Effect of intraoperative position in single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the L4/5 level on segmental and overall lumbar lordosis in patients with lumbar degenerative disease

被引:15
|
作者
Miyazaki, Masashi [1 ]
Ishihara, Toshinobu [1 ]
Abe, Tetsutaro [1 ]
Kanezaki, Shozo [1 ]
Notani, Naoki [1 ]
Kataoka, Masashi [2 ]
Tsumura, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Oita Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1-1 Idaigaoka,Hasama Machi, Yufu, Oita 8795593, Japan
[2] Oita Univ, Fac Welf & Hlth Sci, Phys Therapy Course Study, Oita, Japan
关键词
lumbar degenerative disease; lumbar lordosis; operative position; segmental lordosis; surgical table; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; SAGITTAL ALIGNMENT; OPERATIVE POSITION; RESTORATION; MAINTENANCE; HEIGHT;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000017316
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of intraoperative positions in single-level (L4-5) transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on segmental and overall lumbar lordosis (LL) in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. Thirty-eight consecutive patients who had undergone single-segment (L4-5) TLIF with 0 degrees polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage and pedicle screw fixation were evaluated. Twenty patients underwent surgery on the four-poster type frame with hip flexion at 30 degrees (Group I) and 18 patients were operated on a Jackson spinal table to adjust their hip flexion to 0 degrees (Group II). Preoperative standing, intraoperative prone, and postoperative standing lateral radiographs were obtained in each patient. The overall and segmental LL were analyzed according to the position in which the patients were placed for their operation and results compared between Groups I and II. Intraoperative intervertebral segmental LL at L4-5 and L5-S1 was increased in Group II than in Group I, whereas postoperative intervertebral segmental LL at L4-5 (fused level) was increased LL. In Group I intraoperative intervertebral segmental LL at L4-5 did not achieve sufficient lordosis, whereas postoperative intervertebral segmental LL at L3-4 was increased. The overall spinal alignment was unaffected by the decreased segmental LL in the fused level owing to the compensation of the upper adjacent segments. The more the hip was extended intraoperatively, the more the segmental lordosis increased in the lower lumbar spine. Thus, selecting the appropriate surgical table and hip position are very important. Underachievement of segmental lordosis leads to the acceleration of upper adjacent segment load.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Analysis of Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Wiltse Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approaches for Treating Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nurmukhametov, Renat
    Dosanov, Medet
    Medetbek, Abakirov
    Ramirez, Manuel De Jesus Encarnacion
    Chavda, Vishal
    Chmutin, Gennady
    Montemurro, Nicola
    SURGERIES, 2023, 4 (04): : 623 - 634
  • [32] Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis
    Li, Aimin
    Li, Xiang
    Zhong, Yang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [33] Lumbar alignment and patient-reported outcomes after single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with and without local coronal imbalance
    Pan, Wei
    Zhao, Jia-li
    Xu, Jin
    Zhang, Ming
    Fang, Tao
    Yan, Jing
    Wang, Xin-hong
    Zhou, Quan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2021, 34 (03) : 464 - 470
  • [34] Comparing Radiographic Parameters for Single-Level L5-S1 Interbody Fusion: Anterior Lumbar (ALIF) Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Edwards, Caleb S.
    Chan, Andrew Kai-Hong
    Chou, Dean
    Mummaneni, Praveen V.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 66 : 173 - 174
  • [35] Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 for an Obese Population
    Patel, Madhav Rajesh
    Jacob, Kevin Chacko
    Zamanian, Cameron
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael Clifford
    Vanjani, Nisheka Navin
    Singh, Kern
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 17 (02) : 293 - 303
  • [36] Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 157 : E111 - E122
  • [37] Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (21) : E1382 - E1390
  • [38] Single-level instrumented mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients
    Lee, Dong Yeob
    Jung, Tag-Geun
    Lee, Sang-Ho
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 9 (02) : 137 - 144
  • [39] Predictors of Postoperative Segmental and Overall Lumbar Lordosis in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Consecutive Case Series
    Zhang, Justin K.
    Greenberg, Jacob K.
    Javeed, Saad
    Benedict, Braeden
    Botterbush, Kathleen S.
    Dibble, Christopher F.
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Brehm, Samuel
    Jain, Deeptee
    Dorward, Ian
    Santiago, Paul
    Molina, Camilo
    Pennicooke, Brenton H.
    Ray, Wilson Z.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2025, 15 (02) : 425 - 437
  • [40] Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    Han, Xiao-guang
    Tang, Guo-qing
    Han, Xiao
    Xing, Yong-gang
    Zhang, Qi
    He, Da
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (07) : 2093 - 2101