Turbulence Modeling in Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers Subject to Convex Wall Curvature

被引:3
|
作者
Lagares-Nieves, Christian J. [1 ]
Santiago, Jean [1 ]
Araya, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Puerto Rico, Dept Mech Engn, High Performance Comp & Visualizat Lab, Mayaguez, PR 00681 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; PRESSURE-GRADIENT; FLOW;
D O I
10.2514/1.J060247
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Hypersonic boundary layers are crucial in aerospace applications such as hypersonic glide vehicles, rockets, and other advanced space vehicles. Hypersonic flows present unique transport phenomena, including nonnegligible flow compression/dilation, extra strain rates, and large momentum/thermal gradients. In this paper, the performance of three widely used turbulence models is compared, namely, the standard k - omega, the shear stress transport (SST) k - omega, and the Spalart-Allmaras (SA). Based on our turbulence modeling assessment plus the analysis of turbulent transport equation budgets over the experimental geometry from a previous study at a Mach number of 4.9, a moderate supremacy of SA over two equation models was found. To back our conclusions, previous experiments and direct numerical simulations at Mach numbers around 5 have been employed. Overall, the three considered models exhibited a consistent ability to predict first-order statistics both inside and outside the boundary layer. The SST variants were capable of describing the amplification of the constant shear layer induced by the presence of an adverse pressure gradient (APG). Furthermore, the SST k - omega model also replicated the second peak of turbulence production induced by the concave wall. There was a more aggressive distortion of the boundary layer by APG than by favorable pressure gradient (FPG) as compared with a zero pressure gradient (ZPG) boundary layer. A reasonable performance by Walz's equation in the FPG region is also shown, whereas a notable lack of agreement is seen in the APG. Overall, one could argue for the SA model's best compromise between accurate predictions, numerical stability, and mesh resolution insensitivity in the FPG and ZPG regions, particularly, in outer or integral boundary-layer parameters such as delta or Re-delta 2. That being said, the two-equation models are far superior in terms of predicting near-wall parameters (such as u(tau) or u'v') or their ability to accurately describe the physics of the hypersonic boundary layer for APG regions (for instance, outer-secondary peaks of turbulent kinetic energy production).
引用
收藏
页码:4935 / 4954
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A MIXING-LENGTH MODEL FOR THE PREDICTION OF CONVEX CURVATURE EFFECTS ON TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYERS
    ADAMS, EW
    JOHNSTON, JP
    MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 1983, 105 (06) : 88 - 88
  • [42] Experiments on the structure and scaling of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers
    Williams, Owen J. H.
    Sahoo, Dipankar
    Baumgartner, Mark L.
    Smiths, Alexander J.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 834 : 237 - 270
  • [43] Large Eddy Simulation of Hypersonic Turbulent Boundary Layers
    Kianvashrad, Nadia
    Knight, Doyle
    FLUIDS, 2021, 6 (12)
  • [44] TRANSFORMATION OF HYPERSONIC TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS TO INCOMPRESSIBLE FORM
    WATSON, RD
    CARY, AM
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1967, 5 (06) : 1202 - &
  • [45] EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS IN HYPERSONIC FLOW
    LOBB, RK
    WINKLER, EM
    PERSH, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1955, 22 (01): : 1 - &
  • [46] ROUGH WALL TURBULENT BOUNDARY LAYERS
    PERRY, AE
    SCHOFIEL.WH
    JOUBERT, PN
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1969, 37 : 383 - &
  • [47] Concave-wall turbulent boundary layers without and with free-stream turbulence
    You, Jiho
    Buchta, David A.
    Zaki, Tamer A.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 915
  • [48] FREE-STREAM TURBULENCE EFFECTS ON CONVEX-CURVED TURBULENT BOUNDARY-LAYERS
    YOU, SM
    SIMON, TW
    KIM, J
    JOURNAL OF HEAT TRANSFER-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1989, 111 (01): : 66 - 72
  • [49] Modification of near-wall turbulence in turbulent boundary layers due to a perforated structure
    Hoang, V. T.
    Jafari, A.
    Cazzolato, B.
    Arjomandi, M.
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2024, 36 (07)
  • [50] The Streamwise Turbulence Intensity - A Comparison between Smooth and Rough Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers
    Segalini, A.
    Orlu, R.
    Castro, Ian P.
    Alfredsson, P. Henrik
    PROGRESS IN TURBULENCE V, 2014, 149 : 97 - 101