High susceptibility prevalence for F4+ and F18+ Escherichia coli in Flemish pigs

被引:14
|
作者
Nguyen, Ut V. [1 ]
Coddens, Annelies [1 ]
Melkebeek, Vesna [1 ]
Devriendt, Bert [1 ]
Goetstouwers, Tiphanie [2 ]
Van Poucke, Mario [2 ]
Peelman, Luc [2 ]
Cox, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Lab Immunol, Fac Vet Med, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Lab Anim Genet, Fac Vet Med, Heidestr 19, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
关键词
F4; ETEC; F18(+) E. coli; Post-weaning diarrhea; Pigs; JEJUNAL BRUSH-BORDERS; NUCLEOTIDE-SEQUENCE; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; K88; ANTIGEN; ADHESION; F4; INHERITANCE; FIMBRIAE; RECEPTOR; PHENOTYPES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.014
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
F4 and/or F18 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (Fe+/F18(+) ETEC) are responsible for diarrhea while F18(+) verotoxigenic E. coli (F18(+) VTEC) cause edema disease in pigs. Both infections can result in severe economic losses, which are mainly the result of the medication, growth retardation and mortality. The susceptibility of piglets to these pathogens is determined by the presence of F4 and F18 receptors (F4R and FI8R). Understanding the composition of the susceptibility phenotypes of pigs is useful for animal health and breeding management. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the F4 ETEC susceptibility phenotypes and F18(+) E. coli susceptibility among Flemish pig breeds by using the in vitro villous adhesion assay. In this study, seven F4 ETEC susceptibility phenotypes were found, namely A (F4(ab)R(+),R-ac(+),R-ad(+); 59.16%), B (F4(ab)R(+),R-ac(+),R-ad(-); 6.28%), C (F4(ab)R(+),R-ac(-),R-ad(+); 2.62%), D (F4(ab)R(-),R-ac(-),R-ad(+); 6.28%), E (F4(ab)R(-),R-ac(-),R-ad(-); 24.08%), F (F4(ab)R(+),R-ac(-),R-ad(-); 1.05%) and G (F4(ab)R(-),R-ac(+),R-ad(-); 0.52%). F4ab and F4(ac) E. coli showed a stronger degree of adhesion to the intestinal villi (53.40% and 52.88% strong adhesion, respectively), compared to F4ad E. coli (43.46% strong adhesion). Furthermore, the correlation between F4ac and F4ab adhesion was higher (r = 0.78) than between F4ac and F4ad adhesion (r = 0.41) and between F4ab and F4ad adhesion (r = 0.57). For F18(+) E. coli susceptibility, seven out of 82 pigs were FI8R negative (8.54%), but only two of these seven pigs (2.44%) were also negative for F4R. As such, the chance to identify a pig that is positive for a F4 ETEC variant or F18(+) E. coli is 97.56%. Therefore, significant economic losses will arise due to F4(+) and/or F18(+) E. coli infections in the Flemish pig population due to the high susceptibility prevalence. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methodology and application of Escherichia coli F4 and F18 encoding infection models in post-weaning pigs
    Diana Luise
    Charlotte Lauridsen
    Paolo Bosi
    Paolo Trevisi
    Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2019, 10 (03) : 559 - 578
  • [32] Dietary spray dried (immune) plasma protects against experimental F4+ Escherichia coli post-weaning diarrhea in pigs.
    Niewold, T.
    Van Dijk, A.
    Geenen, P.
    Roodink, H.
    Margry, R.
    van der Meulen, J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 : 118 - 118
  • [33] Maillard neoglycans as inhibitors for in vitro adhesion of F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to piglet intestinal cells
    Manuel Sarabia-Sainz, Hector
    Mata Haro, Veronica
    Sarabia Sainz, Jose Andre-i
    Vazquez-Moreno, Luz
    Ramos-Clamont Montfort, Gabriela
    ACTA BIOCHIMICA POLONICA, 2017, 64 (04) : 679 - 686
  • [34] Different kinetic of antibody responses following infection of newly weaned pigs with an F4 enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain or an F18 verotoxigenic Escherichia coli strain
    Verdonck, F
    Cox, E
    van Gog, K
    Van der Stede, Y
    Duchateau, L
    Deprez, P
    Goddeeris, BM
    VACCINE, 2002, 20 (23-24) : 2995 - 3004
  • [35] F18 fimbriae detection in Escherichia coli strains isolated from pigs
    Osek, J
    MEDYCYNA WETERYNARYJNA-VETERINARY MEDICINE-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1998, 54 (07): : 470 - 473
  • [36] Comparison of genotypes of Escherichia coli strains carrying F18ab and F18ac fimbriae from pigs
    DebRoy, Chitrita
    Roberts, Elisabeth
    Scheuchenzuber, William
    Kariyawasam, Subhashinie
    Jayarao, Bhushan M.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2009, 21 (03) : 359 - 364
  • [37] Orally active bivalent VHH construct prevents proliferation of F4+ enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in weaned piglets
    Fiil, Berthe Katrine
    Thrane, Sandra Wingaard
    Pichler, Michael
    Kittila, Tiia
    Ledsgaard, Line
    Ahmadi, Shirin
    Hermansen, Grith Miriam Maigaard
    Jelsbak, Lars
    Lauridsen, Charlotte
    Brix, Susanne
    Laustsen, Andreas Hougaard
    ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (04)
  • [38] The search for the gene mutations underlying enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ab/ac susceptibility in pigs: a review
    Martine Schroyen
    Anneleen Stinckens
    Roderick Verhelst
    Theo Niewold
    Nadine Buys
    Veterinary Research, 43
  • [39] The search for the gene mutations underlying enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli F4ab/ac susceptibility in pigs: a review
    Schroyen, Martine
    Stinckens, Anneleen
    Verhelst, Roderick
    Niewold, Theo
    Buys, Nadine
    VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2012, 43
  • [40] Significance of Mucosa-Associated Microbiota and Its Impacts on Intestinal Health of Pigs Challenged with F18+ E. coli
    Duarte, Marcos Elias
    Kim, Sung Woo
    PATHOGENS, 2022, 11 (05):