Labor Induction With a Foley Balloon Inflated to 30 mL Compared With 60 mL A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:77
|
作者
Delaney, Shani
Shaffer, Brian L.
Cheng, Yvonne W.
Vargas, Juan
Sparks, Teresa N.
Paul, Kathleen
Caughey, Aaron B.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Clin & Policy Perinatal Res, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Boston, MA 02114 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2010年 / 115卷 / 06期
关键词
ORAL MISOPROSTOL; CATHETER; GEL; DINOPROSTONE; OXYTOCIN; 30-ML; RISK;
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181dec6d0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare 30-mL and 60-mL Foley balloon inflation for labor induction and the effect on length of labor and mode of delivery. METHODS: Women with term, vertex, singleton pregnancies (n = 192) and a Bishop score less than 5 were assigned randomly to receive a transcervical Foley balloon inflated to either 30 mL or 60 mL. Exclusion criteria were painful, regular contractions on admission, ruptured membranes, low-lying placenta, or prior hysterotomy. Randomization was stratified by parity, and health care providers were blinded to Foley balloon size. Primary outcome was delivery within 24 hours of Foley balloon placement. Secondary outcomes included delivery within 12 hours, time from Foley balloon placement to expulsion, cervical dilation after Foley balloon expulsion, maximum oxytocin dose, method of delivery, wchorioamnionitis, meconium, cervical laceration, abruption, 5-minute Apgar score, and umbilical cord gases. RESULTS: A higher proportion of women randomly assigned to the 60-mL Foley balloon achieved delivery within 12 hours of placement compared with the 30-mL Foley balloon group (26% compared with 14%, P=.04). This difference was more pronounced among nulliparous women. There was no difference in median time interval to delivery or proportion of women who achieved delivery within 24 hours. Median cervical dilation after Foley balloon expulsion was higher in the 60-mL Foley balloon group (4 cm compared with 3 cm, P<.01). There were no differences in the frequencies of cesarean delivery, maternal morbidity, or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Labor induction using Foley balloons inflated to 60 mL was more likely to achieve delivery within 12 hours compared with 30-mL inflation. There were no differences in delivery within 24 hours, cesarean delivery, labor complications, or neonatal outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1239 / 1245
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vaginal dinoprostone versus Foley catheter for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial
    Liu, Xiaohua
    Huang, Ding
    Liu, Yang
    Qu, Cuicui
    Mo, Huiqin
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Wentao
    Mol, Ben Willem W.
    Shen, Hong
    Cheng, Weiwei
    Ying, Hao
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S59 - S60
  • [22] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Vallikkannu, Narayanan
    Laboh, Naumi
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    Hong, Jesrine Gek Shan
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Lim, Boon Kiong
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2022, 306 (04) : 1027 - 1036
  • [23] Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial
    Narayanan Vallikkannu
    Naumi Laboh
    Peng Chiong Tan
    Jesrine Gek Shan Hong
    Mukhri Hamdan
    Boon Kiong Lim
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2022, 306 : 1027 - 1036
  • [24] Mechanical Labor Induction Using the Foley Catheter Balloon Compared With the Cook Cervical Balloon
    Fuks, Aleksandr M.
    Robinson, Jenelle Vonetta
    Rothschild, Tod Jay
    Akinnawonu, Kolawole Felix
    Salafia, Carolyn
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 : 37S - 37S
  • [25] Labor induction utilizing the Foley balloon: a randomized trial comparing delayed versus immediate removal
    Sharma, Kathryn
    Grubbs, Brendan
    Mullin, Patrick
    Opper, Neisha
    Lee, Richard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S326 - S326
  • [26] Six vs 12 hours of Foley catheter balloon placement in the labor induction of multiparas with unfavorable cervixes: a randomized controlled trial
    Kamarudzman, Nadiah
    Omar, Siti Zawiah
    Gan, Farah
    Hong, Jesrine
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2023, 5 (11)
  • [27] Tugging the Foley catheter balloon every three hours in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
    Yunesh, Krishnan
    Adlan, Aizura Syafinaz Ahmad
    Wong, Thai Ying
    Gan, Farah
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2025, 7 (02)
  • [28] Patient Pain and Satisfaction With 10, 30, and 70 mL Transcervical Foley Balloons for Cervical Ripening During Induction of Labor
    Dombrovsky, Inessa
    Roloff, Kristina
    Okekpe, C. Camille
    Stowe, Robert
    Valenzuela, Guillermo J.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [29] Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor at Term: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial
    Gu, Ning
    Ru, Tong
    Wang, Zhiqun
    Dai, Yimin
    Zheng, Mingming
    Xu, Biyun
    Hu, Yali
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [30] Outpatient Foley catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a randomized-controlled trial
    Ausbeck, Elizabeth B.
    Jauk, Victoria C.
    Xue, Yumo
    Files, Pamela
    Kuper, Spencer
    Subramaniam, Akila
    Casey, Brian M.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Harper, Lorie M.
    Tita, Alan T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S759 - S759