Performance Evaluation of CoAP and MQTT_SN Protocols

被引:1
|
作者
Al-Qassab, Rahaf A. [1 ]
Aal-Nouman, Mohammed, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Nahrain Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Dept Informat & Commun Engn, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
IoT; CoAP; MQTT_SN; Protocols; Contiki-OS; Cooja; Powertrace;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-97255-4_17
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Internet of Things (IoT) protocols are a set of rules or standards that are used to facilitate communication between connected devices over a wireless network. One of the most important requirements of a wireless sensor networks (WSN) is power efficiency because it depends on the life span of the batteries of sensor nodes. This paper resolves to evaluate the performance of application-layer IoT protocols such as CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) and MQTT_SN (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport for Sensor Networks) in terms of power efficiency. Contiki-OS and Cooja Simulator were utilized to conduct the simulation of the protocols and to collect the data of the nodes which was used to calculate the power consumption. Simulation Results show that CoAP is relatively more power efficient than MQTT_SN. It was also evaluated that the highest power consumption is happening at different power states for each protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 236
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Network Performance Analysis of MQTT Security Protocols with Constrained Hardware in the Dark Net for DMS
    Gentile, Antonio Francesco
    Macri, Davide
    Carni, Domenico Luca
    Greco, Emilio
    Lamonaca, Francesco
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (18):
  • [42] Performance Evaluation of Video Streaming Application Over CoAP in IoT
    Rahman, Waqas Ur
    Choi, Young-Seok
    Chung, Kwangsue
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2019, 7 : 39852 - 39861
  • [43] CoAP Over SMS: Performance Evaluation for Machine to Machine Communication
    Gligoric, Nenad
    Dimcic, Tomislav
    Drajic, Dejan
    Krco, Srdjan
    Dejanovic, Igor
    Chu, Nhon
    Obradovic, Aleksandar
    [J]. 2012 20TH TELECOMMUNICATIONS FORUM (TELFOR), 2012, : 1 - 4
  • [44] A comparison of AMQP and MQTT protocols for Internet of Things
    Nguyen Quoc Uy
    Vu Hoai Nam
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2019 6TH NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT (NAFOSTED) CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCE (NICS), 2019, : 292 - 297
  • [45] Analysis of MQTT-SN and LWM2M communication protocols for precision agriculture IoT devices
    dos Santos, Rogerio Pereira
    Leithardt, Valderi R. Q.
    Beko, Marko
    [J]. 2022 17TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2022,
  • [46] Performance Evaluation of AMQP and CoAP for Low-Cost Automation
    Caiza, Gustavo
    Leon, Carlos S.
    Campana, Luis A.
    Garcia, Carlos A.
    Garcia, Marcelo, V
    [J]. APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES (ICAT 2019), PT I, 2020, 1193 : 340 - 353
  • [47] PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MQTT-BASED INTERNET OF THINGS SYSTEMS
    Handosa, Mohamed
    Gracanin, Denis
    Elmongui, Hicham
    [J]. 2017 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2017, : 4544 - 4545
  • [48] Performance Evaluation of MQTT Brokers in the Internet of Things for Smart Cities
    de Oliveira, Davi L.
    Veloso, Artur F. da S.
    Sobral, Jose V. V.
    Rabelo, Ricardo A. L.
    Rodrigues, Joel J. P. C.
    Solic, Petar
    [J]. 2019 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES (SPLITECH), 2019, : 247 - 252
  • [49] Performance of the XMPP and the MQTT Protocols on IEC 61850-Based Micro Grid Communication Architecture
    Jun, Hyun-Ji
    Yang, Hyo-Sik
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [50] Performance Evaluation of a Smart CoAP Gateway for Remote Home Safety Services
    Kim, Hyun-Sik
    Seo, Jong-Su
    Seo, Jeongwook
    [J]. KSII TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 9 (08): : 3079 - 3089