Characterization of particle-interactions by atomic force microscopy: Effect of contact area

被引:49
|
作者
Hooton, JC
German, CS
Allen, S
Davies, MC
Roberts, CJ [1 ]
Tendler, SJB
Williams, PM
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Lab Biophys & Surface Anal, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Bradford Particle Design Ltd, Bradford BD7 1HR, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
SEDS; micronized; AFM; contact area; work of adhesion;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022684911383
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Purpose. The purpose of this work was to compare adhesion forces, contact area, and work of adhesion of salbutamol sulphate particles produced using micronization and a supercritical fluid technique (solution-enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids - SEDS(TM)) using atomic force microscopy (AFM). Methods. Adhesion forces of individual particles of micronized and SEDS(TM) salbutamol against a highly orientated pyrolytic graphite surface were acquired in a liquid environment consistent with that of a pressurized metered dose inhaler. The forces were then related to contact area and work of adhesion. Results. The raw adhesion force data for the micronized and SEDS(TM) material were 14.1 nN (SD 2.5 nN) and 4.2 nN (SD 0.8 nN), respectively. After correction for contact area, the forces per unit area were 13 mN/mum(2) (SD 2.3 mN/mum(2)) and 3 mN/mum(2) (SD 0.6 mN/mum(2)). The average work of adhesion was calculated using the Johnson-Kendall-Roberts theory and was found to be 19 mJm(-2) (SD 3.4 mJm(-2)) for the micronized particle and 4 mJm(-2) (SD 0.8 mJm(-2)) for the SEDS(TM) particle. Conclusions. It is possible to produce a three-dimensional representation of the contact area involved in the interaction and make quantitative comparisons between different particles. There was a lower force per unit area and work of adhesion observed for the SEDS(TM) material, possibly because of its lower surface free energy.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 514
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protein interactions visualized by atomic force microscopy
    Borman, S
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2000, 78 (33) : 40 - 40
  • [32] Probing Aggrecan Interactions by Atomic Force Microscopy
    Chandran, Preethi L.
    Dimitriadis, Emilios K.
    Basser, Peter J.
    Horkay, Ferenc
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 100 (03) : 542 - 542
  • [33] THE EFFECT OF PROCAINE ON LIPID DOMAINS INVESTIGATED BY CONTACT MODE ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY
    Frangopol, Petre T.
    Cadenhead, David Allan
    Tomoaia, Gheorghe
    Mocanu, Aurora
    Tomoaia-Cotisel, Maria
    REVUE ROUMAINE DE CHIMIE, 2015, 60 (2-3) : 265 - 273
  • [34] Topographic characterization of unworn contact lenses assessed by atomic force microscopy and wavelet transform
    Talu, Stefan
    Stepien, Krzysztof
    Caglayan, Mustafa Oguzhan
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2015, 78 (11) : 1026 - 1031
  • [35] Atomic Force Microscopy as a Characterization Tool for Contact Lenses: Indentation Tests and Grain Analysis
    Caglayan, Mustafa Oguzhan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLYMERIC MATERIALS AND POLYMERIC BIOMATERIALS, 2014, 63 (13) : 680 - 684
  • [36] Comment on "Surface characterization of hydrosilylated polypropylene: Contact angle measurement and atomic force microscopy"
    Zhang, JF
    Grundke, K
    Kwok, DY
    LANGMUIR, 2003, 19 (24) : 10457 - 10458
  • [37] Contact-resonance atomic force microscopy for viscoelasticity
    Yuya, P. A.
    Hurley, D. C.
    Turner, J. A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2008, 104 (07)
  • [38] Enhanced performance in contact mode atomic force microscopy
    Li, Zhichong
    Lee, Edward
    Ben Amara, Foued
    2006 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2006, 1-12 : 526 - +
  • [39] Nonlinear contact resonance spectroscopy in atomic force microscopy
    Rupp, Daniel
    Rabe, Ute
    Hirsekorn, Sigrun
    Arnold, Walter
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2007, 40 (22) : 7136 - 7145
  • [40] CONTACT ANGLE MEASUREMENT THROUGH ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY
    Yu, Jiapeng
    Wang, Hao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2011, VOL 10, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 613 - 617