Variability in diagnostic evaluation and criteria for gestational diabetes

被引:52
|
作者
Solomon, CG
Willett, WC
RichEdwards, J
Hunter, DJ
Stampfer, MJ
Colditz, GA
Manson, JE
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,CHANNING LAB,BOSTON,MA 02115
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,DIV PREVENT MED,BOSTON,MA 02115
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH MED,BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,DEPT MED,BOSTON,MA 02115
[4] HARVARD UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT NUTR,BOSTON,MA 02115
[5] HARVARD UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT EPIDEMIOL,BOSTON,MA 02115
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.19.1.12
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To determine the frequency of screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) among a population receiving regular prenatal care and to assess the extent to which National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria for the diagnosis of GDM are used by practicing obstetricians. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - We studied participants in the Nurses' Health Study II, a large prospective cohort study of 116,678 nurses aged 25-42 years in 1989. A total of 422 women who reported a first diagnosis of GDM between 1989 and 1991 were sent supplementary questionnaires regarding diagnosis and treatment, and medical records were requested for a subset of 120 to validate self-reported GDM and assess criteria used for diagnosis. A sample of 100 women who reported a pregnancy not complicated by GDM were sent questionnaires addressing GDM screening and prenatal care. RESULTS - Among a sample of 93 women who reported a pregnancy not complicated by GDM and responded to the supplementary questionnaire, 16 (17%) reported no glucose loading test, 69% of unscreened women had one or more risk factors for GDM. Among a sample of 114 women who self-reported GDM in a singleton pregnancy and whose medical records were available for review, a physician diagnosis of GDM was confirmed in 107 (94%). Records and supplementary questionnaires indicated that oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) were per formed in 96 (86%) of these women. Of women with a physician diagnosis of GDM whose OGTT results were available, 25% failed to meet NDDG criteria for this diagnosis, although all had evidence of abnormal glucose homeostasis. CONCLUSIONS - Screening for GDM is not universal, even among a group of health professionals in whom screening prevalence is likely to be higher than in the general population. Diagnostic criteria for GDM among obstetricians in practice remain nonstandard despite NDDG recommendations. Better understanding of the implications of differing degrees of glucose intolerance and of varying GDM screening and management strategies is required to make policy recommendations for appropriate and cost-effective care.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 16
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (WS 331-2011)
    Yang Hui-xia
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (07) : 1212 - 1213
  • [42] Effects of Changing Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Queensland, Australia
    Meloncelli, Nina J. L.
    Barnett, Adrian G.
    D'Emden, Michael
    De Jersey, Susan J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (05): : 1215 - 1221
  • [43] The comparison of the prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes by the change of diagnostic criteria
    Oh, E
    Oh, K
    Lee, D
    Oh, S
    Jung, K
    Chang, Y
    Roh, S
    Yoon, K
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2002, 45 : A286 - A286
  • [44] Estimated impact of introduction of new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus
    de Wit, Leon
    Zijlmans, Anna B.
    Rademaker, Doortje
    Naaktgeboren, Christiana A.
    DeVries, J. Hans
    Franx, Arie
    Painter, Rebecca C.
    van Rijn, Bas B.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2021, 12 (06)
  • [45] Controversies in Screening and Diagnostic Criteria for Gestational Diabetes in Early and Late Pregnancy
    Huhn, Evelyn A.
    Rossi, Simona W.
    Hoesli, Irene
    Goebl, Christian S.
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [46] GESTATIONAL DIABETES: OVERVIEW OF THE NEW CONSENSUS SCREENING STRATEGY AND DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
    Benhalima, K.
    Van Crombrugge, P.
    Hanssens, M.
    Devlieger, R.
    Verhaeghe, J.
    Mathieu, C.
    ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2012, 67 (04) : 255 - 261
  • [47] Gestational diabetes: the impact of new diagnostic criteria on prevalence and pregnancy outcomes
    Koning, S. H.
    van Zanden, J. J.
    Hoogenberg, K.
    van Loon, A. J.
    Korteweg, F. J.
    Lutgers, H. L.
    van den Berg, P. P.
    Wolffenbuttel, B. H. R.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2017, 60 : S439 - S439
  • [48] INFLUENCE OF DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA ON THE INCIDENCE OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES AND PERINATAL MORBIDITY
    MAGEE, MS
    WALDEN, CE
    BENEDETTI, TJ
    KNOPP, RH
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 269 (05): : 609 - 615
  • [49] Is the evidence strong enough to change the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes now?
    Visser, Gerard H. A.
    de Valk, Harold W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (04) : 260 - 264
  • [50] CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES-MELLITUS
    DASSIE, A
    FESTA, A
    HAWLICZEK, R
    PFLEGER, C
    SCHERNTHANER, G
    DIABETOLOGIA, 1994, 37 : A174 - A174