Biochemical Methane Potential of Swine Slaughter Waste, Swine Slurry, and Its Codigestion Effect

被引:6
|
作者
Renggaman, Anriansyah [1 ,2 ]
Choi, Hong Lim [1 ,3 ]
Sudiarto, Sartika Indah Amalia [1 ,4 ]
Febrisiantosa, Andi [1 ,5 ]
Ahn, Dong Hyoen [6 ]
Choung, Yong Wook [6 ]
Suresh, Arumuganainar [7 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Res Inst Agr & Life Sci, Dept Agr Biotechnol, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[2] Inst Teknol Bandung, Sch Life Sci & Technol, Microbial Biotechnol Res Grp, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
[3] Resourcificat Res Ctr Crop Anim Farming, Seoul 08800, South Korea
[4] Inst Teknol Bandung, Sch Life Sci & Technol, Ecol Res Grp, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
[5] Indonesian Inst Sci, Res Unit Nat Prod Technol, Yogyakarta 55861, Indonesia
[6] GreenLabs, Seoul 05854, South Korea
[7] Suguna Foods Private Ltd, Waste Management Unit, Udumalaipettai 642126, India
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
anaerobic digestion; swine slaughter waste; swine slurry; codigestion; CH4; production; lag phase period; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; HEADSPACE PRESSURE; ORGANIC FRACTION; INOCULUM RATIO; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PIG MANURE; SUBSTRATE; BATCH; PERFORMANCE; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3390/en14217103
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The codigestion of slaughter waste with animal manure can improve its methane yield, and digestion parameters; however, limited studies are available for the effectiveness of anaerobic codigestion using swine slaughter waste (SSW) and swine slurry (SS). Hence, this study was conducted to determine the characteristics of SSW and the effect of anaerobic codigestion with (SS) and explored the potential of CH4 production (M-max), the lag phase period (A), and effective digestion time (T-eff). SSW contains fat and protein contents of 54% and 30% dry weight within 18.2% of solid matters, whereas SS showed only 6% and 28% within 4.1% of solid matters, respectively. During sole anaerobic digestion, SSW produced a high M-max (711 Nml CH4/g VSadded) but had a long duration A (similar to 9 days); whereas SS produced a low M-max (516 Nml CH4/g VSadded) but had a shorter duration A (1 day). Codigestion increased the M-max from 22-84% with no significant T-eff compared to sole SS digestion. However, the low M-max of SS and high M-max of SSW, resulted in a 7-32% decrease in M-max at codigestion compared to SSW sole digestion. Codigestion improved the digestion efficiency as it reduced lambda (3.3-8.5 days shorter) and T-eff (6.5-9.1 days faster) compared to SSW sole digestion. The substrate-to-inoculum ratio of 0.5 was better than 1; the volatile solid and micronutrient availability may be attributed to improved digestion. These results can be used for the better management of SSW and SS for bio-energy production on a large scale.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Methane emission factor of open deposits used to store swine slurry in Southern Brazil
    Sarda, Luana Goulart
    Higarashi, Martha Mayumi
    Nicoloso, Rodrigo da Silveira
    Victoria de Oliveira, Paulo Armando
    Falkoski, Camila
    Siega Ribeiro, Stephanie Mayara
    Coldebella, Arlei
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2018, 53 (06) : 657 - 663
  • [22] BIOCHEMICAL METHANE POTENTIAL OF BIOMASS AND WASTE FEEDSTOCKS
    CHYNOWETH, DP
    TURICK, CE
    OWENS, JM
    JERGER, DE
    PECK, MW
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 1993, 5 (01): : 95 - 111
  • [23] Comparison of the methane potential obtained by anaerobic codigestion of urban solid waste and lignocellulosic biomass
    Romero, H., I
    Vega, C. A.
    Zuma, J. D.
    Pesantez, F. F.
    Camacho, A. G.
    Redrovan, F. F.
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 : 776 - 780
  • [24] Prediction of the nutrients value and biochemical characteristics of swine slurry by measurement of EC - Electrical conductivity
    Suresh, A.
    Choi, H. L.
    Oh, D. I.
    Moon, O. K.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (20) : 4683 - 4689
  • [25] Effect of slaughter weight on slaughter performance of a native swine breed "Ghungroo" of Duars' Valley and allied zone
    Khan, Anupam
    Patra, Dipanwita
    Patra, Gopal
    Biswas, Subhasish
    VETERINARY WORLD, 2010, 3 (11) : 509 - 511
  • [26] WASTE BEEF FAT IN SWINE RATIONS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS EFFECT ON CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS
    KROPF, DH
    PEARSON, AM
    WALLACE, HD
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1953, 12 (04) : 902 - 902
  • [27] A POTENTIAL TREATMENT ALTERNATIVE FOR SWINE WASTE-WATER IN THE TROPICS
    YANG, PY
    NAGANO, SY
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1985, 17 (4-5) : 819 - 831
  • [28] EFFECT OF SWINE WASTE RECYCLED TO PIGS ON THE QUALITY OF THEIR MEAT
    GILKA, J
    HABRDA, J
    KREJCI, P
    KLIKOVA, A
    MATYAS, Z
    ARCHIV FUR TIERERNAHRUNG-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION, 1984, 34 (03): : 247 - 253
  • [29] EFFECT OF SEASON AND PIG SIZE ON SWINE WASTE PRODUCTION
    BRUMM, MC
    SUTTON, AL
    JONES, DD
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1980, 23 (01): : 165 - 168
  • [30] Effect of swine slurry on alfalfa production and on tissue and soil nutrient concentration
    Lloveras, J
    Arán, M
    Villar, P
    Ballesta, A
    Arcaya, A
    Vilanova, X
    Delgado, I
    Muñoz, F
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (04) : 986 - 991