Test-Retest Variability in the Characteristics of Envelope Following Responses Evoked by Speech Stimuli

被引:18
|
作者
Easwar, Vijayalakshmi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Scollie, Susan [3 ,4 ]
Aiken, Steven [5 ]
Purcell, David [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Madison, WI USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Waisman Ctr, Madison, WI USA
[3] Western Univ, Natl Ctr Audiol, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, London, ON, Canada
[5] Dalhousie Univ, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, Halifax, NS, Canada
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2020年 / 41卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Amplitude; Auditory steady-state response; Coefficient of variation; Detection; Fourier analyzer; Fricatives; Phase coherence; Repeatability coefficient; Vowels; FREQUENCY-FOLLOWING RESPONSE; STEADY-STATE RESPONSES; HEARING-AID GAIN; SPECTRAL DISTRIBUTION; RELIABILITY; ADULTS; COMPRESSION; POTENTIALS; BANDWIDTH; INPUT;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000739
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the between-session test-retest variability in the characteristics of envelope following responses (EFRs) evoked by modified natural speech stimuli in young normal hearing adults. Design: EFRs from 22 adults were recorded in two sessions, 1 to 12 days apart. EFRs were evoked by the token /susa integral i/ (2.05sec) presented at 65 dB SPL and recorded from the vertex referenced to the neck. The token /susa integral i/, spoken by a male with an average fundamental frequency [f(0)] of 98.53 Hz, was of interest because of its potential utility as an objective hearing aid outcome measure. Each vowel was modified to elicit two EFRs simultaneously by lowering the f(0) in the first formant while maintaining the original f(0) in the higher formants. Fricatives were amplitude-modulated at 93.02 Hz and elicited one EFR each. EFRs evoked by vowels and fricatives were estimated using Fourier analyzer and discrete Fourier transform, respectively. Detection of EFRs was determined by an F-test. Test-retest variability in EFR amplitude and phase coherence were quantified using correlation, repeated-measures analysis of variance, and the repeatability coefficient. The repeatability coefficient, computed as twice the standard deviation (SD) of test-retest differences, represents the 95% limits of test-retest variation around the mean difference. Test-retest variability of EFR amplitude and phase coherence were compared using the coefficient of variation, a normalized metric, which represents the ratio of the SD of repeat measurements to its mean. Consistency in EFR detection outcomes was assessed using the test of proportions. Results: EFR amplitude and phase coherence did not vary significantly between sessions, and were significantly correlated across repeat measurements. The repeatability coefficient for EFR amplitude ranged from 38.5 nV to 45.6 nV for all stimuli, except for /integral/ (71.6 nV). For any given stimulus, the test-retest differences in EFR amplitude of individual participants were not correlated with their test-retest differences in noise amplitude. However, across stimuli, higher repeatability coefficients of EFR amplitude tended to occur when the group mean noise amplitude and the repeatability coefficient of noise amplitude were higher. The test-retest variability of phase coherence was comparable to that of EFR amplitude in terms of the coefficient of variation, and the repeatability coefficient varied from 0.1 to 0.2, with the highest value of 0.2 for /integral/. Mismatches in EFR detection outcomes occurred in 11 of 176 measurements. For each stimulus, the tests of proportions revealed a significantly higher proportion of matched detection outcomes compared to mismatches. Conclusions: Speech-evoked EFRs demonstrated reasonable repeatability across sessions. Of the eight stimuli, the shortest stimulus /integral/ demonstrated the largest variability in EFR amplitude and phase coherence. The test-retest variability in EFR amplitude could not be explained by test-retest differences in noise amplitude for any of the stimuli. This lack of explanation argues for other sources of variability, one possibility being the modulation of cortical contributions imposed on brainstem-generated EFRs.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 164
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The test-retest reliability of the respiratory-related evoked potential
    Herzog, Michaela
    Sucec, Josef
    Jelincic, Valentina
    Van Diest, Ilse
    Van den Bergh, Omer
    Chan, Pei-Ying S.
    Davenport, Paul
    von Leupoldt, Andreas
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 163
  • [43] Test-retest reliability of respiratory-related evoked potentials
    Sucec, Josef
    Herzog, Michaela
    Davenport, Paul W.
    Chan, Pei-Ying S.
    Van Diest, Ilse
    Van den Bergh, Omer
    von Leupoldt, Andreas
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 383 - 383
  • [44] Learning Effect and Test-Retest Variability of Pulsar Perimetry
    Salvetat, Maria Letizia
    Zeppieri, Marco
    Parisi, Lucia
    Johnson, Chris A.
    Sampaolesi, Roberto
    Brusini, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2013, 22 (03) : 230 - 237
  • [45] Chirp-Evoked VEMPs: A Test-Retest Reliability Study
    Reddy, Tarryn Marisca
    Heinze, Barbara
    Biagio-de Jager, Leigh
    Maes, Leen
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (01): : 207 - 218
  • [46] Evoked γ oscillations in human scalp EEG are test-retest reliable
    Fruend, Ingo
    Schadow, Jeanette
    Busch, Niko A.
    Koerner, Ursula
    Herrmann, Christoph S.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (01) : 221 - 227
  • [47] TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL PARAMETERS
    STRENGE, H
    EEG-EMG-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ELEKTROENZEPHALOGRAPHIE ELEKTROMYOGRAPHIE UND VERWANDTE GEBIETE, 1989, 20 (03): : 147 - 152
  • [48] The vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A test-retest reliability study
    Maes, Leen
    Vinck, Bart M.
    De Vel, Eddy
    D'haenens, Wendy
    Bockstael, Annelies
    Keppler, Hannah
    Philips, Birgit
    Swinnen, Freya
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (03) : 594 - 600
  • [49] Test-retest reliability of acoustic and linguistic measures of speech tasks
    Feng, Feifan
    Zhang, Zhenglin
    Tang, Lijuan
    Qian, Haisheng
    Yang, Li-Zhuang
    Jiang, Haihe
    Li, Hai
    COMPUTER SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2023, 83
  • [50] Evoked EEG Responses to TMS Targeting Regions Outside the Primary Motor Cortex and Their Test-Retest Reliability
    Song, Yufei
    Gordon, Pedro C.
    Metsomaa, Johanna
    Rostami, Maryam
    Belardinelli, Paolo
    Ziemann, Ulf
    BRAIN TOPOGRAPHY, 2024, 37 (01) : 19 - 36