Alternative fall and winter feeding systems for spring calving beef cows

被引:39
|
作者
McCartney, D
Basarab, JA
Okine, EK
Baron, VS
Depalme, AJ
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Western Forage Beef Grp, Res Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[2] Alberta Agr Food & Rural Dev, Western Forage Beef Grp, Res Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Food Nutr & Agr Sci, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P5, Canada
关键词
beef cows; Western Canadian Parkland; swath grazing; alternate day; early and late weaning;
D O I
10.4141/A03-069
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Alternative fall and winter feeding systems for spring calving beef cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 84: 511-522. This study evaluated the effects of early (EW) and late (LW) weaning on calf post-weaning growth performance and carcass characteristics. It also quantified the effects of EW and LW in combination with three winter feeding strategies on cow growth, reproductive performance and cost of production. EW calves were weaned in late August,, while LW calves were weaned 56 d later in late October. The three cow winter feeding strategies were: (1) traditional (TD), or straw fed ad libitum and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) silage fed every day; (2) alternate day (AD), or straw fed ad libitum and equivalent amounts of barley silage fed every second day (AD); and (3) swath graze (SG), or swath grazing whole-plant barley, cut in the soft dough stage. The study was conducted over three production cycles (1997/1998, 1998/1999 and 1999/2000). EW calves weighing 213 kg and fed a backgrounding diet (82% barley silage: 18% concentrate) for 56 d, grew 0.36 kg d(-1) (EW = 0.61 +/- 0.02 kg d(-1); LW = 0.97 +/- 0.02 kg d(-1); P < 0.001) slower from early to late weaning than LW calves (210 kg) on pasture nursing their mothers. Over the next 124-128 d, EW and LW calves fed the backgrounding diet grew similarly at 0.95 +/- 0.01 and 0.93 +/- 0.02 kg d(-1), respectively. Both groups of calves also grew similarly during the finishing phase (EW = 1.56 +/- 0.04 kg d(-1); LW 1.53 +/- 0.05 kg d(-1); P = 0.62), such that at slaughter, EW and LW calves were the same age (461 +/- 4 vs. 455 +/- 5 d, P = 0.326) and weight (522 +/- 5 vs. 515 +/- 6 kg, P = 0.390), with similar levels of carcass backfat, yield and quality grade. EW cows weighed 12 to 15 kg more (P < 0.01) in mid-November (first winter feeding), mid-February (pre-calving) and late-May (prebreeding) and tended to have a shorter calving span (49 vs. 62 d, P = 0.07) than the LW cows. Calving interval, calving pattern and cumulative open and cull rates, monitored over three consecutive production cycles, were similar for EW and LW cows. Differences (P < 0.05) in body weight were observed between winter feeding treatments. SG cows had the lowest weight (605 kg) and backfat thickness (4.5 nun) at pre-breeding; AD cows were intermediate (623 kg and 5.1 mm); and TD cows were heaviest (639 kg) with the most backfat (6.4 mm). Calving interval, length of the calving span, calving pattern and cumulative open and cull rates were similar among the winter feeding strategies for cows monitored over three production cycles. Swath grazing required 38.4% less labour than'traditional feeding and 20.9% less labour than alternate day winter feeding. Total cash cost over the first 100 d of winter feeding for the SG winter feeding strategy was $70.00 cow(-1) less than TD (45.5%) and $56.70 cow(-1) less than AD (40.4%) winter feeding strategies. On average, 300 and 314 cow swath grazing d ha(-1) were required to cover the cost of feed in the TD and AD winter feeding strategies, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 522
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] INFLUENCE OF WINTER FEEDING ON MILK PRODUCTIONOF WET BEEF COWS
    ANTHONY, WB
    BROWN, VL
    HARRIS, RR
    STARLING, JG
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1961, 20 (02) : 399 - &
  • [32] Duration of calving stages in beef cows under different housing systems
    Ugnivenko, Anatolii
    Demchuk, Stepan
    Nosevych, Dmytro
    Bondarenko, Gennadii
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2020, 90 (11): : 1531 - 1534
  • [33] CONCENTRATE SUPPLEMENTATION FOR SPRING CALVING COWS
    GLEESON, PA
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 1981, 36 (02) : 138 - 140
  • [34] THE INFLUENCE OF BODY CONDITION SCORE ON WINTER WEIGHT AND CONDITION LOSSES BY SPRING CALVING COWS
    WAGNER, JJ
    LUSBY, KS
    RAKESTRAW, J
    OKLAHOMA AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION, 1985, (117): : 186 - 188
  • [35] Effects of Spring and Fall Stockpile Grazing Management System on Performance of Fall-Calving Beef Cows, pre-Weaning Calf Performance, and Forage Characteristics.
    Ewing, Kylie
    Neira, Lucas T.
    Steckler, Teresa
    Meteer, William T.
    Shike, Daniel W.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 100 : 318 - 318
  • [36] Effects of timing of weaning in a fall-calving system on performance of beef cows and their progeny.
    Hudson, M. D.
    Banta, J. P.
    Buchanan, D. S.
    Lalman, D. L.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 85 : 15 - 15
  • [37] A MARKOVIAN DECISION-MODEL FOR BEEF-CATTLE REPLACEMENT THAT CONSIDERS SPRING AND FALL CALVING
    AZZAM, SM
    AZZAM, AM
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1991, 69 (06) : 2329 - 2341
  • [38] Effects of grass pasture and concentrate-based feeding systems for spring-calving dairy cows in early spring on performance during lactation
    Kennedy, E
    O'Donovan, M
    Murphy, JP
    Delaby, L
    O'Mara, F
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2005, 60 (03) : 310 - 318
  • [39] An outbreak of congenital goiter and chondrodystrophy among calves born to spring-calving beef cows
    Homerosky, Elizabeth R.
    Johnsen, Megan
    Steinmann, Mei
    Matejka, Carling
    Jelinski, Michael J.
    CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 2019, 60 (09): : 981 - 984
  • [40] Zero, 1/4, and 1/2 Brahman cows in spring vs fall calving programs
    Buchanan, D.
    Frahm, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 : 26 - 26