Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: A 9-year experience

被引:423
|
作者
Dunn, MD
Portis, AJ
Shalhav, AL
Elbahnasy, AM
Heidorn, C
McDougall, EM
Clayman, RV
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Surg,Div Urol Surg, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Urol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Mallinckrodt Inst Radiol, Dept Radiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Tanta Univ, Dept Urol, Tanta, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2000年 / 164卷 / 04期
关键词
laparoscopy; neoplasms; kidney; nephrectomy;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67131-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The laparoscopic approach for renal cell carcinoma is slowly evolving. We report our experience with laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and compare it to a contemporary cohort of patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent open radical nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: From 1990 to 1999, 32 males and 28 females underwent 61 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies for suspicious renal cell carcinoma. Clinical data from a computerized database were reviewed and compared to a contemporary group of 33 patients who underwent open radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Results: Patients in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group had significantly reduced, estimated blood loss (172 versus 451 ml., p <0.001), hospital stay (3.4 versus 5.2 days, p <0.001), pain medication requirement (28.0 versus 78.3 mg., p <0.001) and quicker return to normal activity than patients in the open radical nephrectomy group (3.6 versus 8.1 weeks, p <0.001), The majority of laparoscopic specimens (65%) were morcellated. Operating time and cost were higher in the laparoscopic than the open nephrectomy group. Average followup was 25 months (range 3 to 73) for the laparoscopic and 27.5 months (range 7 to 90) for the open group. Renal cell carcinoma in 3 patients (8%) recurred in the laparoscopic group versus renal cell, carcinoma in 3 (9%) in the open group. When stratified patients with tumors larger than 4 to 10 cm. experienced similar benefits and results as patients with tumors less than or equal to 4 cm. To date there have been no instances of trocar or intraperitoneal seeding in the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy group. Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, although technically demanding, is a viable alternative for managing localized renal tumors up to 10 cm. It affords patients with renal tumors an improved postoperative course with less pain and a quicker recovery while providing similar efficacy at 2-year followup for patients with T1 and T2 tumors.
引用
收藏
页码:1153 / 1159
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy versus open radical nephrectomy: A outcome analysis
    Vyas, Jigish
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Sharma, Rajan
    Muthu, V.
    Manohar, T.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A188 - A188
  • [2] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy
    Abbou, CC
    Cicco, A
    Gasman, D
    Hoznek, A
    Antiphon, P
    Chopin, DK
    Salomon, L
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (06): : 1776 - 1780
  • [3] Laparoscopic renal biopsy: a 9-year experience
    Shetye, KR
    Kavoussi, LR
    Ramakumar, S
    Fugita, OE
    Jarrett, TW
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (09) : 817 - 820
  • [4] PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (LRN) VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY (ORN)
    Sanli, O.
    Tefik, T.
    Ortac, M.
    Karakus, S.
    Kucukdurmaz, F.
    Esen, T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A107 - A107
  • [5] Financial analysis of open versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and nephroureterectomy
    Meraney, AM
    Gill, IS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 1757 - 1762
  • [6] Radical nephrectomy by retroperitoneal laparoscopic approach versus open surgery
    Cicco, A
    Joual, A
    Hoznek, A
    Gasman, D
    Salomon, L
    Antiphon, P
    Chopin, DK
    Abbou, CC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (05): : 154 - 154
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: The University of Chicago experience
    Gong, E. M.
    Orvieto, M. A.
    Lucioni, A.
    Msezane, L.
    Steinberg, G. D.
    Shalhav, A. L.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A173 - A173
  • [8] Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Single surgeon experience
    Knoll, A.
    Lowe, D.
    Koi, P.
    Milhoua, P.
    Ghavamian, R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A171 - A171
  • [9] Complications and Failure to Rescue After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Nephrectomy
    Tan, Hung-Jui
    Wolf, J. Stuart, Jr.
    Ye, Zaojun
    Wei, John T.
    Miller, David C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (04): : 1254 - 1260
  • [10] COST ANALYSIS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY
    Bayrak, Omer
    Seckiner, Ilker
    Erturhan, Sakip Mehmet
    Cil, Gokhan
    Erbagci, Ahmet
    Yagci, Faruk
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A282 - A282