Conservative treatment of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) of the cervix

被引:22
|
作者
Lee, SSN [1 ]
Collins, RJ
Pun, TC
Cheng, DKL
Ngan, HYS
机构
[1] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Pathol, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL); cytology; colposcopy; histology; conservative treatment;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(97)00219-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the accuracy of the cervical smear and colposcopy in diagnosing low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and the natural history of LSIL. Method: The cytological, colposcopic and histological findings of 145 patients with a smear diagnosis of LSIL were compared, and the final outcome studied. Results: The diagnosis of LSIL either by cytology alone or in combination with colposcopy was associated with a rate of overdiagnosis of 11.7% and 6.9%, respectively, and a rate of underdiagnosis of 31.0% and 26.2%, respectively. Spontaneous regression of lesions occurred in 81.1% of patients with proven LSIL, with regression within 24 months in 4/5 of cases. Conclusions: The degree of dysplasia shown in the cervical smear correlated poorly with histology. All patients with cervical smear showing LSIL should have colposcopy and colposcopic-directed biopsy to exclude the presence of more advanced lesions. In the absence of some serious lesions, it is then acceptable to observe the patient for 24 months before adopting definite treatment, as spontaneous regression is common. (C) 1998 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 40
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Co-Existence of low and high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix: Morphologic progression or multiple papillomaviruses?
    Park, JJ
    Sun, D
    Genest, DR
    Trivijitsilp, P
    Crum, CP
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 1998, 11 (01) : 110A - 110A
  • [32] Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high risk HPV status: Effect of age on follow-up with high grade cervical lesions
    Ko, V.
    Tambouret, R. H.
    Wilbur, D. C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2007, 20 : 73A - 74A
  • [33] Prevalence of High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) and Invasive Cervical Cancer in Patients with Low Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (LSIL) at Cervical Pap Smear
    Khuakoonratt, Nathaya
    Tangjitgamol, Siriwan
    Manusirivithaya, Sumonmal
    Khunnarong, Jakkapan
    Pataradule, Kamol
    Thavaramara, Thaovalai
    Suekwattana, Pachuen
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2008, 9 (02) : 253 - 257
  • [34] Low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high risk HPV status: Effect of age on follow-up with high grade cervical lesions
    Ko, V.
    Tambouret, R. H.
    Wilbur, D. C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 73A - 74A
  • [35] Treatment Options for High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions
    Long, Stephanie
    Leeman, Lawrence
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2013, 40 (02) : 291 - +
  • [36] Altered expression of desmosomal components in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix
    Alazawi, WOF
    Morris, LS
    Stanley, MA
    Garrod, DR
    Coleman, N
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2003, 443 (01) : 51 - 56
  • [37] Two major pathways of recurrent high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix
    Reich, Olaf
    Regauer, Sigrid
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 137 (10) : 2520 - 2521
  • [38] Altered expression of desmosomal components in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix
    W. O. F. Alazawi
    L. S. Morris
    M. A. Stanley
    D. R. Garrod
    N. Coleman
    Virchows Archiv, 2003, 443 : 51 - 56
  • [39] Two Major Pathways for Development of High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Cervix
    Reich, Olaf
    Regauer, Sigrid
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 38 (11) : 1579 - 1580
  • [40] Should "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" be a distinct cytologic category?
    Owens, C. L.
    Rojas, D. N.
    Burroughs, F. H.
    Gustafson, K. S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2007, 87 : 78A - 79A