Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis

被引:113
|
作者
Wu, Yunyi [1 ]
Wang, Guanyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Biol, Guangdong Prov Key Lab Cell Microenvirom & Dis Re, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
toxicity prediction; machine learning; deep learning; transcriptome; chemical structure; molecular fingerprint; molecular fragment; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORK; INDUCED GENE-EXPRESSION; DATA-BANK HSDB; BIOLOGICAL-ACTIVITY; PATTERN-RECOGNITION; VARIABLE SELECTION; SMALL MOLECULES; IN-VITRO; DATABASE; QSAR;
D O I
10.3390/ijms19082358
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Toxicity prediction is very important to public health. Among its many applications, toxicity prediction is essential to reduce the cost and labor of a drug's preclinical and clinical trials, because a lot of drug evaluations (cellular, animal, and clinical) can be spared due to the predicted toxicity. In the era of Big Data and artificial intelligence, toxicity prediction can benefit from machine learning, which has been widely used in many fields such as natural language processing, speech recognition, image recognition, computational chemistry, and bioinformatics, with excellent performance. In this article, we review machine learning methods that have been applied to toxicity prediction, including deep learning, random forests, k-nearest neighbors, and support vector machines. We also discuss the input parameter to the machine learning algorithm, especially its shift from chemical structural description only to that combined with human transcriptome data analysis, which can greatly enhance prediction accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Prediction and Analysis of Acoustic Metamaterial Based on Machine Learning
    Sun, Yang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS, 2022, 31 (02)
  • [32] Machine Learning for Stock Prediction Based on Fundamental Analysis
    Huang, Yuxuan
    Capretz, Luiz Fernando
    Ho, Danny
    2021 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2021), 2021,
  • [33] Review of machine learning and deep learning models for toxicity prediction
    Guo, Wenjing
    Liu, Jie
    Dong, Fan
    Song, Meng
    Li, Zoe
    Khan, Md Kamrul Hasan
    Patterson, Tucker A.
    Hong, Huixiao
    EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 248 (21) : 1952 - 1973
  • [34] A machine learning model for parameter correlation analysis and structural deformation prediction
    Chen, Cheng
    Wang, Zhansheng
    Shi, Peixin
    Jia, Pengjiao
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL, AUTOMATION AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, CMAEE, 2022, : 13 - 19
  • [35] Prediction of heavy metal toxicity and ecological risk based on machine learning methods
    Li, Guo-Feng
    Yu, Jin-Qiu
    Wang, Hong
    Chi, Hai-Feng
    Lin, Shan-Na
    Cai, Chao
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (12): : 7001 - 7010
  • [36] Drug-Induced Immune Thrombocytopenia Toxicity Prediction Based on Machine Learning
    Wang, Binyou
    Tan, Xiaoqiu
    Guo, Jianmin
    Xiao, Ting
    Jiao, Yan
    Zhao, Junlin
    Wu, Jianming
    Wang, Yiwei
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2022, 14 (05)
  • [37] Machine learning-driven oral-to-inhalation extrapolation for chemical toxicity value prediction
    Matsumura, K.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2024, 399 : S256 - S257
  • [38] In silico prediction of chemical acute contact toxicity on honey bees via machine learning methods
    Xu, Xuan
    Zhao, Piaopiao
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Zhang, Xiaoxiao
    Wu, Zengrui
    Li, Weihua
    Tang, Yun
    Liu, Guixia
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 2021, 72
  • [39] Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point
    Cavasotto, Claudio N.
    Scardino, Valeria
    ACS OMEGA, 2022, 7 (51): : 47536 - 47546
  • [40] Prediction of Synergism from Chemical-Genetic Interactions by Machine Learning
    Wildenhain, Jan
    Spitzer, Michaela
    Dolma, Sonam
    Jarvik, Nick
    White, Rachel
    Roy, Marcia
    Griffiths, Emma
    Bellows, David S.
    Wright, Gerard D.
    Tyers, Mike
    CELL SYSTEMS, 2015, 1 (06) : 383 - 395