Performance Evaluation of CoAP and MQTT_SN Protocols

被引:1
|
作者
Al-Qassab, Rahaf A. [1 ]
Aal-Nouman, Mohammed, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Al Nahrain Univ, Coll Informat Engn, Dept Informat & Commun Engn, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
IoT; CoAP; MQTT_SN; Protocols; Contiki-OS; Cooja; Powertrace;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-97255-4_17
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Internet of Things (IoT) protocols are a set of rules or standards that are used to facilitate communication between connected devices over a wireless network. One of the most important requirements of a wireless sensor networks (WSN) is power efficiency because it depends on the life span of the batteries of sensor nodes. This paper resolves to evaluate the performance of application-layer IoT protocols such as CoAP (Constrained Application Protocol) and MQTT_SN (Message Queuing Telemetry Transport for Sensor Networks) in terms of power efficiency. Contiki-OS and Cooja Simulator were utilized to conduct the simulation of the protocols and to collect the data of the nodes which was used to calculate the power consumption. Simulation Results show that CoAP is relatively more power efficient than MQTT_SN. It was also evaluated that the highest power consumption is happening at different power states for each protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 236
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Distributed UCON in CoAP and MQTT Protocols
    Rizos, Athanasios
    Bastos, Daniel
    Saracino, Andrea
    Martinelli, Fabio
    [J]. COMPUTER SECURITY, ESORICS 2019, 2020, 11980 : 35 - 52
  • [2] A Comparative study of COAP and MQTT communication protocols
    Hamdani, Samer
    Sbeyti, Hassan
    [J]. 2019 7TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DIGITAL FORENSICS AND SECURITY (ISDFS), 2019,
  • [3] Performance Evaluation of MQTT and CoAP via a Common Middleware
    Thangavel, Dinesh
    Ma, Xiaoping
    Valera, Alvin
    Tan, Hwee-Xian
    Tan, Colin Keng-Yan
    [J]. 2014 IEEE NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SENSORS, SENSOR NETWORKS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING (IEEE ISSNIP 2014), 2014,
  • [4] Performance evaluation of CoAP and MQTT with security support for IoT environments
    Seoane, Victor
    Garcia-Rubio, Carlos
    Almenares, Florina
    Campo, Celeste
    [J]. COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2021, 197
  • [5] A Performance Analysis of Internet of Things Networking Protocols: Evaluating MQTT, CoAP, OPC UA
    Silva, Daniel
    Carvalho, Liliana I.
    Soares, Jose
    Sofia, Rute C.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [6] Experimental analysis of the MQTT and MQTT-SN protocols
    Spohn, Marco Aurelio
    Genero, Willian Bordignon
    [J]. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE COMPUTACAO APLICADA, 2023, 15 (01): : 22 - 33
  • [7] A Performance Analysis of the Security Communication in CoAP and MQTT
    Laaroussi, Zakaria
    Novo, Oscar
    [J]. 2021 IEEE 18TH ANNUAL CONSUMER COMMUNICATIONS & NETWORKING CONFERENCE (CCNC), 2021,
  • [8] Comparison of CoAP and MQTT Performance Over Capillary Radios
    Larmo, Anna
    Del Carpio, Felipe
    Arvidson, Pontus
    Chirikov, Roman
    [J]. 2018 GLOBAL INTERNET OF THINGS SUMMIT (GIOTS), 2018, : 127 - 132
  • [9] Choice of Effective Messaging Protocols for IoT Systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP
    Naik, Nitin
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ISSE 2017), 2017, : 12 - 18
  • [10] Comparative Performance Analysis between MQTT and CoAP Protocols for IoT with Raspberry PI 3 in IEEE 802.11 Environments
    Guaman, Yesenia
    Ninahualpa, Geovanni
    Salazar, Gustavo
    Guarda, Teresa
    [J]. 2020 15TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI'2020), 2020,