark P.
    Mumtaz, Faiz H.
    Persad, Raj A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A204 - A204
  • [23] Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy
    Morrissey, PE
    Madras, PN
    Gohh, RY
    Monaco, AP
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (06) : 2596 - 2596
  • [24] Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy
    K.T. Pace
    S.J. Dyer
    V. Phan
    R.J. Stewart
    R.J.D.A. Honey
    E.C. Poulin
    C.M. Schlachta
    J. Mamazza
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, 17 : 134 - 142
  • [25] Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy
    Beasley, KA
    Al Omar, M
    Shaikh, A
    Bochinski, D
    Khakhar, A
    Izawa, JI
    Welch, RO
    Chin, JL
    Kapoor, A
    Luke, PPW
    UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (03) : 458 - 461
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy
    Idu, Mirza M.
    Balm, Ron
    Bemelman, Willem A.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 82 (09) : 1243 - 1243
  • [27] Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy - Editorial comment
    Moon, TD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 1762 - 1762
  • [28] Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis: Contemporary outcomes analysis
    Vanderbrink, Brian A.
    Ost, Michael C.
    Rastinehad, Ardeshir
    Anderson, Ann
    Badlani, Gopal H.
    Smith, Arthur D.
    Levine, Michael A.
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (01) : 65 - 70
  • [29] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy
    Nakada, SY
    Fadden, P
    Jarrard, DF
    Moon, TD
    UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (04) : 517 - 520
  • [30] Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison to open radical nephrectomy
    Yip, SK
    Tan, YH
    Cheng, WS
    UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (04) : 632 - 632