Biological survey and setting priorities for flora conservation in Western Australia

被引:6
|
作者
Keighery, Greg J. [1 ]
Gibson, Neil [1 ]
van Leeuwen, Stephen [1 ]
Lyons, Michael N. [1 ]
Patrick, Sue [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Australia Dept Environm & Conservat, Div Sci, Wanneroo, WA 6946, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1071/BT06102
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Biological survey has been an integral component of conservation planning in Western Australia for > 30 years, providing baseline data for reserve selection and the management of biodiversity at the genetic, species and community levels. Flora surveys are particularly important, given the diverse and poorly documented nature of the state's vascular flora. Surveys have been conducted at the following four scales: regional, subregional, local and individual species. At all scales, flora surveys have provided detail on individual taxon distribution, have identified previously unknown or unrecognised taxa, have located presumed extinct taxa and have substantially contributed to information on the distribution of threatened flora. Regional-scale surveys normally involve multidisciplinary teams studying a broad selection of the biota. These combined plot-based data are used to develop a 'classify-then-model' approach to assessment of comprehensiveness, adequacy and representativeness of the regional conservation reserve system. These regional models describe the broad-scale patterning of common taxa but their utility in reflecting patterns in naturally rare or highly restricted taxa is uncertain. Results from recent surveys show poor correlations between floristic patterning and other components of the biota.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 315
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Wilderness and future conservation priorities in Australia
    Watson, James E. M.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Watson, Alexander W. T.
    Mackey, Brendan G.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Turner, Matthew
    Klein, Carissa J.
    Carwardine, Josie
    Joseph, Liana N.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2009, 15 (06) : 1028 - 1036
  • [12] Constructing Red Numbers for setting conservation priorities of endangered plant species: Israeli flora as a test case
    Sapir, Yuval
    Shmida, Avi
    Fragman, Ori
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2003, 11 (02) : 91 - 107
  • [13] Predicting and setting conservation priorities for Bolivian mammals based on biological correlates of the risk of decline
    Penaranda, Diego A.
    Simonetti, Javier A.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 834 - 843
  • [14] Taxonomic research priorities for the conservation of the South African flora
    von Staden, Lize
    Raimondo, Domitilla
    Dayaram, Anisha
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2013, 109 (3-4) : 48 - 57
  • [15] Conservation priorities for the threatened flora of mountaintop grasslands in Brazil
    Monteiro, Lara
    Machado, Nathalia
    Martins, Eline
    Pougy, Nina
    Verdi, Marcio
    Martinelli, Gustavo
    Loyola, Rafael
    FLORA, 2018, 238 : 234 - 243
  • [16] SETTING PRIORITIES FOR REGIONAL PLANT CONSERVATION PROGRAMS
    HOLSINGER, KE
    RHODORA, 1992, 94 (879) : 243 - 257
  • [17] Setting priorities for the conservation of terrestrial vertebrates in Hungary
    Báldi, A
    Csorba, G
    Korsós, Z
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2001, 10 (08) : 1283 - 1296
  • [18] Probabilistic classification rules for setting conservation priorities
    Burgman, MA
    Keith, DA
    Rohlf, FJ
    Todd, CR
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1999, 89 (02) : 227 - 231
  • [19] Setting priorities for the conservation of terrestrial vertebrates in Hungary
    András Báldi
    Gábor Csorba
    Zoltán Korsós
    Biodiversity & Conservation, 2001, 10 : 1283 - 1296
  • [20] SETTING PRIORITIES FOR THE CONSERVATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE SPECIES IN FLORIDA
    MILLSAP, BA
    GORE, JA
    RUNDE, DE
    CERULEAN, SI
    WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, 1990, (111) : 1 - 57