Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Sedation in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation: A Clinical Trial Study Protocol

被引:34
|
作者
Liu, Yongjun [1 ]
Chen, Chuanxi [1 ]
Liu, Ning [1 ]
Tong, Li [1 ]
Nie, Yao [1 ]
Wu, Jianfeng [1 ]
Liu, Xiao [2 ]
Gao, Wei [2 ]
Tang, Lei [3 ]
Guan, Xiangdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Crit Care Med, 58 Zhongshan 2nd Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Haisco Pharmaceut Grp Co Ltd, Dept Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Good Clin Practice, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Propofol; Sedation; Anesthesia; Mechanical ventilation; Ciprofol; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; PROPOFOL; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; DELIRIUM; ADULTS; IMPACT; SLEEP; PAIN;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-021-01877-6
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: From previous studies of pharmacodynamic data in mice, rats, beagle dogs and mini pigs, frequently in direct comparison to induction doses of propofol, ciprofol produced a rapid onset of anesthesia/sedation. Methods: A phase 1 study suggested potential clinical advantages of ciprofol as a sedation/anesthetic agent, with no evidence of drug-related toxicity. However, the sedation effects and safety of ciprofol in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation should be further confirmed in a phase 3 study with a larger cohort of patients. During a phase 3, non- inferiority, multicenter, single-blind, randomized, propofol controlled trial, Chinese ICU patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and requiring endotracheal intubation will be sedated for 6-24 h after randomization. Considering a success rate for ICU sedation of 99% for ciprofol and the positive control drug propofol, a total sample size of 120 subjects with mechanical ventilation will be required to achieve 80% power to determine non-inferiority with a margin of 8%. Finally, taking into account 10% losses, 135 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to ciprofol (90 cases) and propofol (45 cases) groups in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome will be the success rate of sedation satisfied by the following conditions: the time within the range of Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (+ 1 similar to -2) must account for >= 70% of the study drug administration time and without other rescue treatments. Secondary outcomes will include the average time to reach the sedation goal, study drug usage, rescue medication given per unit weight, extubation time, recovery time to full consciousness and nursing scores. Safety endpoints will include adverse events (AEs), drug related AEs and serious AEs. Planned Outcomes: The results of this study will provide crucial information on the use of ciprofol for sedation of patients in ICUs.
引用
收藏
页码:5412 / 5423
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Efficacy and safety of continuous sedation for agitated patients under noninvasive ventilation
    Matsumoto, Takeshi
    Kawamura, Takahisa
    Tamai, Koji
    Takeshita, Junpei
    Tanaka, Kosuke
    Monden, Kazuya
    Nagata, Kazuma
    Otsuka, Kyoko
    Nakagawa, Atsushi
    Tachikawa, Ryo
    Otsuka, Kojiro
    Tomii, Keisuke
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2012, 40
  • [32] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for the induction of anesthesia in adult patients: a multicenter phase 2a clinical trial
    Zhu, Qianmei
    Luo, Zhen
    Wang, Xia
    Wang, Dongxin
    Li, Jun
    Wei, Xinchuan
    Tang, Jun
    Yao, Shanglong
    Ouyang, Wen
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Zuo, Yunxia
    Wang, Xiao
    Liu, Jin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (02) : 473 - 482
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings
    Zhong, Jing
    Zhang, Jinlin
    Fan, Yu
    Zhu, Min
    Zhao, Xining
    Zuo, Zhiyi
    Zhou, Xiushi
    Miao, Changhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 85
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for the induction of anesthesia in adult patients: a multicenter phase 2a clinical trial
    Qianmei Zhu
    Zhen Luo
    Xia Wang
    Dongxin Wang
    Jun Li
    Xinchuan Wei
    Jun Tang
    Shanglong Yao
    Wen Ouyang
    Wensheng Zhang
    Yunxia Zuo
    Xiao Wang
    Jin Liu
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 473 - 482
  • [35] NO SEDATION FOR CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS UNDERGOING MECHANICAL VENTILATION: A MULTICENTER TRIAL
    Strom, Thomas
    Olsen, Hanne
    Nedergaard, Helene
    Toft, Palle
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12)
  • [36] Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Short-term Sedation in Postoperative Obstetric Patients on Mechanical Ventilation: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Raj, Anchal
    Singh, Vipin Kumar
    Tiwari, Tanmay
    Sahu, Sandeep
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (04) : UC01 - UC04
  • [37] Feeding ICU Patients on Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Designing the Optimal Protocol
    Reignier, Jean
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (12) : 2825 - 2826
  • [38] Efficacy and safety of analgesia based sedation of mechanical ventilated patients
    Malenkovic, V. M.
    Vojinovic-Golubovic, V.
    Nedic, O.
    Marinkovic, O.
    3RD WORLD CONGRESS OF TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANAESTHESIA & TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSION, 2011, : 67 - 71
  • [39] Safety and efficacy of edaravone for patients with acute stroke A protocol for randomized clinical trial
    Shan, Hailei
    Jiao, Guangmei
    Cheng, Xi
    Dou, Zhijie
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (08) : E24811
  • [40] The efficacy and safety of implementing a glycemic control protocol in ICU patients
    Bui, Yen H.
    Hasson, Noelle K.
    O'Leary-Kelley, Colleen
    Miyahara, Randell K.
    Barr, Juliana
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (12) : A135 - A135