Barnes maze performance of Octodon degus is gender dependent

被引:24
|
作者
Popovic, Natalija [2 ,3 ]
Antonio Madrid, Juan [2 ,3 ]
Angeles Rol, Maria [2 ,3 ]
Caballero-Bleda, Maria [1 ,2 ]
Popovic, Miroljub [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Fac Med, Dept Human Anat & Psychobiol, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[2] Univ Murcia, Inst Aging, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[3] Univ Murcia, Fac Biol, Chronobiol Lab, Dept Physiol, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
关键词
Barnes maze; Gender differences; Octodon degus; Spatial learning and memory; LONG-EVANS RATS; INDUCED RECEPTOR CHANGES; SPATIAL WORKING-MEMORY; RADIAL-ARM MAZE; SEX-DIFFERENCES; ESTROUS-CYCLE; DIURNAL RODENT; WATER MAZE; MATERNAL VOCALIZATIONS; PREFRONTAL CORTEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Gender differences in spatial navigation have been widely reported in nocturnal rodent species. Here, for the first time we report gender differences in spatial learning and memory of Octodon degus, a long-lived diurnal hystricomorph rodent. In the present study, 16 months old male and female O. degus were tested in the 18-holes Barnes circular maze. The acquisition session consisted of four daily 4 min trials, during 10 days. Seven days later, the retention test was performed. To avoid the effect of hormonal fluctuation on spatial navigation, both the acquisition and the retention tests, were performed in 21-day regular cycling females in a period that corresponds to the diestrus phase of the estrus cycle. At the beginning of the acquisition, female degus were significantly slower than males to find the escape hole, but the situation reversed afterwards. Moreover, during the course of acquisition, females made significantly less reference memory errors, working memory errors as well as omission errors, than males. In both sexes, motivation and learning ceiling effects were reached at days 5-6 of the training. During the acquisition, females used more frequently a spatial strategy, while males preferably applied either serial, random or opposite strategies. The observed cognitive differences between male and female O. degus existed only during the acquisition period but not during the retention, indicating that acquisition and consolidation are differently influenced by gender. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 167
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Endometritis in pregnant Degu (Octodon degus)
    Bonecka, J.
    Grodzka, A.
    Degorska, B.
    Kalwas-Sliwinska, M.
    Kaszak, I.
    Jurka, P.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2016, 51 : 77 - 77
  • [22] Ageing and testicular function in Octodon degus
    Obregon, EB
    Ramirez, O
    ANDROLOGIA, 1997, 29 (06) : 319 - 326
  • [23] Female degus (Octodon degus) monitor their environment while foraging socially
    Verónica Quirici
    Rodrigo A. Castro
    Javiera Oyarzún
    Luis A. Ebensperger
    Animal Cognition, 2008, 11 : 441 - 448
  • [24] THE RETE TESTIS IN THE OCTODON-DEGUS
    PRADO, F
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1986, 19 (02): : R241 - R241
  • [25] Husbandry and management of the degu (Octodon degus)
    Najecki, DL
    Tate, BA
    LAB ANIMAL, 1999, 28 (03) : 54 - 57
  • [26] OVOGENESIS AND FOLICULOGENESIS IN THE OCTODON-DEGUS
    LEIVA, J
    MORALES, B
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1986, 19 (02): : R220 - R220
  • [27] ABP PRESENCE IN OCTODON DEGUS (MOLINA)
    BALBONTIN, J
    BUSTOSOBREGON, E
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1986, 19 (01): : R87 - R87
  • [28] Inter-Population Variation in Hoarding Behaviour in Degus, Octodon degus
    Quispe, Rene
    Villavicencio, Camila P.
    Cortes, Arturo
    Vasquez, Rodrigo A.
    ETHOLOGY, 2009, 115 (05) : 465 - 474
  • [29] RECOLLECTION OF WHAT-WHERE-WHICH MEMORY IN DEGUS (OCTODON DEGUS)
    Betsuyaku, Toru
    Tsuzuki, Mana
    Fujita, Kazuo
    PSYCHOLOGIA, 2016, 59 (2-3) : 148 - 162
  • [30] Mother-offspring recognition in communally nesting degus, Octodon degus
    Jesseau, Stephanie A.
    Holmes, Warren G.
    Lee, Theresa M.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2008, 75 : 573 - 582