Clinical Efficacy of Posterior Percutaneous Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy with Bilateral Decompression for Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

被引:12
|
作者
Zhao, Xiao-bing [1 ]
Ma, Ya-jie [1 ]
Ma, Hai-jun [1 ]
Zhang, Xin-yu [1 ]
Zhou, Hong-gang [1 ]
机构
[1] Third Hosp Henan Prov, Dept Mini Invas Spinal Surg, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy; Delta system; Unilateral approach bilateral decompression; OPEN-DOOR; ANTERIOR; FUSION; LAMINOPLASTY; ARTHROPLASTY; DISKECTOMY; LAMINECTOMY;
D O I
10.1111/os.13237
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic unilateral laminotomy (PPEUL) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of single-segment spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods This is a retrospective research, from January 2017 to December 2019, 30 cases were included in the PPEUL group and 32 cases were included in the ACDF group. The operative duration, blood loss, length of stay, complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, MacNab classification and imaging data were collected preoperatively, postoperative 1-week, final follow-up and statistically analyzed. Results The surgery was completed successfully on all patients, and there were no serious complications, such as nerve or spinal cord injury or infection. In the PPEUL and ACDF groups, the operative duration were 56.63 +/- 1.40 and 65.21 +/- 2.45 min, the intraoperative blood loss were 51.69 +/- 3.23 and 50.51 +/- 5.48 mL, and the hospitalization duration was 5.75 +/- 1.43 and 6.38 +/- 2.16 days. The follow-up period in the PPEUL and ACDF groups was 24.96 +/- 1.12 months and 25.65 +/- 1.45 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups, but the hospitalization and operative durations in the PPEUL group were significantly shorter than those in the ACDF group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores at postoperative 1 week and final follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery. The JOA scores at postoperative 1 week and final follow-up were significantly improved compared with those before surgery, but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the last follow-up. The intervertebral disc height of the adjacent segment at the last follow-up was significantly lower in the ACDF group than in the PPEUL group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in the intervertebral disc height of the surgical segment (P > 0.05). The rate of excellent and good results was 90.0% and 87.5%, respectively. Postoperative cervical CT and MRI showed that the spinal canal was fully decompressed and spinal cord compression was relieved. Conclusion PPEUL has the advantages of reduced trauma, rapid recovery and remarkable curative efficacy, so it is a new choice for the treatment of CSM.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 884
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Removal of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Anterior Decompression for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Wang, Xinwei
    Chen, Yu
    Chen, Deyu
    Yuan, Wen
    Zhao, Jie
    Jia, Lianshun
    Zhao, Dinglin
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (06): : 404 - 407
  • [22] Percutaneous Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Vs. Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    He, Li-Ming
    Li, Jia-Rui
    Wu, Hao-Ran
    Chang, Qiang
    Guan, Xiao-Ming
    Ma, Zhuo
    Feng, Hao-Yu
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [23] Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Du, Wei
    Wang, Hai-Xu
    Zhang, Jing-Tao
    Wang, Feng
    Zhang, Xu
    Shen, Yong
    Chen, Rong
    Zhang, Li
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [24] Posterior Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic Cervical Laminectomy and Decompression for Cervical Stenosis with Myelopathy: A Technical Note
    Lin, Yongpeng
    Rao, Siyuan
    Li, Yongjin
    Zhao, Shuai
    Chen, Bolai
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 124 : 350 - 357
  • [25] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of anterior 'skip' corpectomy versus posterior decompression in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Qian, Lie
    Shao, Jiang
    Liu, Zude
    Cheng, Liming
    Zeng, Zhili
    Jia, Yongwei
    Li, Xinfeng
    Wang, Hantao
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2014, 9
  • [26] Biomechanical comparison of percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
    Ren, Jiabin
    Li, Rui
    Zhu, Kai
    Han, Xuexin
    Liu, Xin
    He, Yu
    Sun, Zhaozhong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [27] Comparison of the safety and efficacy of anterior ‘skip’ corpectomy versus posterior decompression in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy
    Lie Qian
    Jiang Shao
    Zude Liu
    Liming Cheng
    Zhili Zeng
    Yongwei Jia
    Xinfeng Li
    Hantao Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 9
  • [28] Biomechanical comparison of percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy and anterior cervical decompression and fusion on the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy
    Jiabin Ren
    Rui Li
    Kai Zhu
    Xuexin Han
    Xin Liu
    Yu He
    Zhaozhong Sun
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14
  • [29] Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Decompression versus Segmental Fusion and Posterior Expansive Canal Plasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
    Xia, Chen
    Shi, Fangfang
    Chen, Chuyong
    Lv, Jun
    Chen, Qi
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [30] CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY - TREATMENT WITH POSTERIOR DECOMPRESSION AND LUQUE RECTANGLE BONE FUSION
    MAURER, PK
    ELLENBOGEN, RG
    ECKLUND, J
    SIMONDS, GR
    VANDAM, B
    ONDRA, SL
    NEUROSURGERY, 1991, 28 (05) : 680 - 684